Cover not available
Part of
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 21–59

Event structure and lexical semantics in a scalar approach to actionality

This paper offers a scalar analysis of Russian verbal forms derived with the prefix pro-. The proposed approach is crucially based on two notions integrated into the Generative Lexicon framework: Dynamic Event Structure, a representation of the internal makeup of events in terms of subevents or phases which allows tracking the change of the arguments’ properties over time; and change function, which accounts for the different ways in which these properties may be affected (i.e., initiated, terminated, modified or left unchanged) in the course of the event. Special emphasis is placed on the role of scalar properties of the nominal arguments in the composition of change-of-state predicates.

Keywords: change function, Dynamic Event Structure, Qualia Structure, Russian prefixation, scalarity
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.02bat
References
Andreevskaya, A
1997 “Pristavka i ee kontekst.” In Glagol’naja prefiksacija v russkom jazyke, Maksim Krongauz and Denis Paillard (eds.), 113–120. Moscow: Russkije slovari.Google Scholar
Batiukova, O
2008 Del léxico a la sintaxis: aspecto y qualia en la gramática del ruso y del español, Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2012 “Lexical aspect and multiple incremental themes.” In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally (eds.), 23–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Aspectual classes and scales of change.” Linguistics 51(4): 681–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco and Lentovskaya, Anna
2013 “Degree verbs. A contrastive Russian– English analysis.” Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 12: 1–27. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.Google Scholar
Braginsky, Pavel, and Rothstein, Susan
2008 “Vendlerian classes and the Russian aspectual system.” Journal of Slavic linguistics 1 (1): 3–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Civardi, Eugenio, and Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2015 “The semantics of degree verbs and the telicity issue”, Borealis: an International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 4(1): 57–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Miguel, Elena, and Fernández Lagunilla, Marina
2007 “Sobre la naturaleza léxica del aspecto composicional.” In Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General, Pablo Cano (coord.), vol. 2, 1767–1778. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1991 “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection.” Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana
2000 “The quantization puzzle.” In Events as grammatical objects, Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky (eds.), 39–96. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2008 “Events and maximalization. The case of telicity and perfectivity.” In Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 217–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flier, Michael
1975 “Remarks on Russian verbal prefixation.” Slavic and east European journal 19(2): 218–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher and Levin, Beth
1999 “Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in Degree Achievements.” In Proceedings of SALT IX, Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch (eds.), 127–144. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Alexandr
1962 [2003] Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim. Morfologija. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1996 “The Proper Treatment of Measuring Out, Telicity, and Perhaps Even Quantification in English.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(4): 305–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura and Lyashevskaya, Olga
2013 “Semantic Profiles of Five Russian Prefixes: po-, s-, za-, na-, -pro.” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21(2): 211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Olga
2012 “Degree Semantics for Russian Verbal Prefixes: The Case of pod- and do-.” In The Russian Verb. Oslo Studies in Language 4 (1), Atle Grønn and Anna Pazelskaya (eds.), 207–243. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
2013 “Scalarity in the domain of verbal prefixes.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(2): 483–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Scalarity in the Verbal Domain: the Case of Verbal Prefixation in Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Kennedy, Christopher
2012 “The Composition of Incremental Change.” In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally (eds.), 103–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher and Levin, Beth
2008 “Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements.” In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy (eds.), 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise
2005 “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates.” Language 81(2): 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1992 “Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution.” In Lexical Matters, Ivan Sag and Anna Szablocsi (eds.), 29–53. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Krongauz, Maksim
1998 Pristavki i glagoly v russkom jazyke: semantičeskaja grammatika. Moscow: Škola jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Kuznecov, Sergej
(ed.) 1998 [2009] Bol’šoj tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka. Saint Petersburg: Norint.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
2014 “Event encoding from a crosslinguistic perspective: the view from hitting events.” 16th Workshop on Linguistic Studies “Verb Classes and Aspect” , March 26–28, University of Alicante.
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2011 “Conceptual categories and linguistic categories.” LSA Linguistic Institute . University of Colorado.
Mani, Inderjeet and Pustejovsky, James
2012 Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslov, Jurij
1985 “An outline of contrastive aspectology.” In Contrastive Studies in Verbal Aspect, Jurij Maslov (ed.), 1–44. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher
2008 “Aspectual composition with degrees.” In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy (eds.), 183–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “How verbs of change target properties for change.” 10. Ereignissemantik-Workshop, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen.
Pustejovsky, James
1991 “The syntax of event structure.” Cognition 41(1): 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Events and the semantics of opposition.” In Events as grammatical objects, Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky (eds.), 445–482. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2013 “Dynamic Event Structure and Habitat Theory.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, Roser Saurí et al. (eds.), 1–10. Pisa: Istituto di Linguistica Computazionale.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James and Ježek, Elisabetta
To appear. “Verbal patterns of change.” Based on the talk presented at the Workshop “Scalarity in Verb-based Constructions.” Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, April 7–8, 2011.
Pustejovsky, James and Moszkowicz, Jessica
2011 “The qualitative spatial dynamics of motion in language.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 11(1): 15–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
1997 Aspect and predication: The semantics of argument structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes.” Nordlyd 32(2): 323–361.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth
2010 “Reflections on manner/result complementarity.” In Lexical semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav et al. (eds.), 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romanova, Eugenia
2006 Constructing perfectivity in Russian. PhD thesis. University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1991 The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Součková, Kateřina
2004 “Measure prefixes in Czech. Cumulative na- and delimitative po-”. MA thesis, University of Tromsø.
Stevens, Stanley S
1946 “On the theory of scales of measurement.” Science 103/2684: 677–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2008 “Intermediate prefixes in Russian.” In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16, Andrei Antonenko et al. (eds.), 423–445. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol
1994 Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hout, Angeliek
2000 “Projection Based on Event Structure.” In Lexical Specification and Insertion, Peter Coopmans et al. (eds.), 403–427. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yadroff, Michael and Fowler, George
1997 “Pristavka pro- i argumentnyj status imennyx grupp.” In Glagol’naja prefiksacija v russkom jazyke, Maksim Krongauz and Denis Paillard (eds.), 164–185. Moscow: Russkije slovari.Google Scholar