Cover not available
Part of
From Verbal Periphrases to Complex Predicates
Edited by Mar Garachana Camarero, Sandra Montserrat Buendia and Claus Dieter Pusch
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 31] 2022
► pp. 41–61

Come che al à vût dit

On the semantics of the formes surcomposées in Friulian

ORCID logo | University of Graz
Double compound forms (DCF) are widespread in European languages, especially in Romance and Germanic languages, and could be considered a Sprachbund phenomenon. In this article, I focus on DCF in Friulian. First, I will provide a morphosyntactic description of DCF in this language and analyze their syntactic behavior. Second, the results of a corpus-based analysis will be presented, as well as the results of an acceptability test with Friulian informants. Third, based on the analyzed data it will be illustrated that DCF may indeed convey different semantic values, but that the expression of experientiality can be seen as the core value.
Keywords: double compound forms, Friulian, Romance and Germanic languages, experientiality, semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.DCF in Friulian
    • 2.1Morphosyntactic description
    • 2.2Syntactic behavior
    • 2.3Semantic values
  • 3.An empirical approach to Friulian DCF
    • 3.1The analyzed data
    • 3.2The occurrences
      • 3.2.1DCF as experientials
      • 3.2.2Other semantic values
      • 3.2.3An acceptability test
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.31.03mel
References (46)
References
Aboh, Enoch O., Norval Smith, and Anne Zribi–Hertz, Anne. 2012. Reduplication beyond the word level. A cross–linguistic view. In The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non–Creole–Languages [Creole Language Library 43], ed. by Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith, and Anne Zribi–Hertz, 1–26. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra J. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ammann, Andreas. 2007. The fate of ‘redundant’ verbal forms – Double perfect constructions in the languages of Europe. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 60 (3): 186–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apothéloz, Denis. 2009. La quasi-synonymie du passé composé et du passé surcomposé dit ‘régional’. Pratiques 141–142: 98–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Le passé surcomposé et la valeur de parfait existentiel. French Language Studies 20: 105–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. La concurrence du passé composé et du passé surcomposé dans l’expression de la valeur de parfait d’expérience. Études de sémantique et pragmatique françaises [SC! Sciences pour la communication 98], ed. by Louis de Saussure and Alain Rihs, 39–65. Bern et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der. 1998. Conclusion. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe [EALT/EUROTYP 20–3], ed. by Johan van der Auwera, 813–836. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Begotti, Pier Carlo, and Federico Vicario. 2005. Peraulis di chenti. Storie, lenghe e culture in Friûl. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1989. Friaulisch: Interne Sprachgeschichte I. Grammatik / Evoluzione della grammatica. In Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik (LRL), vol. III: Die einzelnen romanischen Sprachen und Sprachgebiete von der Renaissance bis zur Gegenwart. Rumänisch, Dalmatisch/Istroromanisch, Friaulisch, Ladinisch, Bündnerromanisch, ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin, and Christian Schmitt, 563–585. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Buchwald-Wargenau, Isabel. 2008. Zur Herausbildung der doppelten Perfektbildungen. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen. Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, vol. I: Diachronie, Althochdeutsch, Mittelhochdeutsch, ed. by Arne Ziegler, 221–235. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2012. Die doppelten Perfektbildungen im Deutschen. Eine diachrone Untersuchung [Studia linguistica Germanica 115]. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bürgi, Anne. 2007. Analyse de l’émergence du sens du surcomposé. In Variation et stabilité du français. Des notions aux opérations. Mélanges de linguistique français offerts au professeur Jean-Marcel Léard par ses collègues et amis [Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 61], ed. by Pierre Larrivée, 34–49. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Camus Bergareche, Bruno. 2008. El perfecto compuesto (y otros tiempos compuestos) en las lenguas románicas: formas y valores. In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas [Lingüística Iberoamericana 34], ed. by Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez, 65–99. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Janice. 1993. The formes surcomposées: The discourse function and linguistic status of a rare form in contemporary spoken French. PhD Thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Caviglia, Serrana, and Marisa Malcuori. 1994. Perfecto compuesto: Deíctico de la enunciación. Consecuencias en el uso de Montevideo. In Actas do XIX Congreso Internacional de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 1989, vol. VI: Sección VI. Galego. Sección VII. Romania Nova, ed. by Ramón Lorenzo, 581–590. A Coruña: Fundación “Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde de Fenosa”.Google Scholar
