Research on collaborative work has explored the benefits of task repetition (TR) for L2 development. TR has been claimed to improve L2 complexity, accuracy and fluency, provide opportunities for feedback, and increase learners’ engagement in their L2, as reported in studies that have explored patterns of interaction. Research on this topic, particularly that undertaken with EFL children as participants, has gained attention in recent years. However, there is a dearth of literature regarding the impact of TR on the patterns of interaction and on the opportunities to receive feedback for child ESL learners. The aim of the present study is to address this gap examining the interactions of 28 young ESL learners who completed the same spot-the-difference task twice within a 3-month time frame. The findings showed that the majority of pairs represented patterns of interaction with low levels of mutuality (i.e. engagement) and upon TR these patterns barely varied. However, regardless of learners’ patterns of interaction, these ESL learners provided feedback and negotiated during task-based interaction, especially the collaborative pairs.
2011The Effect of ‘Massed’ Task Repetitions on Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Does it Transfer to a New Task?The Language Learning Journal 39 (3): 269–280.
Ahmadian, M. J.
2012Task Repetition in ELT. ELT Journal 66 (3): 380–382.
Ahmadian, M. J., and M. Tavakoli
2011The Effects of Simultaneous Use of Careful Online Planning and Task Repetition on Accuracy, Complexity, and Fluency in EFL Learners’ Oral Production. Language Teaching Research 151: 35–59.
Azkarai, A., and M. P. García Mayo
2017Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research 21 (4): 480–495.
Azkarai, A., and R. Oliver
2019Negative feedback on task repetition: ESL vs. EFL child settings. The Language Learning Journal 47 (3): 269–280.
Bret Blasco, A.
2014L2 English young learners’ oral production skills in CLIL and EFL settings: A longitudinal study. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
Brooks, L., and R. Donato
2009Languaging in Collaborative Writing: Creation of and Response to Expertise. In Multiple Perspectives on Interaction. Second Language Research in honor of Susan M. Gass, edited by Mackey, A., and C. Polio, 58–89. London: Routledge.
Butler, Y. G., and W. Zeng
2015Young Foreign Language Learners’ Interactional Development in Task-based Paired Assessment in their First and Foreign Languages: A Case of English Learners in China. Education 3–13 431: 292–321.
1996Effects of Task Repetition: Appraising the Developing Language of Learners. In Challenge and Change in Language Teaching, edited by Willis, J. and D. Willis (136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.
2001Effects of Task Repetition on the Structure and Control of Oral Language. In Task-based Learning: Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, edited by Bygate, M., Skehan, P., and M. Swain (23–48). London: Longman.
2016Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal 441, 451–466.
García Mayo, M. P., A. Imaz Agirre and A. Azkarai
2017Task repetition effects on CAF in EFL child task-based oral interaction. In Recent Perspectives on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching, edited by M. Ahmadian, and M. P. García Mayo (11–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
García Mayo, M. P. and M. L. García Lecumberri
2003Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jarred, A., and N. Roelofs
2003Developing Oral Language with Barrier Games. Bentley, WA: Hands on Concepts.
Kim, Y., and N. Tracy-Ventura
2013The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System 411: 829–840.
Lantolf, J. P.
2000Second Language Learning as a Mediated Process. Language Teaching 331, 79–96.
Lázaro Ibarrola, A., and R. Azpilicueta Martínez
2015Investigating Negotiation of Meaning in EFL Children with Very Low Levels of Proficiency. International Journal of English Studies 15 (1): 1–21.
1996The Role of Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition, edited by Ritchie, W. C., and T. Bhatia (413–468). New York: Academic Press.
Lyster, R., and L. Ranta
1997Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1), 37–66.
Mackey, A., A. P. Kanganas and R. Oliver
2007Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 41 (2), 285–312.
1995Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 171, 459–481.
1998Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal 82 (3), 372–386.
2002The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal 86 (1), 97–111.
2014An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal 311: 23–46.
2012Repeating Input-based Tasks with Young Beginner Learners. RELC Journal 43 (1): 39–51.
2014Using Tasks with Young Beginner Learners: The Role of the Teacher. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 8 (3): 279–294.
2002Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work. Language Learning 51: 119–158.
2009The Nature of Pair Interaction: Learners’ Interaction in an ESL Class: Its Nature and Impact on Grammatical Development. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
2000The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition Through Collaborative Dialogue. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, edited by Lantolf, J. (97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2006Languaging, Agency and Collaboration in Advanced Second Language Learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky, edited by Byrnes, H. (95–108). London: Continuum.
Tan, L., G. Wigglesworth and N. Storch
2010Pair Interaction and Mode of Communication: Comparing Face-to-Face and Computer Mediated Communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 331: 1–27.
Vygotsky, L. S.
1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watanabe, Y., and M. Swain
2007Effects of Proficiency Differences and Patterns of Pair Interaction on Second Language Learning: Collaborative Dialogue Between Adult ESL Learners. Language Teaching Research 11 (2): 121–142.
Cited by 5 other publications
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Marta Kopinska
2020. Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System 94 ► pp. 102338 ff.
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Sujeong Choi
2022. Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research 26:6 ► pp. 1106 ff.
Lin, Po-Hung, Hung-Jen Chen & Zhi-Qian Wang
2021. Visual Performance Assessment of Videos—A Case Study of the Game “Spot the Difference”. Applied Sciences 11:16 ► pp. 7628 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.