Cover not available
Part of
The Reality of Women in the Universe of the Ancient Novel
Edited by María Paz López Martínez, Carlos Sánchez-Moreno Ellart and Ana Belén Zaera García
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 40] 2023
► pp. 159–172

Chapter 10
Narrative aspects of Callirhoe’s tomb

With an appendix on Seneca’s Troades, Act 3, and Jesus’ empty tomb

 | University of Crete
In Chariton’s Callirhoe the heroine’s tomb and burial receive attention unparalleled in ancient Greek novels. As the physical manifestations of apparent death, they point either to death or to (anticipated) “resurrection” or to both, with reference not only to Callirhoe but also to Chaereas. Of the two major reappearances of Callirhoe’s tomb, at Miletus and Syracuse, the former (real) reproduces and the latter (metaphorical) inverts the initial burial. There is a prominent association in the novel beween tomb and ship in terms of identification, reversal, and proximity, as well as an intriguing one between tomb and bedchamber. The narrative suggests that Callirhoe’s tomb encloses her bridal chamber, and later the heroine becomes aware that not only was she buried alive but carried Chaereas’ child in her womb and Chaereas’ image on her ring. This reality will later affect the lives of both Chaereas and the unborn child. The Appendix discusses Seneca’s Troades, Act 3, where Andromache hides her son Astyanax in Hector’s tomb, as a possibly contemporary parallel to Callirhoe’s tomb. It also rejects the widespread association of Jesus’ empty tomb and resurrection with Callirhoe’s empty tomb and “resurrection”.
Keywords: tomb, apparent death, resurrection, ship, bedchamber, womb, Andromache, Astyanax, Hector’s tomb, empty tomb, tumbōrukhia (“grave-robbing”), Nazareth Inscription
Article outline
  • Appendix
    • Seneca’s Troades, Act 3
    • Jesus’ empty tomb
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 1 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.40.10pas
References (24)
Bibliography
Bowie, E. (2002). “The Chronology of the Earlier Greek Novels since B.E. Perry: Revisions and Precisions”, Ancient Narrative 2: 47–63.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. (1996). “Plutarch’s Ariadne in Chariton’s Chaereas and Callirhoe”, AJP 117, 473–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Temmerman, K. (2002). “Institutional realia in Chariton’s Callirhoe. Historical and Contemporary Elements”, Humanitas 54: 165–187.Google Scholar
Doulamis, K. (2001). “Rhetoric and Irony in Chariton: a case study of Callirhoe”, Ancient Narrative 1: 55-72.Google Scholar
Dryden, J. (1668). Dramatick Poesie, An Essay. London: Henry Herringman, 24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (ed., transl.) (2002). Seneca: Hercules, Trojan Women, Phoenician Women, Medea, Phaedra. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fullmer, P. (2007). Resurrection in Mark’s Literary-Historical Perspective. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (ed., transl.) (1995). Chariton: Callirhoe. Cambridge, Mass. / London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, K., et al. (2020). “Establishing the provenance of the Nazareth Inscription. Using stable isotopes to resolve a historic controversy and trace ancient marble production” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 30 (2020). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2008). Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James D. (2010). “Art of Gold: Precious Metals and Chariton’s Callirhoe”, ASCS 31: 1–10.Google Scholar
Keulen, A. J. (ed., transl.) (2001). L. Annaeus Seneca: Troades. Leiden / Boston / Köln: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (1994). Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Ramelli, I. (2014). “The Novel and Christian Narrative”, in E. Cueva and S. N. Byrne (eds.), A Companion to the Ancient Novel, Wiley Blackwell, 180–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefteratou, A. (2017). Mythological Narratives: The Bold and Faithful Heroines of the Greek Novel. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morales, M. S. and Laguna Mariscal, G. (2003). “The Relationship between Achilles and Patroclus according to Chariton of Aphrodisias”, CQ 53: 292–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1990). “The Dating of Seneca’s Tragedies, with Special Reference to Thyestes”, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 6: 95–114.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. (2013). “The Basic Plot of Callirhoe: History, Myth, and Aristotelian Poetics”, in M. Paschalis and S. Panayotakis (eds.), The Construction of the Real and the Ideal in the Ancient Novel, Groningen: Barkhuis, (2013), 161–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearce, T. E. V. (1983). “The Tomb by the Sea: The History of a motif”, Latomus 42: 110–113.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2001). I romanzi antichi e il Cristianesimo: contesto e contatti. Graeco-Romanae Religionis Electa Collectio 6. Madrid: Signifer Libros.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (ed.) (2004). Chariton Aphrodisiensis: De Callirhoe narrationes amatoriae. Munich / Leipzig: Saur.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. (2007). Greek Identity and the Athenian Past in Chariton. The Romance of Empire. Ancient Narrative Supplementum 9, Groningen: Barkhuis & Groningen University Library, 54–61.Google Scholar
Tilg, S. (2010). Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. (2017). “Equal to God: Jesus’ Crucifixion as Scheintod”, in F. S. Tappenden and C. Daniel-Hughes (eds.), Coming Back to Life: The Permeability of Past and Present, Mortality and Immortality, Death and Life in the Ancient Mediterranean, Montreal: McGill University Library and Archives, 435–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar