Cover not available
Part of
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 238–263

On events that express properties

| Complutense University of Madrid
| Complutense University of Madrid
This paper provides empirical support to the hypothesis that habitual readings and dispositional/capacitative readings are different kinds of generic statements, generated by different operators: an aspectual operator HABASP is responsible for the habitual reading and a like modal dispositional operator MODDISP is responsible for the dispositional reading. We analyze the Spanish construction <ser muy de + infinitive>, ex. María es muy de fumar puros (lit. [María is very of smoking cigars]). This construction put together the meaning of a habitual sentence like María often smokes cigars, realized in the infinitive clause, and the meaning of an Individual Level predicate like María is a cigar smoker, realized in a predicative prepositional phrase muy de. Our analysis explains both the properties of the construction as an IL-predicate that contain an infinitive clause with habitual reading and the restrictions about the predicates that can enter the construction.
Keywords: dispositional, habitual, IL predicates, imperfective gnomics, infinitive, SL predicates
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.11fer
References (50)
Arche, María Jesús. 2006. Individuals in Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, M. and Barbara Partee. 1972. “Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English.” System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. Reprinted in Partee, B. Compositionality in Formal Semantics. 2004. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. “Statives, Progressives, Habituals.” Linguistics 32: 391–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Il dominio tempo aspettuale. Demarcazioni, intersezioni, contrasti. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco y Alessandro Lenci. 2012. “Habituality, Pluriactionality and imperfectivity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 852–880.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria. 2003. “Word order and incremental update.” Proceedings from CLS 39 (1): 634–64.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora.” In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, S. Rothstein (ed.), 349–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boneh, Nora and Edit Doron. 2008. “Habituality and the Habitual Aspect.” In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, S. Rothstein (ed.), 321–347. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Deux concepts d’habitualité.” Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 37: 113–138.Google Scholar
Brennan, Virginia. 1993. Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliary Verbs. Doctoral Dissertation, UMass.Google Scholar
Brinton, L.J. 1987. “The aspectual nature of states and habits.” Folia Lingüistica XXI (2-4): 195–214.Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2012. “Ser and estar: The Individual / Stage-Level distinction and aspectual predication.” In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea and E. O’Rourke (eds.), 453–477. Malden: Blakwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camus, Bruno. 2004. “Perífrasis verbales y expresión del aspecto en español.” In El pretérito imperfecto, L. García and B. Camus (eds.), 511–572. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory. 1995. “Truth conditions on generic sentences: Two constraining views.” In The generic book, G.N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), 224–237. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chiercha, Gennaro. 1995. “Individual level predicates as inherent generics.” In The generic book, G.N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), 224–237. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework.” In Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, et al. (eds.), 89–155. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1975. “On generics.” In Formal semantics of natural language, E.L. Keenan (ed.), 99–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1977. “Towards a Semantic Analysis of Verb Aspect and the English ‘Imperfective’ Progressive.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 45–77. [Reprinted in Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, P. Portner and B. Partee (eds.). 261–288. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht, Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. “A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals.” Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1 (2): 1–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fara, Michael. 2001. Dispositions and their adscriptions. Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University.
Fernández Leborans, Mª Jesús. 1999. “La predicación: las oraciones copulativas.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Sobre la oposición Individuo / Estadio’ en los predicados nominales.” In Ex admiratione et amicitia. Hom. al prof. Ramón Santiago, 377–394, Madrid: Ediciones del Orto.Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, Mª Jesús and Cristina Sánchez López. 2011. “La interpretación de mucho y cuantificadores afines.” In 60 problemas de gramática ofrecidos a Ignacio Bosque, V. Escandell, M. Leonetti and C. Sánchez (eds.), 77–82. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Sentences as predicates: The Spanish construction <ser muy de + infinitive>.” Communication to the Workshop Ser & estar at the interfaces, Alcalá de Henares, 25–27 October. In New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar, I. Pérez-Jiménez, M. Leonetti and S. Gumiel-Molina (eds.), 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
García Fernández, Luis. 2006. Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo. 1999. “Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), 3321–3390. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Jaque, Matías. 2014. La expresión de la estatividad en español: Niveles de representación y grados de dinamicidad, Ph. Philosophy dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelica. 1995. “Stage-level and Individual level predicates.” In The Generic Book, N.G. Carlson and J. Pelletier (eds.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Severing the External Argument from its Verb.” In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Building Statives.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 26.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffrey Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link and Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. “Genericity. An introduction.” In The generic book, G.N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), 1–24. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 1990. “Generic objects: Some more pieces to the puzzle.” Lingua 81: 25–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro. 1995. “The semantics representation of non-quantificational habituals.” In Temporal reference, aspect and Actionality, vol 2. Typological perspectives, P.M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higgimbotham and M. Squartini (eds.), 143–158. Turin: Rosemberg y Sellier.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. “Aspects, adverbs and events. Habituality vs. Perfectivity.” In Speaking of events, P. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higgimbotham, F. Pianesi and A.C. Varzi (eds,), 245–287. New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lekakou, Maria. 2005. In the Middle, Somewhat Elevated The semantics of middles and its crosslinguistic realization, doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Leonetti, Manuel. 1998. “A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Property Predication Restriction.” In Current Issues in relevance Theory, A. Jucker and V. Rouchota (eds.), 143–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, C. 2005. “On the limits of The Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences.” Theoretical Linguistics 31: 275–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “On Davidsonian and Kimian States.” In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, I. Comorovski and K. Von Heusinger (eds.), 107–130. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Martín, Rafael. 2013. La stativité dans tous ses états. Memoria de habilitación, Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
Menéndez Benito, Paula. 2013. “On dispositonal sentences.” In Genericity, A. Mary, C. Beyssade and F. Del Prette (eds.), 276–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1977. “Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English.” Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry and L.K. Schubert. 1989. “Mass Expressions.” In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), vol. 4, 391–394. Dordrech: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rimell, L. 2004. “Habitual sentences and generic quantification.” In Proceedings of the 23rd West Conference on Formal Linguistics, V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A.J. Rodríguez and B. Schmeiser (eds.), 663–676. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rothmayr, A. 2009. The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Magdalena. 2003. “Temporal anchoring of habitual.” In Proceedings of ConSole XI, M. van Koppen, J. Sio and M. de Vos (eds.). [URL].Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 2006. “Predication with characterizing sentences in Spanish.” In Andoin gogoan. Essays in honor of Professor Egukitza, B. Fernández and I. Laka (eds.), 835–853. Vitoria: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2024. Capturing meaningful generalizations at varying degrees of resolution. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Cano Cambronero, María de los Ángeles & Matías Jaque Hidalgo
2021. Codificación sintáctica del aspecto en la derivación deverbal: el caso de los adjetivos en –nte y los nombres en –ncia. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 48 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.