Cover not available
Review published In:
Argumentative Discourse in Contemporary China: A pragma-dialectical perspective
Edited by Peng Wu and Xu Cihua
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3] 2017
► pp. 386–392
Book review

Zhiwen Yang. 2013. Normative research on specific method of legal argumentation

Reviewed by
| Hubei University, China
Article outline
  • 1.General principles of legal argumentation
  • 2.Fundamental applied research on specific methods of legal argumentation
  • 3.Monographic studies of representative methods
  • 4.Specific evaluating methodology
  • 5.Final remarks
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17023.xu
References (6)
References
Aarnio, A. 1987. The rational as reasonable. A treatise on legal justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T. 1999. Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H.van and Grootendorst, R. 2003. A pragma-dialectical procedure for a critical discussion. Argumentation, 171: 365–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. Argumentation，communication，and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical approach. Hillsdale，NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P. 1967. Logische Propadeutik. Vorschule des vernunftigen Redens (2nd improved and enlarged edition). Mannheim: Biblioraphisches Institue.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. 2005. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. A theory of legal reasoning. NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar