Cover not available
Part of
Accesibilidad, traducción y nuevas tecnologías
Editado por Lucía Navarro-Brotons, Analía Cuadrado Rey y Iván Martínez-Blasco
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 41] 2024
► pp. 114–132

Plain Legal Language as accessibility tool for translators

An empirical study at a phraseological level

| Universidad de Córdoba
The accessibility of legal language has become an essential component of social integration for all citizens. Likewise, for any legal translator, understanding legal language will be a crucial first step in overcoming any communication barrier.
In light of this consideration, the purpose of this study is to compare the original Charter of the United Nations with the plain-language version adapted to the same language, paying particular attention to differences in phraseology. By conducting this study, we will have an opportunity to examine the linguistic simplification strategies applied by this international organization, taking into consideration the factors highlighted by plain language as a means of making legal language more communicatively accessible.
Keywords: accessibility, legal language, plain language, phraseology, legal translator
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Plain language: New legal communications
  • 3.Case study: The Charter of the United Nations
    • 3.1Aspects of the legal language’s phraseology
    • 3.2Plain-language adaptation of legal phraseology
    • 3.3Empirical results and its analysis
      • a.Reduction: Simplify the reader’s task by presenting less information
        • i.Omission
        • ii.Distillation
      • b.Amplification: Reader-friendly extension
        • i.Learning helps
        • ii.Glossing
      • c.Stratification: Simplifying the structure
        • i.Layering
        • ii.Drill down
      • d.Reframing
  • 4.Final considerations and conclusions
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.

Article language: Spanish

DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.41.05pol
References (18)
References
Adler, Mark. 2012. The Plain Language Movement. En The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. por Peter Meijes and Lawrence Solan, 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beccaria Marchese di, Cesare. 1819. An essay on crimes and punishments. Philip H. Nicklin.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1983. “Simplification v. Easification — The Case of Legal Texts1.” Applied linguistics 4(1): 42–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. 1921. “Institutio Principis Christiani, 1536. Chapters III–XI”. Translated, with an Introduction by Percy Ellwood Corbett. Oxford: MC Oxford.Google Scholar
Garner, Bryan A. 2001. Legal writing in plain English: A text with exercises. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hourani-Martín, Dunia. 2020. “Variación y transformaciones en unidades fraseológicas jurídicas: la importancia de su representación en herramientas para traductores.” Círculo de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación 82: 55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maaß, Christiane. 2020. Easy Language — Plain Language — Easy Language Plus: Balancing comprehensibility and acceptability. Berlin: Frank & Timme. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maher, Chrissie, Martin Cutts, y James T. Dayananda. 1986. “PLAIN ENGLISH in the United Kingdom.” English Today 2(1): 10–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles. 1748. De l’esprit des lois. Paris: Dalibon Libraire Palais Royal.Google Scholar
Navarro-Brotons, Lucía y Analía Cuadrado-Rey. 2022. “El nacimiento de un perfil profesional emergente en España: Traductor a lectura fácil intralingüística e interlingüístca”. En Translation, Mediation and Accessibility for Linguistic Minorities, ed. Por María Pilar Castillo Bernal y Marta Estévez Grossi, 191–204. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Rodney, Peter. 2001. “Plain English and the Law.” Legal Ethics 4(1): 18–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruusila, Anna, and Emilia Lindroos. 2016. “Conditio sine qua non: On Phraseology in Legal Language and its Translation”. Language and law/Linguagem e Direito 3(1): 120–140.Google Scholar
Sager, Juan Carlos. 1997. “Text Types and Translation.” En Text Typology and Translation ed. por AnnaTROSBORG, 25–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobota, Anna. 2014. “The plain language movement and modern legal drafting”. Comparative Legilinguistics 20: 19–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trklja, Aleksandar. 2017. “A corpus investigation of formulaicity and hybridity in legal language: a case of EU case law texts”. En Phraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings, ed. Por Gianluca Pontrandolfo y Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, 89–108. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1954. The Charter of the United Nations. [URL]
. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (n. d.). Plain English version of: Charter of the United Nations. 1945. [URL].
Waller, Rob. 2011. Simplification: what is gained and what is lost. Technical paper 1. Reading, UK: Simplification Centre, University of Reading.Google Scholar