Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 29 (1975) ► pp. 5361
References

References

Aguas
1970 : E.F. Aguas, English Composition Errors of Tatalog Speakers and Implications for Analytical Theory. Unpublished Ph.d. Diss., Univ. of California, Los Angeles 1970.Google Scholar
Arabski
1968 : J. Arabski, Linguistic Analysis of English Composition Errors Made by Polish Students. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 1, n° 1-2 1968, pp. 71-89.Google Scholar
Buteau
1970 : M. Buteau, Students' Errors and the Learning of French as a Second Language. IRAL VIII 1970, pp. 133-145.Google Scholar
Castelo
1962 : L.M. Castelo, Structural Differences between English and Tatalog Verbs : A study Designed to Improve the Teaching of English to Advanced Filipino Students. Unpublished Doctoral Diss., Columbia Univ 1962.Google Scholar
Chaplen
1973 : E.F. Chaplen, Extract from : An Appraisal of the Syndicate's Written Examination in English as a Foreign Language together with some Suggested Modifications. Internal Paper, Univ. of Cambridge, Local Examinations Syndicated 1973.Google Scholar
Chau
1972 : T.T. Chau, The Concept of Difficulty in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Ph.d. Thesis, Univ. of Toronto 1972.Google Scholar
Colorado Project, The
1963, Hunn, B.E.; Silvers, S.L.; Ribbens, D.D.; Nebel, D.A.; Speer, R.W. Unpublished- Diss., Colorado State College 1963.Google Scholar
Corder
1973 : S.P. Corder, Introducing Applied Linguistics. Bucks : Hazell, WatsonViney Ltd (Penguin Education) 1973.Google Scholar
da Rocha
1973 : F.J. da Rocha, Error Analysis : A Working Bibliography with Special Emphasis on English. Cahiers de Linguistique, vol. II, n° 1-2 1973-1974, pp. 87-97.Google Scholar
Dulay
1972 : H.C. Dulay, Goofing : An Indicator of Children's Second Language Learning Strategies. Language Learning, vol. 22, n° 2 1972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duskova
1969 : L. Duskova, On Sources of Error in Foreign Language Teaching. IRAL VII 1969, pp. 11-6.Google Scholar
George
1972 : H.U. George, Common Errors in Language Learning. Rowley, Mass : Newbury House 1972.Google Scholar
Halliday
1964 : M.A.K. Halliday and A. Mcintosh, The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London : Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd 1964.Google Scholar
Jackson
1972 : K. Jackson, The Verification and Comparison of Contrastive Analysis. The PCCLLU Papers, vol. 3, n° 4 1971, pp. 201-210.Google Scholar
Nickel
1971 : G. Nickel, Variables in a Hierarchy of Difficulty. The PCCLLU Papers, vol. 3, n° 4 1971, pp. 185-194.Google Scholar
Politzer
1973 : R.L. Politzer and A.G. Ramirez, An Error Analysis of the Spoken English of Mexican-American Pupils in a Bilingual School and a Monolingual School. Language Learning, vol. 23, n° 1 1973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards
1971 : J. Richards, Error Analysis and Second Language Strategies. Language Sciences, n° 17 1971, pp. 12-22.Google Scholar
Routhledge
1972 : J.L. Routhledge, An Analysis of the Errors in the Written English of Advanced Portuguese Learners. Unpublished Diss., Univ. of Lancaster 1972.Google Scholar
Ruiz
1963 : M.B. Ruiz, Weighting and Sequencing English Tense-Aspect Modifications for Hiligaynon Speakers. Unpublished Doctoral Diss., Univ. of California, Los Angeles 1963.Google Scholar
Stormzand
1924 : M.J. Stormzand and M.U. O'Shea, How Much English Grammar? Baltimore : Warwick and York Inc 1924.Google Scholar
Strevens
1969 : Two Ways of Looking at Error Analysis. Washington, D.C. : ERIC Document Reproduction Service 1969.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Péry-Woodley, Marie-Paule
1991. Writing in L1 and L2: analysing and evaluating learners' texts. Language Teaching 24:2  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.