(Eds.)1993The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H.
(Eds.)2012The argumentative turn revisited. Durham: Duke University Press.
(ed.)2017The role of language in the climate change debate. New York: Routledge.
Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T.
2011Climate change discourse: Scientific claims in a policy setting. Fachsprache, 3–41, 205–219.
Gardiner, S. M.
2011A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2017Competing climate change narratives: An analysis of leader statements during COP21 in Paris. In K. Fløttum (ed.), The role of language in the climate change debate (pp. 31–48). New York: Routledge.
2004Politics of nature: How to bring sciences into democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2016Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues. Discourse & Communication, 10(6), 553–575.
2018Practical argumentation in the making: Discursive construction of reasons for action. In S. Oswald, T. Herman & J. Jacquin (Eds.), Argumentation and Language. Linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations (pp. 219–241). Cham: Springer.
Lewiński, M., & Mohammed, D.
2016Argumentation theory. In K. B. Jensen, R. Craig, J. Pooley & E. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (pp. 1–15). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2020. Beyond the co-production of technology and society: The discursive treatment of technology with regard to near-term and long-term environmental goals. Technology in Society 61 ► pp. 101244 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.