This study examined Persian intermediate and advanced EFL learners’ perceptions regarding (a) their own and their teachers’ responsibility in learning language autonomously; (b) their decision making ability in learning language autonomously; and (c) their autonomous learning activities inside and outside the classroom. To this end, a questionnaire designed by Chan, Spratt, and Humphrey (2002) was distributed among 67 intermediate and 65 advanced EFL learners. Statistical analysis of students’ answers showed that overall, advanced learners tended to assume more responsibility for their own learning, to perceive themselves to be highly capable of autonomous learning, and to practice more autonomous learning activities compared to the intermediate learners. In addition, data collected through the interviews with some of the participants suggested that learners’ perceptions were greatly affected by their previous educational experiences. Since intermediate learners were not largely engaged in making decisions related to educational materials and activities used in their classrooms, they considered themselves as less responsible for and consequently less capable of choosing learning materials and activities. The findings of the study, along with the pedagogical implications, are discussed.
(1998) Ten commandments for motivating language learners: results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2(3), 203–229.
(2008) The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2013) Teaching for learner autonomy: the teacher’s role and sociocultural theory. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 7(3), 213–225.
Hsieh, P., & Kang, H.
(2010) Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606–627.
Humphreys, G., & Wyatt, M.
(2014) Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal, 68(1), 52–61.
Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F.
(Eds.) (2003) Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
(2001) Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2007) Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.
(1999) Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94.
Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., Schoot, R., Wagner, P., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C.
(2012) Lifelong learning as a goal: Do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils?Learning and Instruction, 221, 27–36.
(2012) Narrative frames and needs analysis. System. 401, 120–128.
(2010) East Asian EFL learners’ autonomous learning, learner perception on autonomy and portfolio development: in the case of educational contexts in Japan. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(17): 234–41.
(2008) Supporting learner autonomy: Developing practice through the production of courses for distance learners of French, German and Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 83–102.
Nasri, N., Vahid Dastjerdy, H., Eslami Rasekh, A., & Amirian, Z.
(2015) Iranian EFL teachers’ practices and learner autonomy: Do gender, educational degree, and experience matter?Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1–13.
(2013) Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30.
Oxford, R. L.
(1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L.
(2001) Language learning strategies. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to speakers of other languages (pp. 166–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L.
(2015) Expanded perspectives on autonomous learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 58–71.
(2003) The representation of learner autonomy in organizational culture. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 240–253). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Railton, D., & Watson, P.
(2005) Teaching autonomy: ‘Reading groups’ and the development of autonomous learning practices. Active Learning in Higher Education, 61, 182–193.
Riazi, A., & N. Mosalanejad
(2010) Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian high school and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4), 1–16.
Richards, J. C.
(2015) The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22.
(1996) ‘The blind man and the bubble’: researching self-access. In R. Pemberton, et al. (Eds.) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 251–64). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
(1975) What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51.
Saslow, J. & Ascher, A.
(2012) Top notch series. Longman: Pearson Education.
(2006) CALL, self-access and learner autonomy: A linear process from heteronomy to autonomy? In A. W. T. Harden (Ed.), The concept of progression in the teaching and learning of foreign languages (pp. 75–85). Bern: Peter Lang.
(1984) Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 191, 48–58.
Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V.
(2002) Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first?Language Teaching Research, 6 (3), 245–266.
(1996) Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
(2003) Motivation as a socially mediated process. In D. Little, J. Ridley, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment (pp. 90–102). Dublin: Authentik.
Victori, M., & Lockhart, W.
(1995) Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 231, 223–234.
(2008) Beliefs and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.). Lessons from good language learners (pp. 19–34). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L.
(1999) Student’s developing conceptions of themselves as language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 831, 193–201.
Williams, M., Burden, R., Poulet, G., & Maun, I.
(2004) Learners’ perceptions of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 301, 19–29.
Cited by 5 other publications
Alizadeh, Iman & Farideh Ebrahimi
2019. Investigating medical students’ readiness for technology-mediated autonomous learning situations in ESP programs. Education and Information Technologies 24:6 ► pp. 3289 ff.
Fauzi, C., B. Basikin, Sh. Duisenbayeva & G. Kassymova
2020. EXPLORING EFL STUDENT TEACHERS READINESS AND GENDER DIFFERENCES OF LEARNER AUTONOMY. THE BULLETIN 1:383 ► pp. 288 ff.
2021. Student’s strategies in online autonomous English language learning. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society) 6:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Tai, Hung-Cheng, Chun-Ming Chen, Yuan-Hsiung Tsai & Hsiu-Ling Chen
2020. 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), ► pp. 164 ff.
Xu, Shuyan, Xiang Li & Xianhua Yang
2021. Multilateral interactive teaching model for improving foreign language learners’ autonomous learning ability by using multimedia network technology. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education► pp. 002072092098607 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.