Cover not available
Part of
The Reality of Women in the Universe of the Ancient Novel
Edited by María Paz López Martínez, Carlos Sánchez-Moreno Ellart and Ana Belén Zaera García
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 40] 2023
► pp. 84–98

Chapter 5
La expositio en Dafnis y Cloe

Una visión jurídica

 | Universidad de Salamanca
From a legal point of view, we can affirm that the stories of the protagonists of Longo’s novel, Daphnis and Chloe, show the legal situation of the time, adapting the novel to local law. The literary fiction is not an obstacle to recognise that in the juridical field the work shows tints of reality, which proves that this literary genre constitutes a source of knowledge of Greek law.
Keywords: patria potestas, ius exponendi, law and novel
Published online: 1 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.40.05zae
References (43)
Bibliografía
Beauchet, L. (1976 reimp. 1897). Histoire du droit privé de la République athénienne II. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Bonnard, J. B. (2018). L’exposition des nouveau-nés handicapés dans le monde grec, entre réalités et mythes: un point sur la question. PALLAS 106, 229–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boswell. J. (1988). The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance, New York: University of Michigan Library.Google Scholar
Brioso Sánchez, M./ Crespo Güemes, E. (1982). Longo. Dafnis y Cloe, trad., Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Buis, E. J. (2017). ¿Por qué hablar hoy de Derecho griego antiguo? Aportes para una reflexión jurídica comprometida. Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires, 94, 3–12.Google Scholar
Calero, I. (1997). Leyes de Gortina, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
(2017). Derecho ático y ficción literaria: engýe, dote y sucesión en Eurípides, Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires, 94, 243–264.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1932). The Exposure of Children and Greek Ethics”, Classical Reviev 46, 105–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantarella, E. (1989). La vita delle donne. En A. Momigliano & A. Schiavone. Storia di Roma 4, (pp. 557–608), Torino: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Capogrossi, L. (1982). s.v. Patria potestà. En Enciclopedia del Diritto XXXII (pp. 242–245). Milano: Giuffrè Editore.Google Scholar
Casamento, A. (2019). Patres non tantum natura. L’expositio di minori nelle declamazioni in lingua latina: il caso di Ps. Quint. Decl. Min. 278. Camenae, 23, 1–12.Google Scholar
Castellini, B. – Paoli, U. E. (1932). s. v. espositi. En Enciclopedia Italiana, Roma: Istituto Giovanni Treccani.Google Scholar
Corbier, M. (2001). Child exposure and abandonment. En S. Dixon, Childhood, Class and kign in the Roman world (pp. 52–73). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edmonds, J. M. (1955). Daphnis and Chloe. London: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Evans Grubbs, J. (2013). Infant Exposure and Infanticide. En J. Evans Grubbs & T. Parkin (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Childhood and Education in the Classical World. Oxford; Oxford Handbooks Online. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayer, C. (1994). La familia romana. Aspetti giuridici e antiquari. Parte prima. Roma: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. (1984). La Grecia Antigua. Economía y sociedad. Trad. de T. Sempere. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Fossatti, M. B. (1983). Vendita ed esposizione dei neonati da Costantino a Iustiniano. SDHI, 49, 179–224.Google Scholar
Haentjens, M. E. (2000). Reflections on Female Infanticide in the Greco-Roman World. L’antiquité Classique, 69, 261–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hands, A. R. (1968). Charities and Social Aid in Greece and Rome. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. R. W. (1968). The Law of Athens. The Family and Propert. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humbert, G. (1962). s.v. Expositio. En Ch. Victor Daremberg & E. Saglio (Eds). Dictionnaire des Antiquités Grecques et Romaines de Daremberg et Saglio (pp. 930–939). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Israelowich, I. (2017). The extent of the patria potestas during the High Empire: Roman midwives and the decision of non tollere as a case in point. Museum Helveticum, 74, pp. 213–229.Google Scholar
Lamberti, F. (2014). La familia romana e i suoi volti. Pagine scelte su diritto e persone in Roma antica. Torino: Giapichelli Editore.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, F. (1964). Ricerche sulle azioni di stato nella filiazione in diritto romano. II, La c. d. presunzione di paternità. Bologna: N. Zanichelli.Google Scholar
López Eire, A. (1980). El niño en la antigüedad clásica. Studia Pedagogica. Revista de Ciencias de la Educación, 6, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
López Martínez, M. P. (1998). Fragmentos papiráceos de novela griega. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante. Servicio de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Maffi, A. (1992). Adopzione e strategie successorie a Gortina e ad Atene. En M. Gagarin (Ed.). Symposion 1990. Vortrage zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte. Pacific Grove, California, 24.-26. September 1990 (pp. 205–223). Kolh: Bohlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Martín, J. C. (2007). PLINIO, Epistolario (Libros I-X), trad. de José Carlos Martín. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Monnickendam, Y. (2019). The Exposed Child: Transplanting Roman Law into Late Antique Jewish and Christian Legal Discourse. American Journal of Legal History, 59, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mordachai Rabello, A. (1979). Effetti personali della “patria potestas” I. Dalle origini al periodo degli antonini, Milano: Giuffrè Editore.Google Scholar
Muñoz García, Á. y Andrade, G. (2006). La familia, célula de la democracia antigua y moderna: De Aristóteles a Tocqueville. Revista de Filosofía 54, 81–118.Google Scholar
Paoli, U. (1961). s.v. Famiglia. NNDI VII, 36–46. Torino: Unione tipografico editrice torineseGoogle Scholar
Peruzzi, E. (1970). Origini di Roma 1, Firenze: Valmartina Editore.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. (1997). Families in Classical and Hellenistic Greece. Representations and Realites, New York: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pugliese, G. (1982). Note sull’expositio in diritto romano. En Studi in onere C. Sanfilippo VI(432–445). Milano: Giurffrè Editore.Google Scholar
Ruíz Montero, C. (2006). La novela griega, Madrid.Google Scholar
Russi, A. (1986). I pastori e l’esposizione degli infanti nella tarda legislazione imperiale e nei documenti epigrafici. MEFRA. 98.2, 855–872. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hook, L. R. (1920). The Exposure of Infams at Athens. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 51, 134–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viljoen, G. van N. (1959). Plato and Aristotle on the Exposure of lnfants at Athens, Acta Classica 11, pp. 58–69.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1939). s v. Esposizioni dei nati. Diritto greco e diritto romano, NNDI, 878–879. Torino: Unione tipografico editrice torinese.Google Scholar
(1951). Un’osservazione in tema di tollere liberos, En Festschrift Fritz Schulz I (388–398). Weimar: Herm. Böhlaus Nachf.Google Scholar
(1980). Intorno alla formazione del Codice Teodosiano, BIDR, 83, 111–145.Google Scholar