Cover not available
Part of
Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 35–56

Humor and advertising in Twitter

An approach from the General Theory of Verbal Humor and Metapragmatics

| Università di Bologna
| Universidad de Sevilla
Irony and verbal humor play a leading role in computer-mediated discourses. Irony, for instance, is mainly used to criticise politics and politicians in Twitter, while verbal humor contributes to strengthen social relations in Twitter or Facebook. In this paper, we focus on humor in order to explore more in deep its mechanisms, function, and effects within Twitter “conversations” between Spanish companies or public institutions and microblog users. Assuming the main premises of the General Theory of Verbal Humor and adopting a metapragmatic approach, this research aims at identifying the knowledge resources at work when humor is used as an advertising strategy; as well as categorizing these tweets according to the types of logical mechanisms adopted by the interactants to solve the script-opposition in which humor is based. The analysis proves that verbal and visual humor is a strategy adopted by most companies and institutions in order to give visibility to their products and services and to reinforce the social ties with their potential customers.
Keywords: General Theory of Verbal Humor, Metapragmatics, Twitter, Spanish advertising
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.General Theory of Verbal Humor and Metapragmatics
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Results of the analysis
    • 4.1Twitter “conversations” and humor
    • 4.2A taxonomy of humorous tweets with propagandistic purposes
      • 4.2.1Humorous tweets based on script-oppositions
      • 4.2.2Humor based on exaggeration
      • 4.2.3Humorous tweets based on graphic information
      • 4.2.4Humorous tweets based on current news
      • 4.2.5Tweets based on parody and intertextuality
      • 4.2.6Ironic tweets
      • 4.2.7Humor responding to an attack or a complaint
      • 4.2.8The customer as a target
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.03ala
References (53)
Bibliography
Alvarado Ortega, M. Belén. 2013. “An approach to verbal humor in interaction.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 95: 594–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alvarado Ortega, M. Belén, and Leonor Ruiz Gurillo. 2013. Humor, ironía y géneros textuales. San Vicente del Raspeig: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
Antonopoulou, Eleni, and Maria Sifianou. 2003. “Conversational dynamics of humor: The telephone game in Greek.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 741–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2001. Humorous texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “A primer for the linguistics of humor.” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin. 1991. “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4): 293–347.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, F. Christian Hempelmann, and Sara Di Maio. 2002. “Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modelling incongruities and their resolutions.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 16–2: 3–46.Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, Antonio. 2007. “Límites para el análisis de la conversación. Órdenes y unidades: turno, intervención y diálogo.” RILI. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 1(9): 23–27.Google Scholar
Bruzos Moro, Alberto. 2009. “La polifonía.” In Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and Xosé A. Padilla García, 45–54. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carranza Márquez, Aurelia. 2010. “The faces of humor: humor as a catalyst of face in the context of the British and the Spanish Parliament.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 23–4: 467–504.Google Scholar
Catanescu, Codrita, and Gail Tom. 2001. “Types of humor in television and magazine advertising.” Review of Business 22 (1–2): 92–94.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2012. “El discurso de la propaganda. Un intento de tipologización.” In Los géneros discursivos desde múltiples perspectivas: teorías y análisis, ed. by Martha Shiro, >Patrick Charaudeau, and Luisa Granato, 125–138. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Davies, Christie. 2011. “Logical mechanisms: A critique.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 24 (2): 159–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fant, Lars. 1996. “Regulación conversacional en la negociación: una comparación entre pautas mexicanas y peninsulares.” In El español hablado y la cultura oral en España e Hispanoamérica, ed. by Thomas Kotschi, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Klaus Zimmermann, 147–183. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Flaherty, Karen, Marc G. Weinberger, and Charles S. Gulas. 2004. “The Impact of Perceived Humor, Product Type, and Humor Style in Radio Advertising.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26 (1): 25–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gombert, Jean E. 1992. Metalinguistic development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gulas, Charles S., and Marc G. Weinberger. 2006. Humor in Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1985. “La ironía verbal: análisis pragmalingüístico.” Revista Española de Lingüística 15 (2): 343–391.Google Scholar
Hempelmann, Christian F. 2004. “Script Oppositeness and Logical Mechanism in Punning.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 17 (4): 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hempelmann, Christian F., and Salvatore Attardo. 2011. “Resolutions and Their Incongruities: Further Thoughts on Logical Mechanisms.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 24 (2): 125–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra. 2002a. “Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction.” In Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, ed. by Anna Duszak, 377–400. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. “Over the edge? Subversive humour between colleagues and friends.” HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 15 (1): 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., and Sam Glucksberg. 1989. “How to be sarcastic: the echoic reminder theory of verbal irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 118 (4): 374–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown. 1995. “How about another Piece of Pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 124: 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mancera Rueda, Ana. 2014. “El sexismo como blanco del humor en las redes sociales.” Feminismo/s 24: 163–192.Google Scholar
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán. 2013a. El discurso político en Twitter. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
. 2013b. El español coloquial en las redes sociales. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Uta Helfrich. 2014. “La crisis en 140 caracteres: el discurso propagandístico en la red social Twitter.” Cultura, lenguaje y representación 12: 59–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-García de Paredes, Elena. 2013. “Discursive mechanisms of informative humor in Spanish media.” In Irony and Humor: From pragmatics to discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 85–106. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2003. “Issues in conversational joking.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1333–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla García, Xosé A. 2013. “Cartoons in Spanish press: a pragmatic approach.” In Irony and Humor: From pragmatics to discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 141–158. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla García, Xosé A., and Elisa Gironzetti. 2012. “Humor e ironía en las viñetas cómicas periodísticas: un estudio pragmático-intercultural.” In Pragmática y comunicación intercultural en el mundo hispanohablante, ed. by María Elena Placencia, and Carmen García, 93–133. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Pano Alamán, Ana. 2015. “Ironía verbal y actividad de imagen en el discurso de políticos y ciudadanos españoles en Twitter.” Sociocultural Pragmatics/ Pragmática sociocultural, 3 (1): 59–89.Google Scholar
Pano Alamán, Ana, and Ana Mancera Rueda. 2014a. “Identidades falsas en Twitter: la ironía y el humor verbal como mecanismos paródicos.” In “Discurso e identidad en el ciberespacio hispano”, ed. by María Elena Placencia, and Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez. Discurso & Sociedad 8 (3): 507–536.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “La ‘conversación’ en Twitter: las unidades discursivas y el uso de marcadores interactivos en los intercambios con parlamentarios españoles en la red social.” In Unidades de segmentación en el discurso, ed. by Luis Cortés. Estudios de Lingüística del español 35 (1): 234–268.Google Scholar
Poon, James, and Teng Fatt. 2002. “When business can be fun.” Management Research News, 25 (1): 39–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
. 2008. The Primer of Humor Research. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Graciela. 2002. Metapragmática. Lenguaje sobre el lenguaje, ficciones, figuras. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana. 2013. “The power of inversion: Irony, from utterance to discourse.” In Irony and Humor: From pragmatics to discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 17–38. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. 2012. La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor, Xosé A. Padilla García, Carmen Marimón Llorca, and Larissa Timofeeva. 2004. “El proyecto GRIALE para la ironía en español: conceptos previos.” Estudios de lingüística 18: 231–242.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor, and Xosé A. Padilla García (eds.). 2009. Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega. 2013. Irony and Humor: From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Mark. W. 2012. The Tao of Twitter. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, Larissa. 2009. “Las unidades fraseológicas.” In Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and Xosé A. Padilla García, 193–217. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use.” In Pragmatique et psychologie, ed. by Josie Bernicot, 57–72. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Du Bois, Inke
2024. Age and gender differences in meme humor: a multimodal variationist mixed-method approach. Multimodal Communication DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2023. Humour on Social Networking Sites. In Pragmatics of Internet Humour, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Ping
2019. Language and Visual Communication. In The Role of Language and Symbols in Promotional Strategies and Marketing Schemes [Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services, ], ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Elers, Steve & Phoebe Elers
2018. Tāme Iti and Twitter: a voice from prison. Media International Australia 169:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.