Article published in:
Environmental Argumentation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1] 2019
► pp. 136171
References

References

Anthony, Lawrence
2014AntConc (Version 3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp/
Bradshaw, Michael, and Catherine Waite
2017 “Learning from Lancashire: Exploring the contours of the shale gas conflict in England”. Global Environmental Change 47: 28–36, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, Damian
2015 “George Osborne urges ministers to fast-track fracking measures in leaked letter”. The Guardian 26 January 2015 At: https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/environment​/2015​/jan​/26​/george​-osborne​-ministers​-fast​-track​-fracking
Cotton, Matthew
2017 “Fair fracking? Ethics and environmental justice in United Kingdom shale gas policy and planning”. Local Environment 22 (2): 198–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drill Or Drop
n.d.). Website of independent journalism on fracking, onshore oil and gas and the reactions to it. At https://​drillordrop​.com
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Bart Garssen
2012 “Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament”. In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 43–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics”. Argumentation 30: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017aThe dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context. Ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 157–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen
2010 “ In Varietate concordia – United in diversity. European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type”. Controversia 7(1): 19–37.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough
2012Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013 “Argument, deliberation, dialectic and the nature of the political: A CDA perspective”. Political Studies Review 11 (3): 336–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela
2015 “A dialectical profile for the evaluation of practical arguments”. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Rozenberg Quarterly. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat. Available from: http://​rozenbergquarterly​.com​/issa​-proceedings​-2014​-a​-dialectical​-profile​-for​-the​-evaluation​-of​-practical​-arguments/
2016 “Evaluating policy as practical argument: the public debate over the first UK Austerity Budget”. Critical Discourse Studies 13(1): 57–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018a “Deliberative discourse”. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Richardson, and John Flowerdew, 242–256. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018b “Conductive argumentation in the UK fracking debate”. In Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Vol. II, ed. by Steve Oswald, and Didier Maillat, 297–310. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
forthcoming. “Is there such a thing as a conductive argument?” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Francis, Nelson and Henry Kucera
1964The Brown Corpus, available from https://​archive​.org​/details​/BrownCorpus
Hayhurst, Ruth
2018 “Cuadrilla seeks to extend protest injunction at Lancashire fracking site – and applies for fracking consent”. Available from https://​drillordrop​.com​/2018​/05​/21​/cuadrilla​-seeks​-to​-extend​-protest​-injunction​-at​-lancashire​-fracking​-site/ (last accessed 22 May 2018).
Lewiński, Marcin
2016 “Shale gas debate in Europe: pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues”. Discourse and Communication 10(6): 553–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed
2019 “The 2015 Paris Climate Conference: Arguing for the fragile consensus in global multilateral diplomacy”. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp. XX–XX.Google Scholar
McKay, Wendy
2016 “Costs Report to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government”. At https://​www​.gov​.uk​/government​/organisations​/planning​-inspectorate
Miller, David
1994Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
2006Out of Error. Further Essays on Critical Rationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013Deduktivistische Entscheidungsfindung. In Kritischer Rationalismus heute. Zur Aktuaklität de Philosophie Karl Poppers, ed. by R. Neck, and H. Stelzer, 45–78. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. German translation of “Deductivist Decision Making” (unpublished MS).Google Scholar
Musi, Elena and Mark Aakhus
2019 “Framing fracking: Semantic frames as meta-argumentative indicators for knowledge-driven argument mining of controversies”. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp. xx–xx. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, S., Marcin Lewiński, and Mehmet Ali Uzelgun
2019 “Environmental manifestoes: Argumentative strategies in the Ecomodernist Manifesto”. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp. xxx–xxx. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
2005 “What is an institution?”. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitton, John, Kathryn Brasier, Ioan Charnley-Parry, and Matthew Cotton
2017 “Shale gas governance in the United Kingdom and the United States: Opportunities for public participation and the implications for social justice”. Energy Research and Social Science 26: 11–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Fairclough, Isabela
2020.  In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Fairclough, Isabela & Irina Diana Mădroane
2020. An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict. Co-herencia 17:32  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Goodwin, Jean
2019. Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1  pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
Laar, Jan Albert van & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2019. Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Lewiński, Marcin & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
2019. Environmental argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lewiński, Marcin & Dima Mohammed
2019. The 2015 Paris Climate Conference. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus
2019. Framing fracking. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1  pp. 112 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.