Cover not available
Part of
The Reality of Women in the Universe of the Ancient Novel
Edited by María Paz López Martínez, Carlos Sánchez-Moreno Ellart and Ana Belén Zaera García
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 40] 2023
► pp. 54–83

Chapter 4
Realidad de la institución matrimonial en la ficción de las novelas grecolatinas

 | Universidad de Valencia
The purpose of this work is to make evident how the informations about various aspects of the marriage institution contained in the Greco-Latin novels are not purely fictional data, but approximately respond to historical reality and are reliable enough to be contributed to the task of rebuilding a legal institution such as marriage in the particular eastern historical and geographical context of late Greco-Roman antiquity.
Keywords: affectio maritalis, donatio propter nuptias, dos, engýesis, epigamía, gámos, pollicitatio dotis, pretium virginitatis, proíx, raptus
Published online: 1 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.40.04cas
References (25)
Bibliografía
Bickerman, E. J. (1975). La conception du mariage à Athènes [The Design of Marriage in Athens]. BIDR, 78, 1–28.Google Scholar
Biscardi, A. (1934). I rapporti tra προίξ ed ἐγγύησις nel diritto matrimoniale attico [The Relationship between προίξ and ἐγγύησις in Attic Marriage law]. SIFC, 11, 57–80.Google Scholar
(1984–1985). Mariage d’amour et mariage sans amour en Grèce, à Rome et dans les evangiles [Marriage of Love and Marriage without Love in Greece, Rome and in the Gospels]. AFGG, 20, 205–213.Google Scholar
Calderini, A. (1959). La ἐγγύησις matrimoniale nei Romanzieri greci e nei papiri [The Marriage ἐγγύησις in Greek Novelists and Papyri]. Aegyptus, 39, 1–2, 29–39.Google Scholar
Calero Secall, I. M. (2005). Aristéneto y la realidad jurídica en torno a cuestiones matrimoniales [Aristenetos and the Legal Reality around Marriage Issues]. AMal, 17, [URL].
Casinos Mora, F. J. (2011). Lex raptarum y matrimonio expiatorio. In P. I. Carvajal & M. Miglietta (Eds.), Estudios jurídicos en homenaje al Profesor Alejandro Guzmán Brito, I (pp. 595–623). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Corbino, A. (2012). El matrimonio romano in età arcaica e republicana [Roman Marriage in Archaic and Republican Age]. Index, 40, 156–164.Google Scholar
Crespo Güemes, E. (1979). Heliodoro. Las Etiópicas o Teágenes y Cariclea. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Furiani, P. L. (1988). Gamos e kenogamion nel romanzo di Achille Tazio. Euphrosyne. Revista de filología clásica, 16, 271–280.Google Scholar
Hidalgo de la Vega, M. J. (1988). Los misterios y la magia en las Etiópicas de Heliodoro [Mysteries and Magic in the Heliodorus’ Aethiopica]. SHHA, 6, 175–189.Google Scholar
Kanavou, N. (2015). A Husband is More Important than a Child. The Endind of Chariton’s Callirhoe Revisited. Mnemosyne, 68, 944–949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortekaas, G. A. A. (2007). Commentary on the Historia Apollonii regis Tyri, Leiden-Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leduc, C. (1982). Réflexions sur le système matronial athénien à l’èpoque de la cité-état (VIe–IVe s. av. J.-C.). In Groupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaire d’Étude des Femmes (GRIEF), La dot ‒ la valeur des femmes (pp. 7–29). Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Midi (PUM).Google Scholar
(1990), Come darla in matrimonio? La sposa nel mondo greco (secoli IX–IV a.C.). In G. Georges Duby & M. Perrot (Eds.), Storia delle donne in Occidente. L’Antichità, I (pp. 246–314). Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
López Martínez, M. P. (1998). Fragmentos papiráceos de novela griega. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Servicio de publicaciones.Google Scholar
(2019). The Ninus Romance. New Textual and Contextual Studies. APF, 65, 20–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malavé Osuna, B. (2004). Pretium pudicitiae y donación nupcial [Pretium pudicitiae and Bridal Gift]. REHJ, 26, 61–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perentidis, S. (1993). Dévoilement rituel et cadeau nuptial en Grèce et Byzance: continuié ou rupture? [Ritual Unveiling and Bridal Gift in Greece and Byzantium: Continuity or Rupture?]. RD, 71.1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Puche López, M. C. (1997). Historia de Apolonio, rey de Tiro. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Radin, M. (1936). Legal History of the Morganatic Marriage. The University of Chicago Law Review, 4, 597–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherillo, G. (1929). Un papiro del V. sec. (PSI 1075) in materia di rapporti patrimoniali tra coniugi [A Papyrus of the 5th century (PSI 1075) on the Property Relationships between Spouses]. Rendiconti del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, 72, 276–280.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1898). Die Rolle des Geldes in den Beziehungen der Geschlechter. Fragment aus einer Philosophie des Geldes [The Role of Money in Gender Relations. Fragment from a Philosophy of Money]. Die Zeit, 14, 172–174, 38–40, 53f. and 69–71.Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. (2013). Il romanzo greco al servizio dell’erotica passionale nelle Lettere d’amore di Aristeneto. In O. Vox (Ed.), Lettere, mimesi retorica. Studi sull’epistolografia letteraria greca di età imperiale e tardo antica (pp. 411–455). Lecce-Brescia: Pensa multimedia.Google Scholar
Triantaphyllopoulos, J. (1988). Virginité et défloration masculines. In Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Papyrology. Athens 25‒31May 1986, II. Athens: Greek Papyrological Society.
Witt, R. E. (1971). Isis in the Graeco-Roman World (Aspects of Greek & Roman Life). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar