Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 6 (1969) ► pp.29–33

On The Relative Importance of Feedback Loops in Speech

| Neurolinguistics Department and NeurosurgicalC1inic, University of Brussels
Published online: 1 January 1969
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.6.03leb
References (20)
References
Chase R., Harvey S., Standfast S., Rapin I., Sutton S. (1959). Comparison of the Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Speech and Key Tapping. Science 1291: 903–904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunker E., Schlosshauer B. (1964). Irregularities in the Laryngeal Vibratory Pattern in Healthy and Hoarse Persons. Research in Voice Physiology, edited by D. Brewer (New York, State University of New York) 151–184.Google Scholar
Fairbanks G. (1955). Selective Vocal Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 201: 333–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks G., Guttman N. (1958). Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback Upon Articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 11: 12–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fry D. (1954). The Experimental Study of Speech. Nature 1731: 844–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1957). Speech and Language. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology 711:434–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser L. (1936). Das Hören der eigenen Sprache. Archives néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale 121: 78–80.Google Scholar
Kalmus H., Denes P., Fry D. (1955). Effect of Delayed Acoustic Feedback on Some Non-Vocalic Activities. Nature 1751: p. 1078. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kloster Jensen M. (1960). Rôle du contrôle auditif dans la production des accents dits de mot des langues Scandinaves. Word 161: 28–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics (London, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lane H., Catania A., Stevens S. (1961). Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness, and Effects of Sidetone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 331: 160–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee B. (1950). Some Effects of Side-Tone Delay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 221: 639–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1950). Effects of Delayed Speech Feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 221: 824–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1951). Artificial Stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 161: 53–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacNeilage P., Rootes T., Chase R. (1967). Speech Production and Perception in a Patient with Severe Impairment of Somesthetic Perception and Motor Control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 101: 449–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCroskey R. (1958). The Relative Contribution of Auditory and Tactile Clues to Certain Aspects of Speech. Southern Speech Journal 241: 84–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Eppler W. (1956). Verzögerte Rückkopplung als Mittel der Stimmforschung. Elektronische Rundschau 101: 91–93.Google Scholar
Meyer-Eppler W., Luchsinger R. (1955). Beobachtungen bei der verzögerten Rückkopplung der Sprache. Folia Phoniatrica 71: 87–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schliesser H., Coleman R. (1968). Effectiveness of Certain Procedures for Alteration of Auditory and Oral Tactile Sensation for Speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 261: 275–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith W., McCrary J., Smith K. (1960). Delayed Visual Feedback and Behavior. Science 1321:1013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar