Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 79/80 (1988) ► pp.77112
References

Bibliography

Andersen, R.
1977The impoverished state of cross-sectional morpheme acquisition/accuracy methodology. Working Papers on Bilingualism 141 : 47–82.Google Scholar
1978An implicational model for second language research. Language Learning 28 : 221–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984What’s gender good for, anyway? In R. Andersen (ed.). Second Languages : A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bailey, N.C., C. Madden, and S.D. Krashen
1974Is there a natural sequence in adult second language learning? Language Learning 271 : 235-44 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1975The nature of a creole continuum. Language 491 : 640–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
1983The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies : the case of systematicity. Language Learning 331 : 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
1973A first Language. Cambridge : Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, L.J.
1975The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rales, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 4, 401–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. and M. Burt
1973Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 231 : 245-258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay H. and M. Burt
1974aNatural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 241 : 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974bA new perspective on the creative construction process in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 241 : 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fathman, A.
1975The relationship between age and second language productive ability. Language Learning 251 : 245–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978ESL and EFL learning : Similar or dissimilar? In Blatchford, C. and J. Schacter (eds.), On TESOL ‘78 : EFL Policies, Programs, Practices. Washington, D.C. : TESOL.Google Scholar
Felix, S.
1977Repetitive orders in child language. Lingua 241 : 25–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faerch, C. and G. Kesper
1983Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London : Longman.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K.
1976A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning 261 : 321–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K and H. Cancino
1977Trends in second language acquisition research. Harvard Educational Review 471 : 294–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, B.
1984Age as a factor in acquisition of French as a second language in an immersion setting. In R. Andersen (ed.). Second Languages : A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hatch, E.
1983Psycholinguistics. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Huebner, T.
1983A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English. Ann Arbor : Karoma.Google Scholar
1984System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning 351 : 141–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
1977Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning 271 : 382–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kessler, D. and I. Idar
1977The acquisition of English syntac structures by a Vietnamese child. Paper presented at the National Association for Bilingual Education. Annual Convention, New Orleans, Louisiana. In H. Dulay, M. Burt and S. Krashen, Language two; 1982 Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S.
1978bThe monitor model for second language acquisition. In Gingras, R. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Arlington, CA.Google Scholar
1979A response to McLaughlin, ‘the monitor model : some methodological considerations’. Language Learning 281 : 309–32.Google Scholar
1981Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., J. Butler, R. Birnbaum, and J. Robertson
1978Two studies in language acquisition and language learning. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 39-401 : 73–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Two studies in language acquisition and language learning. IRAL 161 : 17–22.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., N. Houch, P. Guinchi, S. Bode, R. Birnbaum, and G. Strei
1978Difficulty order for grammatical morphemes for adult second language performers using free speech. TESOL Quarterly 111 : 338–41.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., C. Madden, and N Bailey
1978Theoretical aspects of grammatical sequencing. In Burt, M. and H. Dulay (eds.), New Directions in Second Language Learning and Teaching and Bilingual Education. Washington, D.C. : TESOL.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
1975The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESLstudents. TESOL Quarterly 91 : 409–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.
1983Explaining relationship between developmental and instructional sequences in second language acquisition. In Seliger, H. and M. Long (eds.), Classroom Research on Sexond Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass. : Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. and C. Sato
1984Methodological issues in interlanguage studies : an interactionist perspective. In A. Davies, C. Griper, and A. Howatt (eds.). Interlanguage. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 253–79.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.
1977Linguistic simplifications : a study of immigrant workers’ speech and foreigner talk. In Corder, S. and R. Roulet (eds.) The Notion of Simplification, Interlanguages and Pidgins and Their Relation to Second Language Pedagogy. Geneva.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., H. Clashen, and M. Piennemann
1981On determining developmental stages in naturalistic second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31 : 109–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
1982Second Language Acquisition in Different Language Contexts. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1983Adult acquisition of English under different conditions of L2 exposure. Language Learning 33,4 : 465–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. and M. Johnston
1986Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. Paper commissioned by the Committee of Review of the Adult Migrant Education Program, Sydney, Australia.
Richards, J.
1974Error analysis and second language strategies, in J. Schumann and N. Stenson (eds.) New Frontiers in Second Language Learning. Rowley, Mass. : Newbury House, 32–53.Google Scholar
Selinker, L.
1972Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 101 : 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stauble, A.M.
A comparison of a Spanish-English and Japanese-English second language continuum : negation and verb morphology. In R. Andersen ed. Second Languages : A Cross-Linguistic Perspective Rowley, MA Newbury House
Staubte, A.M.
A comparison of a Spanish-English and Japanese-English second language continuum : negation and verb morphology. In R. Andersen ed. Second languages : A cross-Linguistic Perspective Rowley, MA Newbury House
Tarone, E.
1985Variability in interlanguage use : a study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning 351 : 373–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B.
1975The use of overgeneralization and transfer learning strategies by elementary and intermediate students in ESL. Language Learning 321 : 53–68.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt
1985Variability in tense marking : a case for the obvious. Language Learning 321 : 229–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa
1982On tense alternation and the need for analysis of native speaker usage in second language acquisition. Language Learning 321 : 53–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, R.
1985The acquisition of a verbal repertoire in a second language. Ms., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zobl, H.
1983Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning 33, 3 : 293–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Boulouffe, Jacqueline
2009. Une place pour la pédagogie en didactique des langues. Revue québécoise de linguistique 21:1  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Rahkonen, Matti & Taina Juurakko
1998. Logit analysis in L2 research: measuring L1 and L2/Ln effects. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.