Commentary published In:
Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
Edited by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2] 2018
► pp. 228230
References
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
1984Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin / Dordrecht: De Gruyter / Floris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser
2006 “Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation.” Argumentation 201: 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labrie, Nanon
2012 “Strategic maneuvering in treatment decision-making discussions: Two cases in point.” Argumentation 261: 171–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilgram, Roosmaryn
2009 “Argumentation in doctor–patient interaction: Medical consultation as a pragma-dialectical communicative activity type.” Studies in Communication Sciences 91: 153–169.Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
2011 “Shared medical decision-making: Strategic maneuvering by doctors in the presentation of their treatment preferences to patients.” In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden, and Gordon Mitchell, 1811–1818. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Sic Sat.Google Scholar