Cornu, Maurice. 1953. Les formes surcomposées en français [Romanica Helvetica 42]. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1984. Temporal distance: remoteness distinctions in tense–aspect systems. In Explanations for Language Universals, ed. by Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie, and Östen Dahl, 105–122. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen, and Eva Hedin. 2000. Current relevance and event reference. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [EALT/EUROTYP 20–6], ed. by Östen Dahl, 385–401. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20 (3): 271–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross–linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language. Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 211–242. Mahwah, London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Havu, Jukka. 2012. Le Passé surcomposé dans le français classique. In Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique [Sciences pour la communication 101], ed. by Céline Guillot, Bernard Combettes, Alexei Lavrentiev, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux, and Sophie Prevost, 177–191. Bern et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2013. Le Passé surcomposé en français classique et moderne. In La Linguistique dans tous les sens [KVHAA Konferenser 80], ed. by Françoise Sullet-Nylander, Hugues Engel, and Gunnel Engwall, 37–57. Stockholm: Kungl. Vietterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar
Hedin, Eva. 2000. The type–referring function of the Imperfective. In Dahl (ed.), 227–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 2005. Périphrases aspectuelles et temps grammatical dans les langues romanes. In Les périphrases verbales [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 25], ed. by Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot and Nicole Le Queler, Nicole, 47–66. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 1997–1999. I tempi sovracomposti nel napoletano antico. L’Italia dialettale 60: 105–124.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Giuseppe. 1953. Lineamenti di grammatica friulana. Udine, Società Filologica Friulana.Google Scholar
Melchior, Luca. 2012. Tra esperienzialità e iteratività: il ‘passé surcomposé à valeur spéciale’ in francese (e in altri idiomi romanzi). Revue de Linguistique Romane 301–302: 65–98.Google Scholar
. 2013. Zur verbalen surcomposition im Friaulischen. In Akten des V. Rätoromanistischen Kolloquiums / Actas dal V. Colloqui retoromanistic Lavin 2011, ed. by Georges Darms, Clà Riatsch, and Clau Solèr, 163–188. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Nazzi, Gianni [= Nazzi Matalon, Žuan]. 1977. Marilenghe. Gramatiche furlane. Gorizia, Pordenone, Udine: Institût di studis furlans.Google Scholar
Paesani, Katherine A. 2001. The Syntax and Semantics of Passé Surcomposé in Modern French. PhD Thesis. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Plungian, Vladimir A., and Johan van der Auwera. 2006. Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(4): 317–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2008. Syntactic encoding of Aspect in some Northern Italian dialects. In Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed.), 499–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Double auxiliaries, anteriority and terminativity. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12: 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quintana i Font, Artur. 1998. Kontrastive Untersuchungen IV. Katalanisch und andere Sprachen / Análisis contrastivos IV. Gramática contrastiva del catalán. In Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik (LRL), vol. 7: Kontakt, Migration und Kunstsprachen. Kontrastivität, Klassifikation und Typologie. Langues en contact, langues des migrants et langues artificielles. Analyses contrastives, classification et typologie des langues romanes, ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin, and Christian Schmitt, 845–852. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Régnier, Claude. 1974. Passé simple, passé composé, passé surcomposé dans les parlers du Morvan. In Mélanges d’histoire littéraire, linguistique et de philologie romanes offerts à Charles Rostaing, vol. II, 855–870. Liège: Association Intercommunale de Mécanographie.Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de, and Bertrand Sthioul. 2012. The surcomposé past tense. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, ed. by Robert I. Binnick, 586–610. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaden, Gerhard. 2009. Composés et surcomposés. Le “parfait” en français, allemand, anglais et espagnol. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. 1971. Okzitanische und katalanische Verbprobleme. Ein Beitrag zur funktionellen synchronischen Untersuchung des Verbalsystems der beiden Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šesták, Antonin. 1933. Les temps surcomposés en français. Časopis pro moderní filologii 19: 186–195 and 292–307.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 1998. Verbal periphrases in Romance. Aspect, actionality and grammaticalization [Empirical approaches to language typology 21]. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura. 2007. Morfologjie. In Manuâl di lenghistiche furlane, ed. by Franc Fari [= Franco Fabbro], 83–113. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Vicario, Federico. 1997. I verbi analitici in Friuliano. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Viguier, Marie-Hélène. 2013. Tempussemantik. Das französische Tempussystem. Eine integrative Analyse [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 366]. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilmet, Marc. 2009. Le passé surcomposé sous la loupe. Journal of French Language Studies 19(3): 381–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, Reinard Willem. 1932. On the Perfect of Experience. English Studies 14(1–6): 11–20 and 76–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar