Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 7:1 (2018) ► pp. 1–17

Establishing validity among pre-school children

| University Marburg
| University Halle-Wittenberg
This paper lays out theoretical considerations and first analyses on the giving of and asking for reasons among preschool children age 3–7 in natural child-child play interaction. We attempt to give an integrated, multimodal analysis of the verbal, paraverbal and extraverbal means of these reasoning activities. In our data we find many instances of younger children who are giving reasons during play interaction. Often these reasoning activities do not occur in an open conflict and are not primarily directed at working out a local dissensus. Rather, these interactions seem to foreground the epistemic function of argumentation. We will argue that these practices should be understood and researched as early forms of argumentation.
Keywords: argumentation, validity, child-child communication, cooperation, multimodality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Children arguing: between the management of dissensus and the establishment of validity
  • 3.“Embodied eloquence”, multimodality and protorhetoric
  • 4.Method and data
  • 5.Two exemplary analyses
    • 5.1What is a restaurant?
    • 5.2“Now it works supergood”
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 07 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.16019.han
References

References

Andresen, H.
2005 Vom Sprechen zum Schreiben. Sprachentwicklung zwischen dem vierten und siebten Lebensjahr. Klett-Cotta: Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Antos, G.
1985 Proto-Rhetorik. Zur Ontogenese rhetorischer Fähigkeiten. In: Dyck, J., Jens, W., Ueding, G. (Ed.): Rhetorik. Ein internationales Jahrbuch Bd. 4. De Gruyter: Tübingen, 7–28.Google Scholar
Arendt, B.
2015 Kindergartenkinder argumentieren. Peer-Gespräche als Erwerbskontext. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 62/ 1, 21–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bose, I.
2003 „doch da sin ja nur muster.“ Kindlicher Sprechausdruck im sozialen Rollenspiel. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Bose, I. and K. Hannken-Illjes
2012 Protorhetorik. In: Ueding, G. (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Bd. 101: Nachträge A-Z. De Gruyter: Berlin, S. 966–975.Google Scholar
2016 Wie Vorschulkinder Geltung etablieren. In: Studia Linguistica, 119–136.Google Scholar
Conley, T.
2000 What Counts as Topos in Contemporary Research. In: Schirren, T., Ueding, G. (Eds.): Topik und Rhetorik. Niemeyer: Tübingen, 579–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, A. and D. Kuhn
2014 Developing dialogic argumentation skills. A 3-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development 15/ 2, 363–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doury, M.
2012 Preaching to the converted. Why argue when everyone agrees? Argumentation 261, 99–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, G.
2011 Sonic Persuasion. Reading Sound in the Recorded Age. Illinois UP: Urbana.Google Scholar
Gunn, J.
2007 Gimme Some Tongue (On Recovering Speech). Quarterly Journal of Speech 93/ 3, 361–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hannken-Illjes, K.
2008 On Building a Winning Team. In: Hans Hansen, Christopher Tindale (Eds.), Proceedings of the OSSA-Conference on Argumentation. Windsor, Canada. (CD-ROM).
Jacquin, J.
2015 Multi-modal Counterargumentation in the Workplace: The Contribution of Gesture and Gaze to the Expression of Disagreement. GESPIN 4, 155–160.Google Scholar
Johnstone Jr., H.
1965 Some Reflections on Argumentation. In: Natanson, M., Johnstone Jr., H. (Hg): Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Argumentation. Pennsylvania State UP: University Park, 1–9.Google Scholar
Klein, W.
1980 Argumentation und Argument. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 10, 38/391, 9–57.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H.
2000 Topik und Soziologie. Von der sozialen zur kommunikativen Topik. In: Schirren, T. / Ueding, G. (Hg.): Topik und Rhetorik. Niemeyer: Tübingen, 651–668. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopperschmidt, J.
1989 Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. fromann-holzboog: Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Krummheuer, G.
1995 The ethnography of argumentation. In: Cobb, P., Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.): The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 229–269.Google Scholar
Kyratzis, A., T. Shuqum Ross and S. B. Koymen
2010 Validating justifications in preschool girls’ and boys’ friendship group talk implications for linguistic and socio-cognitive development. Journal of Child Language 37/ 1, 115–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.
1980 Zur Ontogenese moralischer Argumentationen. Zs. F. Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 10, 38/391: 58–108.Google Scholar
1987 Culture and collective argumentation. Argumentation 1, 21, 127–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muller-Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A. -N., Tartas, V. and Iannaconne, A.
2009 Psychosocial Processes in Argumentation. In: Muller-Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A. -N. (Hg.): Argumentation and Education. Theoretical Foundations and Practices. Springer: Berlin, 67–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A. -N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S. and Miserez-Caperos, C.
2015 Knowledge-Oriented Argumentation in Children. In: Garssen, B. J., Godden, D., Mitchell, G. and Snoeck Henkemans, F. (Hg.): Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. SicSat: Amsterdam, 1118–1126.
Pontecorvo, C. and F. Arcidiacono
2010 Development of Reasoning through Arguing in Young Children. Культурно-Историческая Психология/ Cultural-Historical Psychology 4, 19–29.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B., S. Michaels, and C. O’Connor
2010 How (Well-structured) Talk Builds the Mind. In: R. Sternberg and D. Preiss (Hg.), From Genres to Context: New Discoveries about Learning from Education Research and their Applications. Springer: New York, 163–194.Google Scholar
Schwarze, C.
2010 Formen und Funktionen von Topoi im Gespräch. Lang: Frankfurt/ M.Google Scholar
Schulz, V.
2014 Die Stimme in der antiken Rhetorik. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., Stukenbrock, A. and Uhmann, S.
2009 Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10, 353–402.Google Scholar
Stock, Eberhard
1996 Deutsche Intonation. Langenscheidt: München.Google Scholar
Valtin, R.
1991 Mit den Augen der Kinder: Freundschaft, Geheimnisse, Streiten, Lügen und Strafen. Rowohlt: Reinbek.Google Scholar
Völzing, P. -L.
1982 Kinder argumentieren. Die Ontogenese argumentativer Fähigkeiten. Schöningh: Paderborn.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Convertini, Josephine
2021. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Investigate Preschool children’s Implicit Inferential Reasoning in Scientific Activities. Research in Science Education 51:1 ► pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Hannken-Illjes, Kati
2019. »Siehe da, es gab Ermessensspielräume«. Argumentatives Erzählen – Erzählendes Argumentieren. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49:1 ► pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Iannaccone, Antonio, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont & Josephine Convertini
2019. Children as Investigators of Brunerian “Possible Worlds”. The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children’s Argumentative Thinking. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 53:4 ► pp. 679 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.