Article published In:
Argumentation and Meaning: Semantic and pragmatic reflexions
Edited by Steve Oswald, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli and Andrea Rocci
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1] 2020
► pp. 124147
References (52)
References
Allott, Nicholas, and Paula Rubio Fernandez. 2002. “This Paper Fills a Much-Needed Gap.” In Actes de l’Atelier des doctorants en linguistique, ed. by Peggy Afuta, Adil El Ghali, and François Toussenel, 97–102. Paris: Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borkenau, Peter, and Anette Liebler. 1992. “Trait Inferences: Sources of Validity at Zero Acquaintance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (4): 645–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, Robert F., and Catherine Craver-Lemley. 2004. “Mere Exposure Effect.” In Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory, ed. by Rüdiger F. Pohl, 215–234. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Boulat, Kira and Didier Maillat. 2017. "She Said You Said I Saw It with My Own Eyes: a pragmatic account of commitment. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrlemann-Tame, C. Laenzlinger (eds), Formal Models in the Study of Language. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 261-281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly. 1979. “Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (8): 1387–1397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dion, Karen, Elaine Walster, and Ellen Berscheid. 1972. “What Is Beautiful Is Good.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (3): 285–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Richard D. Ashmore, Mona G. Makhijani, and Laura C. Longo. 1991. “What Is Beautiful Is Good, but…: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype.” Psychological Bulletin 110 (1): 109–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Thomas A., and Mark E. Mattson. 1981. “From Words to Meaning: A Semantic Illusion.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 201: 540–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Angela M., and Judith H. Langlois. 2006. “Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or Is Ugly Bad?Social Cognition 24(2): 187–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, Alan E., and Christine Crofton. 1977. “What Is Good Is Beautiful.” Sociometry 40 (1): 85–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Renner C. 2004. “Validity Effect”. In Cognitive Illusions: a Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgment and Memory, ed. by Rüdiger F. Pohl, 201–213. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Hans. 2018. “Fallacies”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta, accessed on 31 March 2019. Retrieved from [URL]
Kaplan, Robert M. 1978. “Is Beauty Talent? Sex Interaction in the Attractiveness Halo Effect.” Sex Roles 4(2): 195–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleiman, Tali, Noa Sher, Andrey Elster, and Ruth Mayo. 2015. “Accessibility Is a Matter of Trust: Dispositional and Contextual Distrust Blocks Accessibility Effects.” Cognition 1421: 333–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan, and Dorothy Bishop. 2016. “Research Integrity: Don’t Let Transparency Damage Science.” Nature 5291: 459–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan, and Klaus Oberauer. 2013. “NASA Faked the Moon Landing – Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax”. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillat, Didier. 2013. “Constraining Context Selection: On the Pragmatic Inevitability of Manipulation.” Journal of Pragmatics 59(B): 190–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Les manipulations du discours de séduction: éclairage pragmatique.” E-rea, 15(1), accessed on 31 March 2019. Retrieved from: [URL]. DOI logo
Maillat, Didier, and Steve Oswald. 2009. “Defining Manipulative Discourse: The Pragmatics of Cognitive Illusions.” International Review of Pragmatics 1(2): 348–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Constraining Context: a Pragmatic Account of Cognitive Manipulation.” In Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 65–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2013. Biases and Constraints in Communication: Argumentation, Persuasion and Manipulation. (Special issue of the Journal of Pragmatics 59, Part B).Google Scholar
Mercier, Hugo and Dan Sperber. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira A., and Dan Sperber. 2004. Experimental Pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve and Didier Maillat (eds). 2018. Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017. Volume 11 and 21. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Pickrell, Jacqueline E., Daniel M. Bernstein, and Elizabeth F. Loftus. 2004. “Misinformation Effect.” In Cognitive Illusions: a Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgment and Memory, ed. by Rüdiger F. Pohl, 345–361. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pohl, Rüdiger F. (ed.). 2016. Cognitive Illusions: a Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgment and Memory. Second edition. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reder, Lynne M., and Gail W. Kusbit. 1991. “Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect Encoding, Retrieval, or Match?Journal of Memory and Language 291: 633–654.Google Scholar
Salkind, Neil. 2008. Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis, and Peter Schulz (eds). 2005. Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis. “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 113–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine. 2017. “Vers une théorisation du discours séducteur.” E-rea, 15.1, accessed on 31 March 2019. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Sperber, Dan. 2010. “The Guru Effect.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(4): 583–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1987. “Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition .” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 101: 697–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 251: 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Francesco Cara, and Vittorio Girotto. 1995. “Relevance Theory explains the Selection Task”. Cognition 571: 31–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thoresen, John C., Quoc C. Vuong, and Anthony P. Atkinson. 2012. “First Impressions: Gait Cues Drive Reliable Trait Judgements.” Cognition 124(3): 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Edward L. 1920. “A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings.” Journal of Applied Psychology 4(1): 25–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17(3): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser. 2008. “Rhetoric in a Dialectical Framework: Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 133–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: the Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1987. Informal fallacies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Media argumentation: dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Methods of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston. 2004. “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts”. In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Woods, John. 1995. “Appeal to Force”. In Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto, 240–250. Philadelphia, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar