Scientific arguments in policy-making
This paper focuses on the use of scientific insights for justifying decisions in policy-making. Because in policy-making the politician argues for a future course of action by pointing at its positive consequences, the burden of proof should concern not only the scientific arguments, but also the pragmatic arguments. We show how the political justificatory process takes place that combines the two argument types, and we propose criteria for assessing the quality of the justifications. Based on our theoretical findings, we provide a case-study analysis of the Paris Agreement on climate change in which we demonstrate how the politicians attempt to meet their burden of proof imposed by pragmatic and scientific argumentation.
Keywords: burden of proof, policy-making, pragmatic argumentation, scientific arguments
Published online: 25 September 2019
[ p. 211 ]References
Alexander, W. J. R. and F. Bailey
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2014 What we know. The reality, risks, and response to climate change. Available online at http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/
2014 “The role of scientific expertise in multilateral environmental agreements: influence and effectiveness.” In The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision-Makers or Irrelevant Actors?, ed. by M. Ambrus, K. Arts, E. Hey and H. Raulus, 105–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2015 Why Italian earthquake scientists were exonerated. Available online at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/02/why-italian-earthquake-scientists-were-exonerated.
Eemeren, F. van
Eemeren, F. van and R. Grootendorst
Hajer, M. A.
2005 “Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies: A criteria-based typology to assess and optimize environmental policy advice.” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, ed. by Maasen, S. and P. Weingart, 41–61. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hertin, J., A. Turnpenny, M. Jordan, D. Russel Nilsson and B. Nykvist[ p. 212 ]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
2011 Appendix B to the Principles Governing IPCC Work. Financial procedures for the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Available online at http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization_procedures.shtml
2013 Appendix A to the Principles Governing IPCC Work. Procedures for the preparation, review, acceptance, adoption, approval and publication of IPCC reports. Available online at http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization_procedures.shtml
2014 Climate Change 2014. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Summary for policymakers. Available online at http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
Maasen, S. and P. Weingart
Radaelli, C. M.
2014 “Reflections on the different roles of expertise in regulatory policy making.” In The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision-Makers or Irrelevant Actors?, ed. by M. Ambrus, K. Arts, E. Hey and H. Raulus, 63–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. and J. Wagemans
2012 “The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making.” In Between scientists & citizens. Proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, ed. by J. Goodwin, 345–354. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.
2001 “Getting research into policy”. Paper presented at the Global Development Network, Rio de Janeiro, December 2001. Available online at http://reut-institute.org/data/uploads/Articles%20and%20Reports%20from%20other%20organizations/20080225%20-Getting%20research%20into%20Policy.pdf
Turner, S.[ p. 213 ]
2016 Paris Agreement. Paris: United Nations Treaty Collection. Available online at https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-d&chapter=27&lang=_en&clang=_en
1992 United Nations Convention on Climate Change. Available online at https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
Walton, D. N.
Weiss, C. H.
2011 Scientists on trial for not warning about earthquake. Available online at https://www.pri.org/stories/2011-09-21/scientists-trial-not-warning-about-earthquake