Chapter published in:
The Intricacy of Languages
Edited by Francesc Feliu and Olga Fullana
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 20] 2019
► pp. 1222
References

References

Ara, Pooneh M., Ryan G. James, and James P. Crutchfield
2016 “Elusive Present: Hidden Past and Future Dependency and Why We Build Models”. Physical Review E 93: 022143 (11 p). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Ian Roberts, Michelle Sheehan, and Anders Holmberg
2014 “Complexity in Comparative Syntax: The View from Modern Parametric Theory”. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel B. Preston, 103–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Union
2005 “European and Languages”. Special Eurobarometer 237, Wave 63.4, TNS Opinion & Social. Brussels: European Comission [http://​ec​.europa​.eu​/public​_opinion​/archives​/ebs​/ebs​_237​.en​.pdf; consulted in december 2016]
Fought, John
1982 “The Reinvention of Hugo Schuchardt (Review article)”. Language in Society 11 (3): 419–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gil, David
2014 “Sign Languages, Creoles, and the Development of Predication”. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel B. Preston, 37–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Mirjana
2009 “Dekonstrukcija historije ili svijet bez prošlosti” [The Deconstruction of History or the World without a Past]. Historijski zbornik 62 (1): 165–195.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2014 “Major Contributions from Formal Linguistics to the Complexity Debate”. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel B. Preston, 14–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Infoterm
2005Guidelines for Terminology Policies. Formulating and implementing terminology policy in language communities. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Ivić, Milka
1996Tendencies in Linguistics. Belgrade: Čigoja Press.Google Scholar
Kageura, Kyo
2002The Dynamics of Terminology: A Descriptive Theory of Term Formation and Terminological Growth. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalezić, Maja
2016 “The Status of the Serbian Terminology Defined by the Serbian Language Policy throughout its Contemporary and Future Plans”. In Lexicology and lexicography in the light of contemporary approaches, ed. by Stana Ristić, Ivana Lazić Konjik, and Nenad Ivanović, 237–248. Belgrade: The Institute for Serbian Language of SASA.Google Scholar
Kostić, Milena
2011 “Bograndovo vidjenje diskurzivnog i dekonstrukcijskog proučavanja jezika” [Beaugrande’s view of discursive and deconstructive study of language]. Philologia Mediana 3: 319–334.Google Scholar
Markov, Andrei Andreyevich
1907Issledovanie zamechatel’nogo sluchaya zavisimyh ispytanij [Research on a remarkable case of independent tests], Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Saint Petersburg, VI seriya 1 (93), 61–80.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson
(eds.) 2008Language Complexity. Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Laurel B. Preston
(eds.) 2014aMeasuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “Introduction”. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, 1–13 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OS
1998New Etymological Dictionary of Serbian language. Belgrade: The Institute for Serbian language of SASA (Sample volume).Google Scholar
Radovanović, Milorad
1979Sociolingvistika [Sociolinguistics]. Belgrade: BIGZ.Google Scholar
Ross, Daniel
2014 “The Importance of Exhaustive Description in Measuring Linguistic Complexity: The Case of English Try and Pseudocoordination”. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel B. Preston, 202–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sager, Juan C.
1990A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sekulić, Nada
2002 “Postmodernizam i kraj antropologije” [Postmodernism and the end of anthropology]. Sociologija [Sociology] 44 (4): 343–366.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
2009 “Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity. Typology, contact, change” STUF – Language Typology and Universals Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 62 (3): 241–242.Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas and Jan-Wouter Zwart
2014 “The Complexity of Narrow Syntax: Minimalism, Representational Economy, and Simplest Merge”. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel B. Preston, 128–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vajs, Nada
2003Hrvatska povijesna fitonimija [Croation historical Phytonymy]. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.Google Scholar