Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 3 (1969) ► pp. 2638
References

References

ANDERSON, J.
(1968a) Ergative and Nominative in English, Journal of Linguistics 4; pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
(1968b) On the Status of « Lexical Formatives », Foundations of Language IV; pp. 308–318.Google Scholar
BACH, E.
(1967) Have and he in English syntax, Language 43; pp. 462–485.Google Scholar
BAILLE, A.
(1968) Les systèmes logiques et les modèles sêmantiques des langues naturelles, T.A. Informations, 1; pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
BAILLE, A.; ROUAULT, J.
(1967) Un essai de formalisation de sémantique des langues naturelles. T.A. Informations, 1; pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
BAR-HILLEL, Y.
(1967) Dictionaries and Meaning Rules, Foundations of Language III; pp. 409–414.Google Scholar
BENVENISTE, E.
(1950) La phrase nominale, BSL XLVI (1950); now in: Problèmes de linguistique générale 1966; pp. 151–167.Google Scholar
BIERWISCH, M.
(1967) Some Semantic Universals of German Adjectives, Foundations of Language III; pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
BULL, W.E.
(1960) Time, Tense, and the Verb. Berkeley.Google Scholar
CHAFE, W.E.
(1967) review of: KATZ 1966; IJAL 33; pp. 248–254.Google Scholar
(1968) Idiomacity as an Anomaly in the Chomskyan Paradigm. Foundations of Language IV; pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
CHOMSKY, N.
(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
DE GEEST, W. P. F.
(1967) De huidige stand van de transformationeel-generatieve beschrijving van het Nederlands. Linguistiek (Limburgse Akademische Biblioteek) No. 1; pp. 37–81.Google Scholar
EBELING, C.L.
(1962) A Semantic Analysis of the Dutch Tenses, Lingua 11, pp. 86–99, now in « Taalkunde in artikelen » ed. J. Hoogteijling, Groningen 1968, pp. 298–311.Google Scholar
FILLMORE, C. J.
(1968) Lexical Entries for Verbs, Foundations of Language, IV, pp. 373–393.Google Scholar
FISCHINGER, M.
(1966) Zur Systematisierung von Bedeutungseinheiten, Zeits. Phon. Sprachw. und Kommunikationsforschung, 19; pp. 553–559.Google Scholar
HARTUNG, W.
(1966) Die zusammengesetzten Sätze des Deutschen; Studia Grammatica IV (2. Aufl.), Berlin.Google Scholar
HEGER, K.
(1963) Die Bezeichnung temporal-deiktischer Begriffskategorien im französischen und spanischen Konjugationssystem, Tübingen (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 104).Google Scholar
KALUZA, H.
(1968) Aspect in English and Polish, English Teaching Forum VI, 6; pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
KATZ, J.J.
(1966) The Philosophy of Language. New York & London.Google Scholar
(1967) Recent Issues in Semantic Theory, Foundations of Language III; pp. 124–194.Google Scholar
KATZ, J.J.; POSTAL, P.M.
(1964) An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
KRIZKOVA, H.
(1967) Adverbialni determinace s vyznamem casovym a pricinnym (Le complément circonstantiel du temps et de la cause), Slavia 36; pp. 507–531.Google Scholar
KIPARSKY, P.
(1968) Tense and Mood in Indo-European Syntax, Foundations of Language IV, pp. 30–57.Google Scholar
ORESNIK, J.
(1968) On N. Chomsky’s strict sub categorization of verbs, Linguistica VIII/1 (Ljubliana); pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
RUWET, N.
(1967) Introduction à la grammaire générative. Paris.Google Scholar
SCHEURWEGHS, G.
(1966) Present-day English Syntax. (3-d impd.) London.Google Scholar
SCHOGT, H. G.
(1965) « Temps et verbe » de Gustave Guillaume trente-cinq ans après sa parution. La linguistique 1; pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
SKALMOWSKI, W.
(1968) The « ergative construction » in Pashto, Folia Orientalia IX (Krakow); pp. 99–129.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, C. J.
1968Aspects of the Chinese Verb, Linguistica 38; pp. 70–76.Google Scholar
VERNAY, H.
1967Un système logique comme cadre d’une étude comparative de deux structures, La linguistique 1; pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
WANDRUSZKA, M.
1968L’aspect verbal, problème de traduction, Linguistica Antverpiensia II; pp. 459–476.Google Scholar