Cover not available
Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:3 (2019) ► pp.383–391
Book review

Niilo Lahti (2017) The maneuvering Paul: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Paul’s argumentation in First Corinthians 4:18–7:40

Reviewed by
| SOL, Lund University
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Argumentation analysis of the New testament
  • Analysing a manoeuvring apostle
  • Paul as an arguer
  • Conclusions
  • Works cited
Published online: 24 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18002.hie
References

Works cited

Eriksson, A.
1998 Traditions as Rhetorical Proof – Pauline Argumentation in 1 Corinthians. Coniectanea Biblica, NewTestament Series, 291. Diss. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Hietanen, M.
2007 Paul’s Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. Library of New Testament Studies, 344. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
1971 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. University of Notre Dame Press, 1201; Notre Dame & London: University of Notre Dame Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegert, F.
1985 Argumentation bei Paulus. Gezeigt an Röm 9–11. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Thurén, L.
1995 Argument and Theology in 1 Peter – The Origins of Christian Paraenesis. Journal of the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series, 114. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
2014 Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in their Rhetorical Context. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S.
1990 The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar