Article published In:
Argumentation and Meaning: Semantic and pragmatic reflexions
Edited by Steve Oswald, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli and Andrea Rocci
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1] 2020
► pp. 118
References (47)
References
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot. 1977. “Deux mais en français?”. Lingua 431: 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue. Sprimont: Editions Mardaga.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words (Vol. 1955). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 2014. Complete works of Aristotle, volume 1: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 1921). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bermejo Luque, L. 2011. Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M. 2003. Interpretation and understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doury, Marianne (ed). 2010. L’inscription langagière de l’argumentation. ( Special issue of Verbum 32(1)). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
. 2016. Argumentation: analyser textes et discours. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald, Danièle Bourcier, and Sylvie Bruxelles. 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 2010. A practical study of argument. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara. 2012. “Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation”. Discourse Studies 14(2): 197–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (Vol. 3), ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hastings, A. C. 1963. A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation (PhD Thesis). Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. 2019. “Language and argument: A review of the field”. Research in Language 17(1): 93–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosman, Lawrence A. 2002. Language and persuasion. In The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, ed. by James P. Dillard and Michael Pfau, 371–390. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant: Progressive values and the framing wars – A progressive guide to action. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lambda-L Group. 1975. “Car, parce que, puisque”. Revue Romane 10(2): 248–280.Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin, and Steve Oswald. 2013. “When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account”. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(B): 164–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2009. “Intuitive and reflective inferences”. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, ed. by Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, 149–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(2): 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Micheli, Raphaël. 2012. “Les visées de l’argumentation et leurs corrélats langagiers: une approche discursive”. Argumentation et analyse du discours 91. [URL]
Morency, Patrick, Steve Oswald, and Louis de Saussure. 2008. “Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 221: 197–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve. 2016a. “Commitment Attribution and the Reconstruction of Arguments”. In The Psychology of Argument. Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion, ed. by Fabio Paglieri, Laura Bonelli, and Silvia Felletti, 17–32. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
. 2016b. “Rhetoric and cognition: Pragmatic constraints on argument processing”. In Relevance Theory : Recent developments, current challenges and future directions, ed. by Manuel Padilla Cruz, 261–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Pragmatic inference and argumentative inference”. In Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 (Vol. 21), ed. by Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat, 615–629. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman, and Jérôme Jacquin. (eds). 2018a. Argumentation and Language. Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. “Introduction”. In Argumentation and Language. Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations, ed. by Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman, and Jérôme Jacquin, 1–21. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve and Marcin Lewiński. 2014. “Pragmatics, cognitive heuristics and the straw man fallacy”. In Rhétorique et cognition: Perspectives théoriques et stratégies persuasives – Rhetoric and Cognition: Theoretical Perspectives and Persuasive strategies, ed. by Thierry Herman and Steve Oswald, 313–343. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian. 2016. Dictionnaire de l’argumentation. Lyon: ENS éditions.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco. 2019. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, A. 2006. “Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication”. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(4): 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Modality in argumentation. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication and cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance”. Mind and Language 25(4): 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors We Think With : The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning”. PLOS ONE 6(2), e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tindale, Christopher. 1992. “Audiences, relevance, and cognitive environments”. Argumentation 6(2): 177–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., & Grootendorst, Rob. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: SUNY press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 1999. “Misunderstandings and explicit/implicit communication”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 9(4): 487–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Oswald, Steve
2023. The Pragmatics and Argumentation Interface. Languages 8:3  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew
2023. Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Ervas, Francesca, Maria Grazia Rossi, Amitash Ojha & Bipin Indurkhya
2021. The Double Framing Effect of Emotive Metaphors in Argumentation. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Schumann, Jennifer, Sandrine Zufferey & Steve Oswald
2021. The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives. Argumentation 35:3  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.