Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 79/80 (1988) ► pp.1–23
Is Morphology used to encode Derivations when Learning a Foreign Language?
Derived words suggest a very efficient mnemonic when they have to be learnt as items in a foreign language (FL). They could be remembered by tagging in semantic memory the property that is lexicalized by the stem and storing the particular affix. A learning experiment was designed to find out whether students make spontaneous use of this encoding strategy. The results indicated that subjects' recall performance was better for derived words than underived ones, even when the presence of stems was not pointed out to them by the experimenter. The error data were compatible with the use of the proposed mnemonic. Surprisingly, subjects who were given only native language translations did better on the derivations than those who were provided additional comment on the morphological structure of these words. This finding proves that the method of giving translations for FL words is not so bad after ail and that the memory representations subjects form in such conditions are not necessarily of the paired-associate type.
References (13)
Atkinson, R.C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 301, 821–828. 
Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing : a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 111, 671–684.
Decoo, W. (1985). Ken je de woordjes? Info-Frans, 131, 45–60.
Freyd, P. & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 211, 282–295.
Godin, P. & Ostyn, P. (1984). L’enseignement des langues étrangères : hier, aujourd’hui et demain. Relations Publiques, Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Namur (ed.), FUN Infor (Agenda Mai 1984).
Hall, J.W., Wilson, K.P. & Patterson, R.J. (1980). Mnemotechnics. Some limitations on the mnemonic keyword method for the study of foreign language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 721, 345–357.
Paivio, A. & Desrochers, A. (1981). Mnemonic techniques in second-language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 731, 780–795.
Pressley, M., Levin, J.R., Hall, J.W., Miller, G.E. & Berry, J.K. (1980). The keyword method and foreign word acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory, 61, 163–173.
Pressley, M., Levin, J.R., Kuiper, N.A., Bryant, S.L. & Michener, S. (1982). Mnemonic versus nonmnemonic vocabulary-learning strategies : additional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 741, 693–707.
Raugh, M.R. & Atkinson, R.C. (1975). A mnemonic method for learning a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 671, 1–16.
Taft, M. & Forster, K.I. (1975), Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647.
Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 201, 289–297.
Stanners, R.F., Neiser, J.J., Hernon, W.P. & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 181, 399–412.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Sandra, Dominiek
1994. The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes 9:3 ► pp. 227 ff. 
Sandra, Dominiek
1997. Morphological Awareness and the Second Language Learner. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ► pp. 63 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.