Cover not available
Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:3 (2019) ► pp.383–391
Book review

Niilo Lahti (2017) The maneuvering Paul: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Paul’s argumentation in First Corinthians 4:18–7:40

Reviewed by
| SOL, Lund University
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Argumentation analysis of the New testament
  • Analysing a manoeuvring apostle
  • Paul as an arguer
  • Conclusions
  • Works cited
Published online: 24 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18002.hie
References (7)
Works cited
Eriksson, A. 1998. Traditions as Rhetorical Proof – Pauline Argumentation in 1 Corinthians. Coniectanea Biblica, NewTestament Series, 291. Diss. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Hietanen, M. 2007. Paul’s Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. Library of New Testament Studies, 344. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca 1971. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. University of Notre Dame Press, 1201; Notre Dame & London: University of Notre Dame Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegert, F. 1985. Argumentation bei Paulus. Gezeigt an Röm 9–11. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Thurén, L. 1995. Argument and Theology in 1 Peter – The Origins of Christian Paraenesis. Journal of the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series, 114. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
2014. Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in their Rhetorical Context. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S. 1990. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar