Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:2 (2019) ► pp. 195213
References

[ p. 211 ]References

Alexander, W. J. R. and F. Bailey
2007 “Solar activity and climate change – a summary.” Energy & Environment 18(6): 801–804. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2014What we know. The reality, risks, and response to climate change. Available online at http://​whatweknow​.aaas​.org​/get​-the​-facts/
Andone, C.
2015 “Pragmatic argumentation in European practices of political accountability.” Argumentation 29(1): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, S.
2014 “The role of scientific expertise in multilateral environmental agreements: influence and effectiveness.” In The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision-Makers or Irrelevant Actors?, ed. by M. Ambrus, K. Arts, E. Hey and H. Raulus, 105–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, C.
2008The political function of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 471–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge. Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bovens, M.
2006Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal 13(4): 447–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bromell, D.
2017The Art and Craft of Policy Advising. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cartlidge, E.
Cummings, L.
2010Rethinking the BSE Crisis. A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. van
2016Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation 30(1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. van and R. Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fischlin, A.
2017 “Background and role of science.” In The Paris Agreement on climate change: analysis and commentary, ed. by D. Klein, M. P. Carazo, M. Doelle, J. Bulmer and A. Higham, 3–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A.
2001Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63(1): 85–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hajer, M. A.
2009Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, H.
2005 “Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies: A criteria-based typology to assess and optimize environmental policy advice.” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, ed. by Maasen, S. and P. Weingart, 41–61. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hertin, J., A. Turnpenny, M. Jordan, D. Russel Nilsson and B. Nykvist
2009 “Rationalizing the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilization of knowledge in the policy process.” Environment and Planning 41(5): 1185–1200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 212 ]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
2011Appendix B to the Principles Governing IPCC Work. Financial procedures for the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Available online at http://​www​.ipcc​.ch​/organization​/organization​_procedures​.shtml
2013Appendix A to the Principles Governing IPCC Work. Procedures for the preparation, review, acceptance, adoption, approval and publication of IPCC reports. Available online at http://​www​.ipcc​.ch​/organization​/organization​_procedures​.shtml
2014Climate Change 2014. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Summary for policymakers. Available online at http://​www​.ipcc​.ch​/report​/ar5​/wg2/
Klabbers, J.
2014 “The virtues of expertise.” In The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision-Makers or Irrelevant Actors?, ed. by M. Ambrus, K. Arts, E. Hey and H. Raulus, 82–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Litfin, K.
2000Environment, wealth, and authority: Global climate change and emerging modes of legitimation. International Studies Review 2(2): 119–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maasen, S. and P. Weingart
2005 “What’s new in scientific advice to politics?” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, ed. by Maasen, S. and P. Weingart, 1–20. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Majone, G.
1989Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Millstone, E.
2013 “Science and decision-making: Can we both distinguish and reconcile science and politics.” In Trade, Health and the Environment. The European Union Put to the Test, ed. by M. B. A. van Asselt, M. Everson and E. Vos, 47–73. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulgan, R.
2003Holding Power to Account. Accountability in Modern Democracies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, C. M.
1999 “The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise?Journal of European Public Policy 6(5): 757–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrefler, L.
2014 “Reflections on the different roles of expertise in regulatory policy making.” In The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision-Makers or Irrelevant Actors?, ed. by M. Ambrus, K. Arts, E. Hey and H. Raulus, 63–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. and J. Wagemans
2012 “The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making.” In Between scientists & citizens. Proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, ed. by J. Goodwin, 345–354. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.Google Scholar
Stone, D.
2001 “Getting research into policy”. Paper presented at the Global Development Network, Rio de Janeiro, December 2001. Available online at http://​reut​-institute​.org​/data​/uploads​/Articles%20and%20Reports%20from%20other%20organizations​/20080225%20​-Getting%20research%20into%20Policy​.pdf
Turner, S.
2005 “Expertise and political responsibility.” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, ed. by Maasen, S. and P. Weingart, 101–121. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
[ p. 213 ]
1992United Nations Convention on Climate Change. Available online at https://​unfccc​.int​/resource​/docs​/convkp​/conveng​.pdf
Walton, D. N.
1997Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. The Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. H.
1979 “The many meanings of research utilization.” Public Administration Review 39(5): 426–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.
2011Scientists on trial for not warning about earthquake. Available online at https://​www​.pri​.org​/stories​/2011​-09​-21​/scientists​-trial​-not​-warning​-about​-earthquake