Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication
Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation
Dialogue moves are a pragmatic instrument that captures the most important categories of “dialogical intentions.” This paper adapts this tool to the conversational setting of chronic care communication, characterized by the general goal of making reasoned decisions concerning patients’ conditions, shared by the latter. Seven mutually exclusive and comprehensive categories were identified, whose reliability was tested on an Italian corpus of provider-patient encounters in diabetes care. The application of this method was illustrated through explorative analyses identifying possible correlations between the dialogical structure of medical interviews and one of the indicators of personalized decision-making, namely the specificity of the recommendations given by the provider (“customization”). The statistical analyses show a significant correlation between the exchange of personal information and very specific and customized recommendations for change. It suggests how the creation of common ground, exceeding the boundaries of the paternalistic or patient-centered models, can lead to highly effective communication.
Keywords: argumentation, chronic care, decision making, dialogue, dialogue moves, discourse analysis, health communication, pragmatics
Published online: 28 October 2020
Arora, Neeraj, and Colleen McHorney
Artstein, Ron, and Massimo Poesio
Asterhan, Christa, and Baruch Schwarz
Baca-Motes, Katie, Amber Brown, Ayelet Gneezy, Elizabeth A. Keenan, and Leif D. Nelson
2014 Healthy reasoning: The role of effective argumentation for enhancing elderly patients’ self-management abilities in chronic care. In Active ageing and healthy living: A human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life, ed. Giovanni Riva, Paolo Ajmone Marsan, and Claudio Grassi, 193–203. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Bigi, Sarah, and Nanon Labrie
2016 Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care. In Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, ed. Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed, 251–265. London, UK: College Publications.
Braddock, Clarence H., Kelly A. Edwards, Nicole M. Hasenberg, Tracy L. Laidley, and Wendy Levinson
Brennan, Patricia, and Indiana Strombom
Cavicchio, Federica, and Massimo Poesio
Charles, Cathy, Amiram Gafni, and Tim Whelan
Chewning, Betty, Carma Bylund, Bupendra Shah, Neeraj Arora, Jennifer Gueguen, and Gregory Makoul
Clayton, Margaret F., Seth Latimer, Todd W. Dunn, and Leonard Haas
Cvengros, Jamie, Christensen, Alan, Cunningham, Cassie, Hillis, Steven, & Kaboli, Peter
Dunin-Keplicz, Barbara, and Rineke Verbrugge
2001 The role of dialogue in cooperative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, ed. Ernest Davis, John McCarthy, Leora Morgenstern, and Raymond Reiter, 89–104. New York, NY: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University.
Durand, Marie Anne, Odette Wegwarth, Jacky Boivin, and Glyn Elwyn
van Eemeren, Frans
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
2005 Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005, ed. David Hitchcock and Daniel Farr, 75–84. Hamlilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
Elwyn, Glyn, Adrian Edwards, Paul Kinnersley, and Richard Grol
Elwyn, Glyn, Dominick Frosch, Richard Thomson, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Amy Lloyd, Paul Kinnersley, Emma Cording, et al.
Elwyn, Glyn, and Talya Miron-Shatz
Emmons, Karen, and Stephen Rollnick
Entwistle, Vikki A., Ian S. Watt, Ken Gilhooly, Carol Bugge, Neva Haites, and Anne E. Walker
Epstein, Ronald, and Robert Gramling
Epstein, Ronald, and Richard Street
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia Jaszczolt
Hayes, Andrew, and Klaus Krippendorff
Heisler, Michele, Reynard Bouknight, Rodney Hayward, Dylan Smith, and Eve Kerr
Heisler, Michele, Sandeep Vijan, Robert M. Anderson, Peter A. Ubel, Steven J. Bernstein, and Timothy P. Hofer
Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang
Konstantinidou, Aikaterini, and Fabrizio Macagno
Labrie, Nanon, and Peter J. Schulz
Lamiani, Giulia, Sarah Bigi, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Antonio Coppola, and Elena Vegni
LaNoue, Marianna D., and Debra L. Roter
Locke, Edwin A., and Gary P. Latham
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
Makoul, G., P. Arntson, and T. Schofield
Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth, Fabrizio Macagno, and Deanna Kuhn
McBurney, Peter, and Simon Parsons
Politi, Mary C., and Richard Street
Al Qassas, Malik, Daniela Fogli, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Giovanni Guida
Rapanta, Chrysi, Merce Garcia-Mila, and Sandra Gilabert
Ratliff, Amanda, Marcia Angell, Richard Dow, Miriam Kupperman, Robert Nease, Roger Fisher, Elliott Fisher, et al.
Reed, Christopher, Douglas Walton, and Fabrizio Macagno
Rimer, Barbara K., and Matthew W. Kreuter
Roter, Debra, and Susan Larson
Rubinelli, Sara, and Claudia Zanini
Sacchi, Lucia, Giordano Lanzola, Natalia Viani, and Silvana Quaglini
Schank, Roger, Gregg Collins, Ernest Davis, Peter Johnson, Steve Lytinen, and Brian Reiser
Schulz, Peter J., and Bert Meuffels
Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken
Smith, David, and Loyd Pettegrew
Stevenson, Fiona, Christine Barry, Nicky Britten, Nick Barber, and Colin Bradley
Street, Richard, Glyn Elwyn, and Ronald Epstein
Street, Richard, and Paul Haidet
Street, Richard, Gregory Makoul, Neeraj Arora, Ronald Epstein, Richard Street Jr, Gregory Makoul, Neeraj Arora, and Ronald Epstein
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe
Walton, Douglas, Alice Toniolo, and Tim Norman
2014 Missing phases of deliberation dialogue for real applications. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ed. Wiebe van der Hoek, Lin Padgham, Vincent Conitzer, and Michael Winikoff, 1–20. Richland: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Cited by 3 other publications
Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi
Macagno, Fabrizio & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto
Rossi, Maria Grazia & Fabrizio Macagno
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.