Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 39/40 (1978) ► pp.7392
References
Bailey, N., Madden, C., and S. Krashen
, Is there a natural sequence for adult second language learning? Language Learning 241 1974 : 235–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braine, M.
, On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In Slobin, D. (ed.) The Ontogenisis of Language. New York : Academic Press 1971 : 153–186.Google Scholar
Brown, R.
, A First Language. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard Press 1973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C., and U. Bellugi
, The child’s grammar from I to III. In Ferguson, C. and D. Slobin (eds) Studies in Child Language Development. New York : Holt Rinehart Winston 1973 : 295–333.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and C. Hanlon
. Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. (ed.) Cognition and the Development of Language. New York : Wiley 1970 : 11–53.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. and M. Robbins
, Toward assessing inter1anguage performance : The relationship between selected errors, learner’s characteristics, and learner’s explanations. Language Learning 261 1976: 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Covitt, G. and C. Stafford
An investigation of the Monitor Theory. Presentation at the UCLA-USC Second Language Acquisition Forum, UCLA, May 25, 1976.
Dulay, H. and M. Burt
. Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 231 1973 : 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 241 1974 : 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, A new approach to discovering universal strategies of child second language acquisition. In : Dato, D. (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press 1975 : 159–178.Google Scholar
, Remarks on creativity in languae acquisition. In : Burt, M., Dulay, H., and M. Finocchiaro (eds) Viewpoints on English as a Second Language. New York : Regents 1977.Google Scholar
Duškova, L.
On sources of error in foreign language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics 41 1969 : 11–36.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.
Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 101 1976 : 157–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The monitor model for adult second language performance. In : Burt, M., Dulay, H., and M. Finocchiaro (eds) Viewpoints on English as a Second Language. New York : Regents 1977a.Google Scholar
Second Language acquisition. In : Dingwall, W. (ed.) Survey of Linguistic Science. Greylock 1977b.Google Scholar
Individual variation in the use of the Monitor. In : Ritchie, W. (ed.) Principles of Second Language Learning and Teaching. New York : Academic Press 1977c.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. and H. Seliger
. The essential contributions of formal instruction in adult second language lear-ning. TESOL Quarterly 91 1975 : 173–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. and P. Pon
, An error analysis of an advanced ESL learner : The importance of the Monitor. Working Papers on Bilingualism 71 1975 : 125–129.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., Sferlazza, V., Feldman, L. and A. Fathman
, Adult performance on the SLOPE test : More evidence for a natural sequence in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 261 1976 : 145–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., Houck, N., Giunchi, P., Bode, S., Birnbaum, R., and G. Strei
Difficulty order for grammatical morphemes for adult second language performers using free speech. TESOL Quarterly (in press).
Larsen-Freeman, D.
The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 91 1975a : 409–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult learners of English as a second language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan 1975b.Google Scholar
Newport, E. Motherese
: The speech of mothers to young children. In : Castellan, N., Pisoni, D. and G. Potts (eds) Cognitive Theory Vol. II. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc 1976.Google Scholar
Reber, A.
Implicit learning of synthetic languages : The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory, 21 1976 : 88–95.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W.
Modern English, Vol. I1. Second Edition. New York : Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich 1975.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.
, Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In : Ferguson, D. and D. Slobin (eds.) Studies in Child Language Development. New York : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston 1973 : 175–208.Google Scholar
Snow, C.
, Language acquisition and mother’s speech to children. Child Development XLIII1 1972 : 549–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner-Gough, J. and E. Hatch
, The importance of input data in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning 251 1975 : 297–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Abraham, Roberta G.
1983. Relationships Between Use of the Strategy of Monitoring and the Cognitive Style. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Andersen, Roger W.
1978. AN IMPLICATIONAL MODEL FOR SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH. Language Learning 28:2  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Blanche, Patrick
1990. Using standardized achievement and oral proficiency tests for self-assessment purposes: the DLIFLC study. Language Testing 7:2  pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Davies, Norman F.
1980. Language acquisition, language learning and the school curriculum. System 8:2  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
FRANTZEN, DIANA
1995. The Effects of Grammar Supplementation on Written Accuracy in an Intermediate Spanish Content Course. The Modern Language Journal 79:3  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Hjalmar Punla, Hernandez
2017. Direct Instruction in Second Language Acquisition: A Critical Review of Related Literature. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 7:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Horner, David
1987. Acquisition, learning and the monitor: A critical look at Krashen. System 15:3  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Krashen, Stephen D.
1981. THE “FUNDAMENTAL PEDAGOGICAL PRINCIPLE” IN SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING. Studia Linguistica 35:1-2  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Krashen, Stephen D.
1981. LETTER TO THE EDITOR. Language Learning 31:1  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
McLaughlin, Barry
1978. THE MONITOR MODEL: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. Language Learning 28:2  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
McLaughlin, Barry
1980. THEORY AND RESEARCH IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: AN EMERGING PARADIGM 1. Language Learning 30:2  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Narang, Vaishna, Salonee Priya & Varalakshmi Chaudhry
2016. Second Language Acquisition in Mixed Ability Classrooms: Seminar Speech Task (SST). In Second Language Acquisition in Multilingual and Mixed Ability Indian Classrooms,  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Narang, Vaishna, Salonee Priya & Varalakshmi Chaudhry
2016. Revisiting the Issues in Learner Language Research in Indian Mixed Ability Classrooms. In Second Language Acquisition in Multilingual and Mixed Ability Indian Classrooms,  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Pica, Teresa
1988. Morpheme Data Analysis in Second Language Acquisition Research. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 79-80  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Russell, Robert A.
1985. An analysis of student errors in the use of Japanese ‐WA and ‐GA∗. Paper in Linguistics 18:2  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Yedavelly Srinivas Reddy
2022. Inculcation of Communicative Skills. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology  pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
김언조
2018. The Benefits of Formative Feedback for Critical Writing in EFL Context. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 26:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.