Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 71 (1986) ► pp. 117
References

References

BENSOUSSAN, M.
(1983): Dictionaries and tests of reading comprehension. ELT Journal 87, 4, 341–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
BENSOUSSAN, M., D. SIM & R. WEISS
(1981): The Effect of Dictionary Usage on EFL Test Performance. Compared with Student and Teacher Attitudes and Expectations. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds): Aila 81 Proceedings, 216–217.Google Scholar
BENSOUSSAN, M. & R. RAMRAZ
(1983): The Fill-in Test: Combining Multiple-Choice and Modified Cloze Techniques to Test English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. Paper read at the 7th International Language testing Symposium. University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
BIALYSTOK, E. & J. HOWARD
(1979): Inferencing as an aspect of cloze test performance. Working Papers on Bilingualism 17:24–36.Google Scholar
BORMUTH, J.
(1969): Factor validity of cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 4, 358–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CARROLL, J.B.
(1961): Fundamental considerations in testing for English language proficiency of foreign students. H.B. Allen & R.N. Campbell (eds) (1972): Teaching English as a second language: a book of readings. New York: McGraw-Hill: 313–321.Google Scholar
CHASE, C.I.
(1972): Test of English as a second language. A review in O.V. Buros (ed.): Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park N.J.Google Scholar
HARRIS, D.
(1969): Testing English as a second language. New York. Mc. Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
Het Certificaat Nederlands als vreemde taal
(1983): Brochure uigegeven door het Commissariaat- generaal voor de International Culturele Samenwerking van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en het Minsiterie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen van Nederland. Brussel – 's Gravenhage.Google Scholar
HINOFOTIS, F.B.
(1976): An investigation of the concurrent validity of cloze testing as a measure of overall proficiency in English as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. South Illinois University.Google Scholar
HISAMA, K.K.
(1980): An analysis of various ESL proficiency tests. J.W. Oller & K. Perkins (eds): Research in Language testing. Rowley, Mass., 47–53.Google Scholar
HUGHES, A.J. & A.J. WOODS
(1981): Unitary Competence and Cambridge Proficiency. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds): AILA 81. Proceedings, 193.Google Scholar
INGRAM, E.
(1968): Item Analysis. A. Davies (ed.): Language Testing Symposium. London, O.U.P., 192–203.Google Scholar
LEE, Y.P.
(1979): Is there a global factor of language proficiency? Unpublished Ph.D. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
LEE, Y.P. & G.D. LOW
(1981): Classifying tests of language use. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds): AILA 81 Proceedings, 213–214.Google Scholar
LOOIJMANS, P. & H. PALM
(1979): Tekstbegrip getoetst? Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 1–3.Google Scholar
OLLER, J.W.
(1976): Evidence for a general language proficiency factor: An expectancy grammar. Die Neueren Sprachen 2, 165–171.Google Scholar
(1976): Language tests at school. London, Longman.Google Scholar
OLLER, J.W. & F.B. HINOFITIS
(1976): Two mutually exclusive hypotheses about second language ability: indivisible or partially divisible competence. J.W. Oller & K. Perkins (eds): Research in Language Testing. Rowley, Mass., 13–23.Google Scholar
POWERS, D.E.
(1982): Selecting samples for testing the hypothesis of divisible versus unitary competence in language proficiency. Language Learning, 32, 3, 331–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
RAATZ, U.
(1982): Language theory and factor analysis. M. Lut jeharms & T. Culhane (eds): Practice and problems in language testing 3, Brussel, 30–56.Google Scholar
ROHRER, J.
(1981): Problems and practice in language testing: A view from the Bundessprachenamt. C. Klein-Braley & D.K. Stevenson (eds): Practice and problems in language testing 1, 31–34.Google Scholar
SCHOLZ, G. HENDRICKS, D., JOHNSON, M. & VANDENBURG, L.
(1980): Is language ability divisible or unitary? A factor analysis of 22 English language proficiency tests. J.W. Oiler & K. Perkins (ed.): Research in Language testing. Rowley, Mass., 24–33.Google Scholar
SHOHAMY, E.
(1982): Predicting Speaking Proficiency from Cloze Tests: theoretical and practical considerations for test substitution. Applied Linguistics Vol. 3, nr. 2, 161–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
SPOLSKY
(1973): What does it mean to know a language; or how do you get someone to perform his competence? F.W. Oller & J.C. Richards (eds): Focus on the learner: pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher. Rowley, Mass; 164–176.Google Scholar
SWINTON, S.S. & D.E. POWERS
(1980): Factor Analysis of the Test of English as a Foreign Language for Several Language Groups. TOEFL Research Report Nr. 6. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
VOLLMER, H.J.
(1981): Receptive vs. productive competence? Models, findings and psycho-linguistic considerations in L2-testing. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds.): Aila 81 Proceed-ings, 208–209.Google Scholar
WESDORP, H.
(1979): Over het toetsen van het schrijfvermogen in het moedertaalonderwijs. J.F. Matter (ed.): Taaltoetsen in onderwijs en onderzoek. ABLA-papers, nr. 1, 28–46.Google Scholar
: (1981): Evaluatietechnieken voor het moedertaalonderwijs. Staatsuitgeverij. Den Haag.Google Scholar
WESTHOFF, G.J.
(1981): Voorspellend lezen. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar
WIJGH, I.F.
(1982): Reading comprehension and authentic texts. M. Lut jeharms & T. Culhane (eds): Practice and Problems in Language testing 3, Brussel, 82–87.Google Scholar