Part of
The Reality of Women in the Universe of the Ancient NovelEdited by María Paz López Martínez, Carlos Sánchez-Moreno Ellart and Ana Belén Zaera García
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 40] 2023
► pp. 181–196
Edited by María Paz López Martínez, Carlos Sánchez-Moreno Ellart and Ana Belén Zaera García
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 40] 2023
► pp. 181–196
Chapter 12Chloe as learning subject in Longus’ Daphnis and
Chloe
Setting the erotic education of Daphnis and Chloe in the
context of contemporary discourses of paideia, this essay
argues that it is Chloe who represents the ideal learning subject. While
Daphnis is associated with the language of teaching and training
(διδάσκω,
παιδεύω), Chloe is associated with the language of
learning and understanding (μανθάνω). When her learning process is
depicted in the novel’s inset scenes of mythological story-telling, Chloe
repeatedly rejects or eludes hierarchical and transactional frameworks of
education, modeling a reflective self-awareness and intellectual agency that
separates her from Daphnis and connects her instead with adult figures like
the Hunter-Narrator and with the novel’s implied reader.
Article outline
- Teaching and training
- Chloe as learner
- Mimesis and the learning subject
- Conclusion
-
Notes -
Bibliography
References (19)
Bloomer, W. M. (2011). Quintilian
on the Child as a Learning
Subject. Classical
World 105, 109–137. 
Bowie, E. (2003). The
Function of Mythology in Longus’ Daphnis and
Chloe. In J. A. López Férez (Ed.), Mitos
en la literatura griega helenística e
imperial. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
(Ed.). (2019). Longus:
Daphnis and
Chloe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, S. (2002). The
Education of Daphnis: Goats, Gods, the Birds and the
Bees. Phoenix 56, 25–39.
Funke, M. (2012). Female
Sexuality in Longus and
Alciphron. In M. P. Futre Pinheiro, M. B. Skinner and F. I. Zeitlin (Eds.), Narrating
Desire (pp. 181–196). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Gilhuly, K. (2018). Erotic
Geographies in Ancient Greek Literature and
Culture. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Herrmann, F. -G. (2007). Longus’
Imitation: mimesis in the education of Daphnis and
Chloe. In J. R. Morgan and M. Jones (Eds.), Philosophical
presences in the Greek novel. Ancient
Narrative Supplement
10 (pp. 205–29). Groningen: The University of Groningen Press.
Hunter, R. L. (1983). A
Study of Daphnis and
Chloe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Konstan, D. (1994). Sexual
Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related
Genres. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lalanne, S. (2006). Une
éducation grecque. Rites de passage et constructions des genres dans
le roman grec
ancien. Paris: La Découverte.
(2014). Education
as Construction of Gender Roles in the Greek
Novels. In E. P. Cueva and S. N. Byrne (Eds.), A
Companion to the Ancient
Novel (pp. 473–89). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Lauwers, J. (2011). A
Pepaideumenoi’s Novel. Sophistry in Longus’ Daphnis and
Chloe. Ancient
Narrative 9, 53–75.
Maciver, C. A. (2020). Longus’
Narrator: A Reassessment. The
Classical
Quarterly, 70, 827–45.
Morgan, J. R. (1996). Erotika
Mathemata: Greek Romance as Sentimental
Education. In A. H. Sommerstein and C. Atherton (Eds.), Education
in Greek
Fiction (pp. 163–89). Bari: Levante.
(2004). Longus:
Daphnis and
Chloe. Oxford: Aris & Phillips.
Schlapbach, K. (2017). The
Anatomy of Dance Discourse: Literary and Philosophical Approaches to
Dance in the Later Graeco-Roman
World. Oxford: Oxford Unievrsity Press.
Wiersma, S. (1990). The
Ancient Greek novel and its heroines: a female
paradox. Mnemosyne 63, 109–23.
Winkler, J. J. (1990). The
Education of Chloe: Hidden Injuries of
Sex. In J. J. Winkler (Ed.), The
Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient
Greece (pp. 101–126). London: Routledge.
Xenophontos, S. (2015). Plutarch. In M. Bloomer (Ed.), A
Companion to Ancient
Education (pp. 335–46). New York: John Wiley and Sons.