Article published in:Environmental Argumentation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1] 2019
► pp. 136–171
Deontic power and institutional contexts
The impact of institutional design on deliberation and decision-making in the UK fracking debate
In this article I study the constraints and opportunities available to decision-makers in an institutional context (a county council), by analyzing the deliberative process that led to the rejection of an application for exploratory fracking. Drawing on a corpus of 130,000 words, I intend to develop the theorization of argumentation in institutional contexts initiated in pragma-dialectics (van Eemeren, 2010) by drawing on philosopher John Searle’s (2010) concept of “deontic power”. Illustrating both the restrictive and enabling force of the institutional context, my analysis shows that, while decisions which are in keeping with institutional rules are legitimate in the sense of being legal, the reasonableness of the institutional context itself cannot be taken for granted. With various institutional rules in place seeming to obstruct rather than facilitate a rational decision outcome, and a local decision, democratically arrived at, subsequently legally overturned by central government, it can be argued that bias against local democracy was in this case built into (legal) institutional design.
Keywords: argumentative pattern, argument scheme, decision-making, deliberation, deontic powers, fracking, institutional context, institutional design, risks and impacts, shale gas
Published online: 14 February 2019
2014 AntConc (Version 3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
Bradshaw, Michael, and Catherine Waite
2015 “George Osborne urges ministers to fast-track fracking measures in leaked letter”. The Guardian 26 January 2015 At: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/26/george-osborne-ministers-fast-track-fracking
Drill Or Drop
n.d.). Website of independent journalism on fracking, onshore oil and gas and the reactions to it. At https://drillordrop.com
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Bart Garssen
van Eemeren, Frans H.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2015 “A dialectical profile for the evaluation of practical arguments”. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Rozenberg Quarterly. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat. Available from: http://rozenbergquarterly.com/issa-proceedings-2014-a-dialectical-profile-for-the-evaluation-of-practical-arguments/
forthcoming. “Is there such a thing as a conductive argument?” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Francis, Nelson and Henry Kucera
1964 The Brown Corpus, available from https://archive.org/details/BrownCorpus
2018 “Cuadrilla seeks to extend protest injunction at Lancashire fracking site – and applies for fracking consent”. Available from https://drillordrop.com/2018/05/21/cuadrilla-seeks-to-extend-protest-injunction-at-lancashire-fracking-site/ (last accessed 22 May 2018).
Lancashire County Council
2018 The Constitution, available on LCC website at http://council.lancashire.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=914&MId=2916&Ver=4&info=1&bcr=1
Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed
2016 “Costs Report to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government”. At https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/planning-inspectorate
Musi, Elena and Mark Aakhus
Rodrigues, S., Marcin Lewiński, and Mehmet Ali Uzelgun
Cited by 7 other publications
Fairclough, Isabela & Irina Diana Mădroane
Laar, Jan Albert van & Erik C. W. Krabbe
Lewiński, Marcin & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
Lewiński, Marcin & Dima Mohammed
Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.