Dialogue moves are a pragmatic instrument that captures the most important categories of “dialogical intentions.”
This paper adapts this tool to the conversational setting of chronic care communication, characterized by the general goal of
making reasoned decisions concerning patients’ conditions, shared by the latter. Seven mutually exclusive and comprehensive
categories were identified, whose reliability was tested on an Italian corpus of provider-patient encounters in diabetes care. The
application of this method was illustrated through explorative analyses identifying possible correlations between the dialogical
structure of medical interviews and one of the indicators of personalized decision-making, namely the specificity of the
recommendations given by the provider (“customization”). The statistical analyses show a significant correlation between the
exchange of personal information and very specific and customized recommendations for change. It suggests how the creation of
common ground, exceeding the boundaries of the paternalistic or patient-centered models, can lead to highly effective
communication.
2013What is common ground? In Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, volume 2, ed. Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 285–310. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Arora, Neeraj, and Colleen McHorney
2000Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?Medical Care 381: 335–341.
Artstein, Ron, and Massimo Poesio
2008Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 341: 555–596.
Artstein, Ron, and Massimo Poesio
2009Bias decreases in proportion to the number of annotators. In Proceedings of FG-MoL 2005: The 10th conference on Formal Grammar, ed. Gerhard Jaeger, Paola Monachesi, Gerald Penn, James Rogers, and Shuly Wintner, 1391:141–150. Edinburgh, UK: CSLI publications.
Asterhan, Christa, and Baruch Schwarz
2009Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science 331: 374–400.
Baca-Motes, Katie, Amber Brown, Ayelet Gneezy, Elizabeth A. Keenan, and Leif D. Nelson
2013Commitment and behavior change: Evidence from the field. Journal of Consumer Research 391: 1070–1084.
Bigi, Sarah
2014Healthy reasoning: The role of effective argumentation for enhancing elderly patients’ self-management abilities in chronic care. In Active ageing and healthy living: A human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life, ed. Giovanni Riva, Paolo Ajmone Marsan, and Claudio Grassi, 193–203. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Bigi, Sarah
2016Communicating (with) care: a linguistic approach to doctor-patient interactions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Bigi, Sarah, and Nanon Labrie
2016Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care. In Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, ed. Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed, 251–265. London, UK: College Publications.
Braddock, Clarence H., Kelly A. Edwards, Nicole M. Hasenberg, Tracy L. Laidley, and Wendy Levinson
1999Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMA 2821: 2313–2320.
Brennan, Patricia, and Indiana Strombom
1998Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMA 51: 257–62.
Cavicchio, Federica, and Massimo Poesio
2009Multimodal corpora annotation: Validation methods to assess coding scheme reliability. In Multimodal corpora, ed. Michael Kipp, Jean-Claude Martin, Patrizia Paggio, and Dirk Heylen, 109–121. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Charles, Cathy, Amiram Gafni, and Tim Whelan
1997Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes, at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 441: 681–692.
Chewning, Betty, Carma Bylund, Bupendra Shah, Neeraj Arora, Jennifer Gueguen, and Gregory Makoul
2012Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 861: 9–18.
Clayton, Margaret F., Seth Latimer, Todd W. Dunn, and Leonard Haas
2011Assessing patient-centered communication in a family practice setting: How do we measure it, and whose opinion matters?Patient Education and Counseling 841: 294–302.
2009Patient preference for and reports of provider behavior: Impact of symmetry on patient outcomes. Health Psychology, 28(6), 660–667.
Dascal, Marcelo
1992On the pragmatic structure of conversation. In (On) Searle on conversation, ed. Herman Parret and Jef Verschueren, 35–57. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
Dunin-Keplicz, Barbara, and Rineke Verbrugge
2001The role of dialogue in cooperative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, ed. Ernest Davis, John McCarthy, Leora Morgenstern, and Raymond Reiter, 89–104. New York, NY: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University.
Durand, Marie Anne, Odette Wegwarth, Jacky Boivin, and Glyn Elwyn
2012Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis. Health Expectations 151: 32–48.
2011In Context: Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation 251: 141–161.
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
2005Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005, ed. David Hitchcock and Daniel Farr, 75–84. Hamlilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
Elwyn, Glyn, Adrian Edwards, Paul Kinnersley, and Richard Grol
2000Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice 501: 892–899.
Elwyn, Glyn, Dominick Frosch, Richard Thomson, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Amy Lloyd, Paul Kinnersley, Emma Cording, et al.
2012Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 271: 1361–1367.
Elwyn, Glyn, and Talya Miron-Shatz
2010Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expectations 131: 139–147.
Emmons, Karen, and Stephen Rollnick
2001Motivational interviewing in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 201: 68–74.
Entwistle, Vikki A., Ian S. Watt, Ken Gilhooly, Carol Bugge, Neva Haites, and Anne E. Walker
2004Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: Insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Education and Counseling 551: 105–113.
Epstein, Ronald, and Robert Gramling
2012What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Medical Care Research and Review 701: 94–112.
Epstein, Ronald, and Richard Street
2011Shared mind: Communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Annals of Family Medicine 91: 454–461.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1964An analysis of the interaction of language, topic, and listener. American Anthropologist 661: 86–102.
Geis, Michael
1995Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia Jaszczolt
2012Speaker intentions and intentionality. In The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, ed. Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 87–112. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hayes, Andrew, and Klaus Krippendorff
2007Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures 11: 77–89.
Heisler, Michele, Reynard Bouknight, Rodney Hayward, Dylan Smith, and Eve Kerr
2002The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. Journal of General Internal Medicine 171: 243–252.
Heisler, Michele, Sandeep Vijan, Robert M. Anderson, Peter A. Ubel, Steven J. Bernstein, and Timothy P. Hofer
2003When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?Journal of General Internal Medicine 181: 893–902.
Hymes, Dell
1964Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 661: 1–34.
Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding politeness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kaldjian, Lauris
2017Concepts of health, ethics, and communication in shared decision making. Communication & Medicine 141: 83–95.
Kecskes, Istvan
2010Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2889–2897.
2012Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. In Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, ed. Keith Allan and Kasia Jaszczolt, 169–190. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Konstantinidou, Aikaterini, and Fabrizio Macagno
2013Understanding students’ reasoning: argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education. Science & Education 221: 1069–1087.
Krabbe, Erik
1999Profiles of dialogue. In JFAK: Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday, ed. Jelly Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke, and Yde Venema, 31:25–36. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
Krippendorff, Klaus
2004Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Labrie, Nanon, and Peter J. Schulz
2014Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor–patient communication. Health Communication 291: 996–1008.
Lamiani, Giulia, Sarah Bigi, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Antonio Coppola, and Elena Vegni
2017Applying a deliberation model to the analysis of consultations in haemophilia: Implications for doctor-patient communication. Patient Education and Counseling 1001: 690–695.
LaNoue, Marianna D., and Debra L. Roter
2018Exploring patient-centeredness: The relationship between self-reported empathy and patient-centered communication in medical trainees. Patient Education and Counseling 1011: 1143–1146.
Levinson, Stephen
1992Activity types and language. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen
2012Action formation and ascription. In The handbook of conversation analysis, ed. Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 101–130. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Locke, Edwin A., and Gary P. Latham
2002Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist 571: 705–717.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2008Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in Walton’s pragmatic theory. Informal Logic 281: 102–128.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2018Assessing relevance. Lingua 210–2111: 42–64.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi
2017Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Studies 191: 148–168.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi
2018Types of dialogue and pragmatic ambiguity. In Argumentation and language, ed. Steve Oswald, Jérôme Jacquin, and Thierry Herman, 191–218. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
2017Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotation and reporting. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
Makoul, G., P. Arntson, and T. Schofield
1995Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Social Science and Medicine 411: 1241–1254.
Mann, William
1988Dialogue games: Conventions of human interaction. Argumentation 21: 511–532.
Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth, Fabrizio Macagno, and Deanna Kuhn
2016Developing argumentation strategies in electronic dialogs: Is modeling effective?Discourse Processes 531: 280–297.
McBurney, Peter, and Simon Parsons
2009Dialogue games for agent argumentation. In Argumentation in artificial intelligence, ed. Guillermo Simari and Iyad Rahwan, 261–280. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Mey, Jacob
2001Pragmatics. An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Mey, Jacob
2016Why we need the pragmeme, or: Speech acting and its peripeties. In Pragmemes and theories of language use, ed. Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 133–140. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Politi, Mary C., and Richard Street
2011The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: Facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 171: 579–584.
Al Qassas, Malik, Daniela Fogli, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Giovanni Guida
2015Analysis of clinical discussions based on argumentation schemes. Procedia Computer Science 641: 282–289.
Rapanta, Chrysi, Merce Garcia-Mila, and Sandra Gilabert
2013What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research 831: 483–520.
Ratliff, Amanda, Marcia Angell, Richard Dow, Miriam Kupperman, Robert Nease, Roger Fisher, Elliott Fisher, et al.
1999What is a good decision?Effective Clinical Practice 21: 185–197.
Reed, Christopher, Douglas Walton, and Fabrizio Macagno
2007Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, and Law 221: 87–109.
Rimer, Barbara K., and Matthew W. Kreuter
2006Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication 561: 184–201.
Roter, Debra, and Susan Larson
2002The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling 461: 243–251.
2007Higher-order intentions and self-politeness in evaluations of (im)politeness: The relevance of compliment responses. Australian Journal of Linguistics 271: 107–145.
Sacchi, Lucia, Giordano Lanzola, Natalia Viani, and Silvana Quaglini
2015Personalization and patient involvement in decision support systems: current trends. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 241: 106–118.
Sanders, Robert
1987Cognitive foundations of calculated speech: Controlling understandings in conversation and persuasion. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Schank, Roger, Gregg Collins, Ernest Davis, Peter Johnson, Steve Lytinen, and Brian Reiser
1982What’s the point?Cognitive Science 61: 255–275.
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John
2002Consciousness and language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Seuren, Pieter
2009Language in cognition: Language from within. Vol. 11. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Smith, David, and Loyd Pettegrew
1986Mutual persuasion as a model for doctor-patient communication. Theoretical Medicine 71: 127–146.
Stevenson, Fiona, Christine Barry, Nicky Britten, Nick Barber, and Colin Bradley
2000Doctor-patient communication about drugs: The evidence for shared decision making. Social Science and Medicine 501: 829–840.
Stewart, Moira
1995Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. CMAJ 1521: 1423–1433.
Streeck, Jürgen
1980Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle. Discourse Processes 31: 133–153.
Street, Richard
2013How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: Modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Education and Counseling 921: 286–291.
Street, Richard, Glyn Elwyn, and Ronald Epstein
2012Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 121: 167–180.
Street, Richard, and Paul Haidet
2011How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients’ health beliefs. Journal of General Internal Medicine 261: 21–27.
Street, Richard, Gregory Makoul, Neeraj Arora, Ronald Epstein, Richard Street Jr, Gregory Makoul, Neeraj Arora, and Ronald Epstein
2009How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling 741: 295–301.
Taylor, Keith
2009Paternalism, participation and partnership-The evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Education and Counseling 741: 150–155.
Walton, Douglas
1989aDialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation 31: 169–184.
Walton, Douglas
1989bInformal logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, Douglas
1990What is reasoning? What is an argument?Journal of Philosophy 871: 399–419.
Walton, Douglas
1992Types of dialogue, dialectical shifts and fallacies. In Argumentation illuminated, ed. Frans Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Anthony Blair, and Charles Willard, 133–147. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Sic Sat.
Walton, Douglas
1998The New Dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, Douglas
1999Profiles of dialogue for evaluating arguments from ignorance. Argumentation 131: 53–71.
Walton, Douglas
2010Types of Dialogue and Burdens of Proof. In Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), ed. Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Guillermo Simari, 13–24. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe
1995Commitment in dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Walton, Douglas, Alice Toniolo, and Tim Norman
2014Missing phases of deliberation dialogue for real applications. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ed. Wiebe van der Hoek, Lin Padgham, Vincent Conitzer, and Michael Winikoff, 1–20. Richland: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Wolpert, Howard, and Barbara Anderson
2001Management of diabetes: Are doctors framing the benefits from the wrong perspective?BMJ: British Medical Journal 3231: 994–996.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Di Bratto, Martina, Antonio Origlia, Maria Di Maro & Sabrina Mennella
2024. Linguistics-based dialogue simulations to evaluate argumentative conversational recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Macagno, Fabrizio & Roberto Graci
2024. When cancellation becomes unreasonable. Intercultural Pragmatics 21:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
2024. Proceedings of the 2024 Australasian Computer Science Week, ► pp. 47 ff.
Rapanta, Chrysi & Fabrizio Macagno
2023. Authentic questions as prompts for productive and constructive sequences: A pragmatic approach to classroom dialogue and argumentation. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 11:3 ► pp. A65 ff.
Martins, Marina & Fabrizio Macagno
2022. An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts. Science Education 106:3 ► pp. 573 ff.
Rossi, Maria Grazia, Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi
2022. Dialogical functions of metaphors in medical interactions. Text & Talk 42:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi
2021. The Role of Evidence in Chronic Care Decision-Making. Topoi 40:2 ► pp. 343 ff.
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Rossi, Maria Grazia & Fabrizio Macagno
2021. The Communicative Functions of Metaphors Between Explanation and Persuasion. In Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 27], ► pp. 171 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2020. How can metaphors communicate arguments?. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2023. Practical (un)cancellability. Journal of Pragmatics 215 ► pp. 84 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2023. Questions as Dialogue Games. The Pragmatic Dimensions of “Authentic” Questions. Studies in Philosophy and Education 42:5 ► pp. 519 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.