Review published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:2 (2021) ► pp. 262272
Blair, J. Anthony
2010 “Logic in the Pragma-Dialectical theory.” In Frans H. van Eemeren et al. (Eds.), ISSA Proceedings 2010. (http://​rozenbergquarterly​.com​/issa​-proceedings​-2010​-logic​-in​-the​-pragma​-dialectical​-theory/; last seen November 28, 2018)
Dijk, Teun A. van and Kintsch, Walter
1983Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van
(ed.) 2002Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
2010Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2015Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2017Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1994Studies in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
2004A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and Tjark Kruiger
1978Argumentatietheorie. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007Argumentative indicators in discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels
2009Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline, Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
(Eds.) (2011) Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1970Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Houtlosser, Peter and Agnès van Rees
(Eds.) 2006Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip
2006How we reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, Georges
1972Einführung in die Normenlogik. Frankfurt/M.: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
1998 “Speech Act Sequences in Latin prose: Questions and Answers.” In: Charles M. Ternes and Dominique Longrée (éd.), Oratio soluta – oratio numerosa. Les mécanismes linguistiques de cohésion et de rupture dans la prose latine (pp. 65–86). Luxembourg: Centre Alexandre-Wiltheim.Google Scholar
2008 “Impoliteness and emotional arguments.” Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), 243–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Fiktive Argumente.” In Carl Friedrich Gethmann (ed.), Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft (pp. 505–538). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Whose Freedom? The Battle over America‘s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K.
1986On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. 21 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1983Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian
1998 “Les raisons des émotions.” In Marina Bondi (ed.), Forms of Argumentative Discourse (pp. 3–50). Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar
2005L’argumentation. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie
1993Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin. Amsterdam: Gieben. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson
1977Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Monika and Jeannette Chur
1996Semantik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in Society 51, 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Jacky
2016A dialogue game for critical discussion. Groundwork in the formalisation and computerisation of the pragma-dialectical model of argumentation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Woods, John
2004The death of argument. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woods, John and Douglas N. Walton
1989Fallacies. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N.
1982Topical relevance in argumentation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992The Place of emotion in argumentation. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
1997Appeal to Pity. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2000Scare Tactics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1976Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar