“Doctor, I disagree”
Development and preliminary validation of a patient argumentativeness scale
In medical consultations, disagreements may arise. Yet, patients’ predisposition to engage in a discussion with their doctors to resolve these disagreements may vary. This study aims to develop and validate a measurement tool to assess patient argumentativeness (P-ARG) in general practice. Starting from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation and Infante and Rancer’s (1982) argumentativeness scale, scale items were developed and subsequently administered to 183 participants. Principal component analysis was conducted to explore the scale structure. Also, convergent and concurrent validity were assessed. The results confirmed a two-factor scale structure and provided preliminary support for its validity. While further refinement is required, the (preliminary) P-ARG scale can be used for research purposes by medical argumentation as well as health communication scholars, e.g., to explore the relationships between doctors’ provision of argumentation, patients’ perspectives thereof, and patient argumentativeness.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Argumentation in general practice consultation
- 1.2Patient argumentativeness
- 1.3Rationale for a new measure
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Scale development
- 2.2Participants
- 2.3Additional measurements
- 3.Results
- 3.1Factor structure
- 3.2Scale validity
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- 4.1Discussion
- 4.2Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Akkermans, A., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Labrie, N., Henselmans, I., & van Laarhoven, H.
Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
2018 Special Issue of the Journal of Argumentation in Context, 7(2), ed. By
A. F. Snoeck Henkemans,
R. Pilgram, and
N. Labrie.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Avtgis, T., & Rancer, A. S.
(Eds.) 2010 Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research. Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bigi, S.
2010 “
Institutional constraints on the (un) sound use of the argument from expert opinion in the medical context”. In
Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by
F. H. van Eemeren,
B. Garssen,
D. Godden, and
G. Mitchell. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bigi, S.
2011 “
The persuasive role of ethos in doctor-patient interactions”.
Communication & Medicine, 8(1): 67.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charles, C., Gafni, A., and Whelan, T.
1997 “
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)”.
Social Science and Medicine, 44(5): 681–692.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charles, C., Gafni, A., and Whelan, T.
1999 “
Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model”.
Social Science and Medicine, 49(5): 651–661.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Degner, L. F., and Sloan, J. A.
1992 “
Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?”
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45(9): 941–950.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeWine, S., Nicotera, A. M., and Parry, D.
1991 “
Argumentativeness and aggressiveness: The flip side of gentle persuasion.”
Management Communication Quarterly, 4(3): 386–411.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowling, R. E., and Flint, L. J.
1990 “
The argumentativeness scale: Problems and promise”.
Communication Studies, 41(2), 183–198.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, F. H. van, and Grootendorst, R.
1984 Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion (Vol. 11). De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, F. H. van, and Grootendorst, R.
1992 Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, F. H. van, and Grootendorst, R.
2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach (Vol. 141). Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frosch, D. L., and Kaplan, R. M.
1999 “
Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions”.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 17(4): 285–294.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hample, D.
2018 Interpersonal arguing. Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Infante, D. A.
1982 “
The argumentative student in the speech communication classroom: An investigation and implications”.
Communication Education, 31(2): 141–148.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S.
1982 “
A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness”.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(1): 72–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S.
1996 Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research.
Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1): 319–352.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kazoleas, D.
1993 “
The impact of argumentativeness on resistance to persuasion”.
Human Communication Research, 20(1), 118–137.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labrie, N. H. M.
2012 “
Strategic maneuvering in treatment decision-making discussions: Two cases in point”.
Argumentation, 26(2): 171–199.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labrie, N. H. M., and Schulz, P. J.
2014a “
Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor–patient communication”.
Health communication, 29(10): 996–1008.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labrie, N. H. M., and Schulz, P. J.
2014b “
The effects of general practitioners’ use of argumentation to support their treatment advice: Results of an experimental study using video-vignettes”.
Health Communication, 30(10): 951–961.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labrie, N. H. M., and Schulz, P. J.
2014c “
Quantifying doctors’ argumentation in general practice consultation through content analysis: Measurement development and preliminary results”.
Argumentation, 29(1): 33–55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labrie, N. H. M., and Schulz, P. J.
2015 “
Exploring the relationships between participatory decision-making, visit duration, and general practitioners’ provision of argumentation to support their medical advice: Results from a content analysis”.
Patient Education and Counseling, 98(5): 572–577.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levine, T. R., & Kotowski, M. R.
2010 Measuring argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: Psychometric concerns and advances. In
T. Avtgis &
A. S. Rancer (Eds.),
Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research (pp. 67–81). Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A., Thisted, R. A.
2005 “
Not all patients want to participate in decision making”.
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(6): 531–535.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murray, E., Pollack, L., White, M., and Lo, B.
2007 “
Clinical decision-making: Patients’ preferences and experiences”.
Patient education and counseling, 65(2): 189–196.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onyekwere, E. O., Rubin, R. B., & Infante, D. A.
1991 “
Interpersonal perception and communication satisfaction as a function of argumentativeness and ego-involvement”.
Communication Quarterly, 39(1), 35–47.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pilgram, R.
2010 “
A doctor’s argumentation by authority as a strategic manoeuvre”. In
Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by
F. H. van Eemeren,
B. Garssen,
D. Godden, and
G. Mitchell. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pilgram, R. and Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
Rancer, A. S., and Avtgis, T. A.
2006 Argumentative and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application. Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rubinelli, S.
2013 “
Argumentation as rational persuasion in doctor-patient communication”.
Philosophy & Rhetoric, 46(4): 550–569.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salmon, P.
2015 “
Argumentation and persuasion in patient-centred communication”.
Patient Education and Counseling, 98(5): 543–544.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandman, L., and Munthe, C.
2010 “
Shared decision-making, paternalism and patient choice”.
Health Care Analysis, 18(1): 60–84.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schultz, B.
1982 “
Argumentativeness: Its effect in group decision-making and its role in leadership perception”.
Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 368–375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Singh, J. A., Sloan, J. A., Atherton, P. J., Smith, T., Hack, T. F., Huschka, M. M., and Degner, L. F.
2010 “
Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.”
The American journal of managed care, 16(9): 688.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Labrie, N., and Pilgram, R.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., and Wagemans, J.
2012 “
The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision-making”. In
Between Scientists and Citizens. Proceedings of a Conference at Iowa State University, ed. by
J. Goodwin. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., and De Maeseneer, J.
2005 “
Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference?”
Patient education and counseling, 56(2): 139–146.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Yu (张宇), Zhang
2021.
Discursive strategies for addressing patients’ disalignment with diagnosis in online medical consultations in China.
Discourse & Communication 15:4
► pp. 476 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.