Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:3 (2019) ► pp.285–316

The TV addresses of the Swiss government before popular votes

A case study of argumentation in direct democracy

| Universität Wien
This paper analyzes an important genre in the public debates before popular votes in Switzerland: the TV addresses in which the Swiss government presents its standpoint and main arguments for or against the proposal put to the vote. The paper investigates a series of addresses in order to characterize the argumentation in them. The question is whether the addresses show similarities and, if there are any, what their pragmatic effects on the argumentation might be. The addresses are studied with concepts and methods from linguistics and argumentation theory: with regard to the role of the non-verbal modes, the composition, the relation between argumentation and other practices, the argumentative macro- and micro-structure, and personal references. In all these aspects, recurrent features can be identified. Many of these features can be understood as highly functional for the Swiss political system with its far-reaching direct democratic rights. They effectuate an argumentation that is rather informative than confrontational.
Keywords: direct democracy, genre, government communication, Switzerland, TV addresses
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background information on the Swiss political system
  • 3.Corpus and methods
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1The role of the non-verbal modes
    • 4.2The composition of parts, text elements, and verbal activities
    • 4.3The relation between argumentation and other practices
    • 4.4The argumentative macro-structure
    • 4.5The argumentative micro-structure
    • 4.6Personal references
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18049.sch
References (64)
References
Data
Federal Council. 2017a. [TV address on the] Bundesgesetz “Unternehmenssteuerreform III”, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2017b. [TV address on the] Energiegesetz, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2016. [TV address on the] Initiative “Für Ehe und Familie gegen die Heiratsstrafe”, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2015a. [TV address on the] Änderung des Bundesgesetzes über Radio und Fernsehen, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2015b. [TV address on] Präimplantationsdiagnostik, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2014a. [TV address on the] Beschaffung des Kampfflugzeuges Gripen, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2014b. [TV address on the] Initiative “Für den Schutz fairer Löhne”, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2014c. [TV address on the] Initiative “Gegen Masseneinwanderung”, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2014d. [TV address on the] Initiative “Pädophile sollen nicht mehr mit Kindern arbeiten dürfen”, produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 18 April 2018.
. 2013. [TV address on the] Bundesbeschluss über die Familienpolitik, produced by SRG SSR. Video provided by SRG SSR.Google Scholar
. 2010. [TV address] Zur Ausschaffungsinitiative und zum Gegenentwurf des Bundesrates, produced by SRG SSR. Video provided by SRG SSR.Google Scholar
Schröter, Juliane, and Stefan Keller. Forth. Transkripte von elf Video-Ansprachen der Schweizer Regierung vor Volksabstimmungen. Transcripts of eleven TV addresses given by the Swiss government before popular votes. Zenodo. DOI logo
Research literature
Amossy, Ruth. 2006. L’Argumentation dans le discours, second ed. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Andersson, Lynne M., and Christine M. Pearson. 1999. “Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace.” The academy of management review 24 (3): 452–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André. 2005. The real world of deliberation: A comparative study of its favorable conditions in legislatures. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis. 2010. “Interpersonal issues in political discourse.” In Interpersonal pragmatics, ed. Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 405–434. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinker, Klaus, Hermann Cölfen, and Steffen Pappert. 2014. Linguistische Textanalyse: Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden, eighth ed. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage, second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demarmels, Sascha. 2009. Ja. Nein. Schweiz: Schweizer Abstimmungsplakate im 20. Jahrhundert. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van. 2017. “The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context.” In Prototypical argumentative patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 157–180. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, et al. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Eggler, Marcel. 2006. Argumentationsanalyse textlinguistisch: Argumentative Figuren für und wider den Golfkrieg von 1991. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fandrych, Christian, and Maria Thurmair. 2011. Textsorten im Deutschen: Linguistische Analysen aus sprachdidaktischer Sicht. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Freitag, Markus. 2014. “Politische Kultur.” In Handbuch der Schweizer Politik: Manuel de la politique suisse, fifth ed., ed. Peter Knoepfel, Yannis Papadopoulos, Pascal Sciarini, et al., 71–94. Zürich: Neue Zürcher Zeitung.Google Scholar
García-Pastor, María Dolores. 2008. “Political campaign debates as zero-sum games: Impoliteness and power in candidates’ exchanges.” In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, ed. Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 101–123. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garssen, Bart. 2017. “The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European parliament.” In Prototypical argumentative patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 31–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haltmeier, Benjamin A. 2010. “Die Topik der Distanz: Regierungskommunikation im Kontext der Volksinitiative.” In Wahl der Wörter – Wahl der Waffen? Sprache und Politik in der Schweiz, ed. Kersten S. Roth and Christa Dürscheid, 147–164. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Hannken-Illjes, Kati. 2018. Argumentation: Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Hastings, Arthur C. 1962. A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. [Dissertation]. Evanston: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Jacquin, Jérôme, and Marta Zampa. 2016. “Do we still need an army like in the First World War? An argumentative analysis of a television debate on abolishing compulsory military service in Switzerland.” Discourse and communication 10 (5): 479–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2014. “What is mode?” In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, second ed., ed. Carey Jewitt, 60–75. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (ed.). 2011. Political communication in direct democratic campaigns: Enlightening or manipulating? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Direct democratic choice: The Swiss experience. Lanham: Lexington books.Google Scholar
Linke, Angelika, and Juliane Schröter. 2017. “Sprache in Beziehungen – Beziehungen in Sprache: Überlegungen zur Konstitution eines linguistischen Forschungsfeldes.” In Sprache und Beziehung, ed. Angelika Linke and Juliane Schröter, 1–31. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour.” In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, ed. Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin. 1999. Gewalt im Gespräch: Verbale Gewalt in politischen Fernsehdiskussionen am Beispiel der “Arena”. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Margreiter, Ralf. 2001. “Persuasion in den Abstimmungserläuterungen zur Alpen-Initiative: Das hohe Ross des Bundesrates?” LeGes 12 (1): 9–44.Google Scholar
Niehr, Thomas. 2004. Der Streit um Migration in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich: Eine vergleichende diskursgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Pedrini, Seraina. 2015. “Does culture matter for deliberation? Linguistic speech cultures and parliamentary deliberation in Switzerland.” Journal of public deliberation 11 (1): [article 8].Google Scholar
. 2014. “Deliberative capacity in the political and civic sphere.” Swiss political science review 20 (2): 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Ch.[aïm], and L. [ucie] Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1971. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components.” Argumentation 241: 489–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, Kersten S., and Christa Dürscheid (eds.). 2010. Wahl der Wörter – Wahl der Waffen? Sprache und Politik in der Schweiz. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Scholten, Heike, and Klaus Kamps (eds.). 2014. Abstimmungskampagnen: Politikvermittlung in der Referendumsdemokratie. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröter, Juliane. Forth. “Contradiction by default: On the discourses before popular votes in Switzerland.” In Contradiction studies, ed. Ingo H. Warnke, Susanne Schattenberg, Anna-Katharina Hornidge, et al. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
. 2016. “Vom Handeln zur Kultur: Das Konzept der Praktik in der Analyse von Verabschiedungen.” In Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken, ed. Arnulf Deppermann, Helmuth Feilke, and Angelika Linke, 369–403. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, et al. 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung 101: 353–402.Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut. 2016. “Multimodalität: Semiotische und textlinguistische Grundlagen.” In Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, ed. Nina-Maria Klug and Hartmut Stöckl, 3–35. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tresch, Anke, Lukas Lauener, and Laura Scaperrotta. 2018. VOTO-Studie zur eidgenössischen Volksabstimmung vom 4. März 2018. Lausanne/Aarau/Luzern: FORS/ZDA/LINK. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
Vatter, Adrian. 2016. Das politische System der Schweiz, second ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Other references
[Anonym.]. 2017. Federal constitution of the Swiss confederation of 18 April 1999 (Status as of 12 February 2017). [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2015. Federal act on political rights (PRA) of 17 December 1976 (Status as of 1 November 2015). [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
[Federal Chancellery] (ed.). 2018. [Explanation video on the] Vollgeld-Initiative: Abstimmung vom 10. Juni 2018. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
Federal Chancellery (ed.). 2018. Volksabstimmung vom 10. Juni 2018: Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2017. Volksabstimmung vom 24. September 2017: Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
Federal Council. 2018a. [Media conference on the “Vollgeld-Initiative”]. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2018b. [Radio address on the “Vollgeld-Initiative”], produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 5 June 2018.
Federal Statistical Office. 2018. Angenommene und verworfene Abstimmungsvorlagen, nach Typ. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
. 2016. Languages declared as main languages. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
Neue Volkspartei [ÖVP] and Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (eds.). 2017. Zusammen. Für unser Österreich: Regierungsprogramm 2017–2022. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
SRF (ed.). 2018. Abstimmungs-Arena SRF [on the “Vollgeld-Initiative”], produced by SRG SSR. [URL]. Accessed 26 November 2019.
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Dworakowski, Olenka, Tabea Meier, Matthias R. Mehl, James W. Pennebaker, Ryan L. Boyd & Andrea B. Horn
2024. