Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:3 (2019) ► pp. 337368
References

References

Allan, Keith
2013What is common ground? In Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, volume 2, ed. Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 285–310. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Arora, Neeraj, and Colleen McHorney
2000Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Medical care 38: 335–341. Crossref link
Artstein, Ron, and Massimo Poesio
2008Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34: 555–596. Crossref link
2009Bias decreases in proportion to the number of annotators. In Proceedings of FG-MoL 2005: The 10th conference on Formal Grammar, ed. Gerhard Jaeger, Paola Monachesi, Gerald Penn, James Rogers, and Shuly Wintner, 139:141–150. Edinburgh, UK: CSLI publications.
Asterhan, Christa, and Baruch Schwarz
2009Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science 33: 374–400. Crossref link
Baca-Motes, Katie, Amber Brown, Ayelet Gneezy, Elizabeth A. Keenan, and Leif D. Nelson
2013Commitment and Behavior Change: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Consumer Research 39: 1070–1084. Crossref link
Bigi, Sarah
2014Healthy reasoning: The role of effective argumentation for enhancing elderly patients’ self-management abilities in chronic care. In Active ageing and healthy living: A human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life, ed. Giovanni Riva, Paolo Ajmone Marsan, and Claudio Grassi, 193–203. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
2016Communicating (with) care: a linguistic approach to doctor-patient interactions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Bigi, Sarah, and Nanon Labrie
2016Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care. In Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, ed. Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed, 251–265. London, UK: College Publications.
Braddock, Clarence H., Kelly A. Edwards, Nicole M. Hasenberg, Tracy L. Laidley, and Wendy Levinson
1999Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. Jama 282: 2313–2320. Crossref link
Brennan, Patricia, and Indiana Strombom
1998Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 5: 257–62. Crossref link
Cavicchio, Federica, and Massimo Poesio
2009Multimodal corpora annotation: Validation methods to assess coding scheme reliability. In Multimodal corpora, ed. Michael Kipp, Jean-Claude Martin, Patrizia Paggio, and Dirk Heylen, 109–121. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Crossref link
Charles, Cathy, Amiram Gafni, and Tim Whelan
1997Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes, at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 44: 681–692. Crossref link
Chewning, Betty, Carma Bylund, Bupendra Shah, Neeraj Arora, Jennifer Gueguen, and Gregory Makoul
2012Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 86: 9–18. Crossref link
Clayton, Margaret F., Seth Latimer, Todd W. Dunn, and Leonard Haas
2011Assessing patient-centered communication in a family practice setting: How do we measure it, and whose opinion matters? Patient Education and Counseling 84: 294–302. Crossref link
Cvengros, Jamie Ann
2008Patient Preferences and Perceptions of the Healthcare Encounter: The Impact of Congruence on Patient Satisfaction and Adherence. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.
Dascal, Marcelo
1992On the pragmatic structure of conversation. In (On) Searle on conversation, ed. Herman Parret and Jef Verschueren, 35–57. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. Crossref link
Dunin-Keplicz, Barbara, and Rineke Verbrugge
2001The role of Dialogue in Cooperative Problem solving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense reasoning, ed. Ernest Davis, John McCarthy, Leora Morgenstern, and Raymond Reiter, 89–104. New York, NY: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University.
Durand, Marie Anne, Odette Wegwarth, Jacky Boivin, and Glyn Elwyn
2012Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis. Health Expectations 15: 32–48. Crossref link
van Eemeren, Frans
2010Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma- dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref link
2011In Context: Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation 25: 141–161. Crossref link
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
2005Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005, ed. David Hitchcock and Daniel Farr, 75–84. Hamlilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
Elwyn, Glyn, Adrian Edwards, Paul Kinnersley, and Richard Grol
2000Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice 50: 892–899. Crossref link
Elwyn, Glyn, Dominick Frosch, Richard Thomson, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Amy Lloyd, Paul Kinnersley, Emma Cording, et al.
2012Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27: 1361–1367. Crossref link
Elwyn, Glyn, and Talya Miron-Shatz
2010Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expectations 13: 139–147. Crossref link
Emmons, Karen, and Stephen Rollnick
2001Motivational interviewing in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations. American journal of preventive medicine 20: 68–74. Crossref link
Entwistle, Vikki A., Ian S. Watt, Ken Gilhooly, Carol Bugge, Neva Haites, and Anne E. Walker
2004Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: Insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Education and Counseling 55: 105–113. Crossref link
Epstein, Ronald, and Robert Gramling
2012What Is Shared in Shared Decision Making? Complex Decisions When the Evidence Is Unclear. Medical Care Research and Review 70: 94–112. Crossref link
Epstein, Ronald, and Richard Street
2011Shared mind: Communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Annals of Family Medicine 9: 454–461. Crossref link
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1964An analysis of the interaction of language, topic, and listener. American Anthropologist 66: 86–102. Crossref link
Geis, Michael
1995Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Grice, Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia Jaszczolt
2012Speaker intentions and intentionality. In The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, ed. Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 87–112. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Hayes, Andrew, and Klaus Krippendorff
2007Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures 1: 77–89. Crossref link
Heisler, Michele, Reynard Bouknight, Rodney Hayward, Dylan Smith, and Eve Kerr
2002The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. Journal of General Internal Medicine 17: 243–252. Crossref link
Heisler, Michele, Sandeep Vijan, Robert M. Anderson, Peter A. Ubel, Steven J. Bernstein, and Timothy P. Hofer
2003When Do Patients and Their Physicians Agree on Diabetes Treatment Goals and Strategies, and What Difference Does It Make? Journal of General Internal Medicine 18: 893–902. Crossref link
Hymes, Dell
1964Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American anthropologist 66: 1–34. Crossref link
Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding politeness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Kaldjian, Lauris
2017Concepts of health, ethics, and communication in shared decision making. Communication & medicine 14: 83–95. Crossref link
Kecskes, Istvan
2010Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2889–2897. Crossref link
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang
2009Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition 17: 331–355. Crossref link
Kissine, Mikhail
2012Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. In Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, ed. Keith Allan and Kasia Jaszczolt, 169–190. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Konstantinidou, Aikaterini, and Fabrizio Macagno
2013Understanding students’ reasoning: argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education. Science & Education 22: 1069–1087. Crossref link
Krabbe, Erik
1999Profiles of dialogue. In JFAK: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, ed. Jelly Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke, and Yde Venema, 3:25–36. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
Krippendorff, Klaus
2004Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Labrie, Nanon, and Peter J. Schulz
2014Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor–patient communication. Health Communication 29: 996–1008. Crossref link
Lamiani, Giulia, Sarah Bigi, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Antonio Coppola, and Elena Vegni
2017Applying a deliberation model to the analysis of consultations in haemophilia: Implications for doctor-patient communication. Patient education and counseling 100: 690–695. Crossref link
LaNoue, Marianna D., and Debra L. Roter
2018Exploring patient-centeredness: The relationship between self-reported empathy and patient-centered communication in medical trainees. Patient education and counseling 101: 1143–1146. Crossref link
Levinson, Stephen
1992Activity types and language. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2012Action formation and ascription. In The handbook of conversation analysis, ed. Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 101–130. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Crossref link
Locke, Edwin A., and Gary P. Latham
2002Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. The American psychologist 57: 705–717. Crossref link
Macagno, Fabrizio
2008Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in Walton’s pragmatic theory. Informal Logic 28: 102–128. Crossref link
2018Assessing relevance. Lingua 210–211: 42–64. Crossref link
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi
2017Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Studies 19: 148–168. Crossref link
2018Types of dialogue and pragmatic ambiguity. In Argumentation and Language, ed. Steve Oswald, Jérôme Jacquin, and Thierry Herman, 191–218. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
2017Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotation and reporting. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer. Crossref link
Makoul, G., P. Arntson, and T. Schofield
1995Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Social Science and Medicine 41: 1241–1254. Crossref link
Mann, William
1988Dialogue games: Conventions of human interaction. Argumentation 2: 511–532. Crossref link
Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth, Fabrizio Macagno, and Deanna Kuhn
2016Developing argumentation strategies in electronic dialogs: Is modeling effective? Discourse Processes 53: 280–297. Crossref link
McBurney, Peter, and Simon Parsons
2009Dialogue games for agent argumentation. In Argumentation in artificial intelligence, ed. Guillermo Simari and Iyad Rahwan, 261–280. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Crossref link
Mey, Jacob
2001Pragmatics. An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2016Why we need the pragmeme, or: Speech acting and its peripeties. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. Keith Allan, ‎Alessandro Capone, and ‎Istvan Kecskes, 133–140. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Crossref link
Politi, Mary C., and Richard Street
2011The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: Facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17: 579–584. Crossref link
Al Qassas, Malik, Daniela Fogli, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Giovanni Guida
2015Analysis of clinical discussions based on argumentation schemes. Procedia Computer Science 64: 282–289. Crossref link
Rapanta, Chrysi, Merce Garcia-Mila, and Sandra Gilabert
2013What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research 83: 483–520. Crossref link
Ratliff, Amanda, Marcia Angell, Richard Dow, Miriam Kupperman, Robert Nease, Roger Fisher, Elliott Fisher, et al.
1999What is a good decision. Effective clinical practice 2: 185–197.
Reed, Christopher, Douglas Walton, and Fabrizio Macagno
2007Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, and Law 22: 87–109. Crossref link
Rimer, Barbara K., and Matthew W. Kreuter
2006Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication 56: 184–201. Crossref link
Roter, Debra, and Susan Larson
2002The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient education and counseling 46: 243–251. Crossref link
Rubinelli, Sara, and Claudia Zanini
2012Teaching argumentation theory to doctors: Why and what. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1: 66–80. Crossref link
Ruhi, Şükriye
2007Higher-order intentions and self-politeness in evaluations of (im)politeness: The relevance of compliment responses. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27: 107–145. Crossref link
Sacchi, Lucia, Giordano Lanzola, Natalia Viani, and Silvana Quaglini
2015Personalization and patient involvement in decision support systems: current trends. Yearbook of medical informatics 24: 106–118. Crossref link
Sanders, Robert
1987Cognitive foundations of calculated speech: Controlling understandings in conversation and persuasion. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Schank, Roger, Gregg Collins, Ernest Davis, Peter Johnson, Steve Lytinen, and Brian Reiser
1982What’s the point? Cognitive Science 6: 255–275. Crossref link
Schulz, Peter J., and Bert Meuffels
2012 “It is about our body, our own body!”: On the difficulty of telling dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for them. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1: 130–142. Crossref link
Searle, John
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
2002Consciousness and Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Seuren, Pieter
2009Language in cognition: Language from within. Vol. 1. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Smith, David, and Loyd Pettegrew
1986Mutual persuasion as a model for doctor-patient communication. Theoretical medicine 7: 127–146. Crossref link
Stevenson, Fiona, Christine Barry, Nicky Britten, Nick Barber, and Colin Bradley
2000Doctor-patient communication about drugs: The evidence for shared decision making. Social Science and Medicine 50: 829–840. Crossref link
Stewart, Moira
1995Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. CMAJ 152: 1423–1433.
Streeck, Jürgen
1980Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle. Discourse Processes 3: 133–153. Crossref link
Street, Richard
2013How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: Modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Education and Counseling 92: 286–291. Crossref link
Street, Richard, Glyn Elwyn, and Ronald Epstein
2012Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 12: 167–180. Crossref link
Street, Richard, and Paul Haidet
2011How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients’ health beliefs. Journal of General Internal Medicine 26: 21–27. Crossref link
Street, Richard, Gregory Makoul, Neeraj Arora, Ronald Epstein, Richard Street Jr, Gregory Makoul, Neeraj Arora, and Ronald Epstein
2009How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient education and counseling 74: 295–301. Crossref link
Taylor, Keith
2009Paternalism, participation and partnership-The evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Education and Counseling 74: 150–155. Crossref link
Walton, Douglas
1989aDialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation 3: 169–184. Crossref link
1989bInformal logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
1990What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy 87: 399–419. Crossref link
1992Types of dialogue, dialectical shifts and fallacies. In Argumentation Illuminated, ed. Frans Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Anthony Blair, and Charles Willard, 133–147. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Sic Sat.
1998The New Dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. Crossref link
1999Profiles of dialogue for evaluating arguments from ignorance. Argumentation 13: 53–71. Crossref link
2010Types of Dialogue and Burdens of Proof. In Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), ed. Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Guillermo Simari, 13–24. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press. Crossref link
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe
1995Commitment in dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Walton, Douglas, Alice Toniolo, and Tim Norman
2014Missing phases of deliberation dialogue for real applications. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ed. Wiebe van der Hoek, Lin Padgham, Vincent Conitzer, and Michael Winikoff, 1–20. Richland: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Wolpert, Howard, and Barbara Anderson
2001Management of diabetes: are doctors framing the benefits from the wrong perspective? BMJ: British Medical Journal 323: 994–996. Crossref link