Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argue in support of a treatment advice to overcome a patient’s hesitance about it. In this argumentation, the doctor might explicitly present him- or herself as an authority, thereby presenting an argument by authority. Depending on the specific conditions under which the doctor advances such an argument, the doctor’s argument by authority can constitute a sound or a fallacious contribution to the discussion. In this paper, I shall determine what the specific soundness conditions are that apply to a doctor’s argumentation by authority in medical consultation.
2019. “Doctor, I disagree”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 336 ff.
Rivera, Francisco Javier Uribe & Elizabeth Artmann
2015. Argumentação e comunicação médico-paciente: comparando os enfoques da pragma-dialética de Toulmin e a sociolinguística americana. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 31:12 ► pp. 2577 ff.
Labrie, Nanon & Peter J. Schulz
2014. Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication. Health Communication 29:10 ► pp. 996 ff.
2013. Rational versus unreasonable persuasion in doctor–patient communication: A normative account. Patient Education and Counseling 92:3 ► pp. 296 ff.
Rubinelli, Sara
2013. Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 550 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.