Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 25/26 (1974) ► pp.161187
References
AUSUBEL, D.P.
, The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York/London1963.Google Scholar
BOL, E. & CARPAY, J.A.M.
, Der Semantisierungsprozeß im Fremdsprachenunterricht. In : Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 191 (1972), pp. 119-133.Google Scholar
, Diagnostik von «schwierigen» grammatischen Strukturen. In : Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 211 (1974), pp. 145-158.Google Scholar
BRAGINA, T. B.
, Nekotoryje psichologiceskije uslovija formirovanija reci na inostrannom jazyke. Avtoreferat. Moskva 1972.Google Scholar
BUTZKAMM, W.
, Aufgeklärte Einsprachigkeit. Heidelberg 1973.Google Scholar
CARROLL, J. B.
, The Contribution of Psychological Theory and Educational Research to the Teaching of Foreign Languages. In: Modern Language Journal 51 (1965), pp. 273-281.Google Scholar
DODSON, C. J.
, Language Teaching and The Bilingual Method. London 1967.Google Scholar
ENGELS, L. K.
, The Function of Grammar in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language. In: I.T.L. 101 (1970), pp. 11-24.Google Scholar
GAL'PERIN, P. J.
, Stages in the development of mental acts. In : Colen, M. & Maltzman, I. (eds.) A Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology. New York/London 1969.Google Scholar
, Novije vozmožnosti obucenija, v castnosti, inostrannym jazykam. In: Voprosy metodiki prepodavanija inostrannych jazykov na nejazykovych fakul'tetach universitetov. Izd. moskovskogo universiteta 1971, pp. 69-82.Google Scholar
, K psichologii formirovanija reci na inostrannom jazyke. In : Psicholingvistika i obucenije inostrancev russkomu jazyku. Izd. moskovskogo universiteta 1972, pp. 60-71.Google Scholar
GOL'DIN, Z. D.
, Metodika obucenija inostrancev russkomu skloneniju. Avtoreferat Moskva 1960.Google Scholar
ISACENKO, A. V.
, Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, Teil I Formenlehre. Halle 1962.Google Scholar
KABANOVA, O.J.
, Formironvanije grammaticeskoj struktury vyskazyvanija. Avtoreferat Moskva 1971.Google Scholar
KEULEERS, A.
, Insight, Automatization and Creativity in Foreign-Language learning. Doct. Diss. Catholic University of Leuven 1974.Google Scholar
KULJUTKIN, Ju.N. & SUCHOBSKAJA, G. S.
, Ob izpol'zovanii schematiceskoj nagladnosti pri formirovanii grammaticeskich umenij. In : Voprosy Psichologii 1967 no. 11.Google Scholar
KULJUTKIN, Ju.N.
, Everisticeskije metody v strukture rešenij. Moskva 1970.Google Scholar
LANDA, L. N.
, Algorithmierung im Unterricht. Berlin (DDR) 1969 (Russ. orig. 1966).Google Scholar
LANDA, L.N.
(ed.) Voprosy algoritmizacii i programmirovanija obucenija. Vyp. 21. Moskva 1972.Google Scholar
LOMPSCHER, J.
, Geistige Erziehung als Forderung unserer Zeit. München/Basel 1968.Google Scholar
MACHT, K.
, Zur Didaktik und Methodik des Present Continous und des Simple Present. In : Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 201 (1973), pp. 368-377.Google Scholar
PARREREN, C.F. VAN
, Psychologie van het leren I. 4th revised ed. Arnhem 1969 (in German:) Lernprozeß und Lernerfolg. Braunschweig 1966.Google Scholar
, «Reine» Lernpsychologie und Fremdsprachen-Lernpsychologie. In : R. Freudenstein (ed.) Focus '80 Berlin/London 1972.Google Scholar
PARREREN, C.F. VAN & CARPAY, J.A.M.
, Sovjetpsychologen aan het woord. Groningen 1972.Google Scholar
PARREREN, C.F. VAN
, Grammatical Knowledge and Grammatical Skill. In: A.J. van Essen & J. P. Menting (eds.) The Context of Foreign Language Learning. Assen (The Netherlands): van Gorcum & Comp. B.V. 1975.Google Scholar
PIEPHO, H.E.
, Didaktische Modelle und Artikulationsphasen des Unterrichts. In: H. Osieka (ed.) Probleme, Prioritäten, Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main 1972, pp. 93-105.Google Scholar
SALISTRA, I.D.
, Methodik des neusprachlichen Unterrichts. Berlin (DDR) 1962 (transl. from Russian).Google Scholar
SCERBA, L. V.
, Prepodavanije inostrannych jazykov v sredney škole. Obšcije voprosy metodiki. Moskva/Leningrad 1947.Google Scholar
ŽDAN, A. N. & GOCHLERNER, M. M.
, Psichologiceskije mechanizmy usvojenija grammatiki rodnogo i inostrannogo jazykov. Moskva 1972.Google Scholar
VJATUTNEV, M.
(ed.) Russkij Jazyk 2. Audio-vizual'nyj kurs dlja zarubeznych škol. Moskva 1972.Google Scholar
ZIMMERMAN, G.
, Integrierungsphase and Transfer im neusprachlichen Unterricht. In : Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 161 (1969), pp. 245-260.Google Scholar
ZIMMERMANN, G.
, «Grammatische Bewußtmachung» im Fremdsprachenunterricht? In: Zielsprache English O (1971), pp. 13-17.Google Scholar
ZIMMERMAN, G.
, Lehrerbegleitheft bei Passport to English, Junior Course. German Edition. Wiesbaden : Verlag Hueber-Didier 1971.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Arievitch, Igor M. & Jacques P. P. Haenen
2005. Connecting Sociocultural Theory and Educational Practice: Galperin's Approach. Educational Psychologist 40:3  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Loretta & Richard Donato
2021. Interacting with SCOBAs in a Genre-based Approach to Italian as a FL. Language and Sociocultural Theory 7:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Haenen, Jacques
2001. Outlining the teaching–learning process: Piotr Gal'perin's contribution. Learning and Instruction 11:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Lantolf, James P.
2012. Praxis and Second Language Acquisition. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Ohta, Amy Snyder
2016. Sociocultural Theory and Second/Foreign Language Education. In Second and Foreign Language Education,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ohta, Amy Snyder
2017. Sociocultural Theory and Second/Foreign Language Education. In Second and Foreign Language Education,  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Sasao, Yosuke & Stuart Webb
2018. The guessing from context test. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Sasao, Yosuke & Stuart Webb
2020. The guessing from context test. In Approaches to Learning, Testing and Researching L2 Vocabulary [Benjamins Current Topics, 109],  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.