Cover not available
Part of
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 110–130

Causativity and psychological verbs in Spanish

This paper analyzes the transitive/intransitive alternation in class 2 psychological verbs of Belletti and Rizzi. The transitive variant implies an agentive subject and an aspectual change of state. The intransitive variant implies a cause and a locative state. Spanish class 2 psychological verbs are causative due to the cause component conflated in the verbal structure which gives rise to the verb: most of the psychological verbs with a transitive/intransitive alternation are denominal or deadjetival causative verbs from Romance origin. Some others come from a Latin denominal or deadjectival structure or from a causative meaning which comes as a result of an evolution in their meaning (usually agentive and local). Psychological verbs result from a conflation process by means of which the verb semantically incorporates the psychological element – as it results from a verbal lexicalization of the emotional or psychological noun or adjective, thus shaping a complex predicate. Psychological verbs are consequently complex predicates with a semantically incorporated psychological element.
Keywords: causativity, dative, psychological verb
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.06cif
References (36)
Arad, Maya. 1998. VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1997. “Thematic roles and syntactic structure.” In Elements of Grammar, L. Haegeman (ed.), 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becerra Bascuñán, S. 2007. Estudio diacrónico y sincrónico del objeto indirecto en el español peninsular y de América. Copenhague: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Andrea and Rizzi, Luigi. 1987. “Los verbos psicológicos y la teoría temática.” In Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas, Demonte, V. and Fernández Lagunilla, M. (eds.), 60–122. Madrid: El Arquero.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1995. The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campos, Héctor. 1999. “Transitividad e intransitividad.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (dirs.), 1519–1574. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachussets.Google Scholar
Cifuentes Honrubia, J.L. 2004. “Verbos locales estativos en español.” In Estudios de Lingüística: el verbo, J.L. Cifuentes Honrubia and C. Marimón Llorca (eds.), 73–118, Alicante: University of Alicante.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Spanish deadjectival verbs and argument structure.” In Spanish Word Formation and Lexical Creation, J.L. Cifuentes Honrubia and S. Rodríguez Rosique (eds.), 65–105. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corominas, J. and Pascual, J.A. 1987. Diccionario crítico-etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E. 1999. “El aspecto léxico.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (dirs.), 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Á. 2004. “Los verbos psicológicos y la estatividad: realizaciones del español.” Cuadernos de Lingüística del Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset 11: 23–43.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. 1959. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots. París: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A., Marín, R. and McNally, L. 2012. “From Psych Verbs to Nouns.” In Telicity and change of state in natural languages: implications for event structure, V. Demonte and L. McNally (eds.), 162–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glare, P.G.W. (ed.). 1980. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, S. 1999. “Los dativos.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (dirs.), 1855–1930. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.S. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kailuweit, R. 2007. “El enlace de los verbos de sentimiento. Un cálculo de rasgos.” In Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General, 2–1, (Las lenguas y su estructura (IIa)), P. Cano López (ed.), 1699–1708. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Landau, I. 2010. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lavale Ortiz, R. 2013. Verbos denominales causativos en español actual. Doctoral dissertation. University of Alicante.Google Scholar
Marín, R. 2001. El componente aspectual de la predicación. Doctoral dissertation. [URL]
. 2011. “Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos.” In Sobre estados y estatividad, Á. Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed.), 26–44. Munich: Lincolm.Google Scholar
Marín, R. and McNally, L. 2011. “Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 467–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, F. 2010. Prédicats statifs, causatifs et résultatifs en discours. Sémantique des adjectifs évaluatifs et des verbes psychologiques, [URL]Google Scholar
Parodi, C. and Luján, M. 2000. “Aspect in Spanish Verbs.” In Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium, H. Campos et al. (eds.), 210–221. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. 1994. “States, aspect and complex argument structures,” Proceedings of the Edinburgh Linguistic Department Conference ’94 , 183–193, Edimburgo.
Talmy, L. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics, II. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R.D. and LaPolla, R.J 1997. Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Voorst, J. 1992. “The aspectual semantics of psychological verbs.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 65–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhoe, H. 2002. Aspectos de la sintaxis de los verbos psicológicos en español. Un análisis léxico funcional. Doctoral dissertation. University of Gent. [URL] [URL]Google Scholar
Vogel, R. 1998. Polyvalent Verbs, Doctoral dissertation. Humboldt University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Wanner, A. 2001. “The optimal linking of arguments: the case of English psych-verbs.” In Competition in Syntax, Müller, G. and Sternefeld, W. (eds.), 377–399. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kailuweit, Rolf
2015. Romance object-experiencer verbs. In Verb Classes and Aspect [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 9], ► pp. 312 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.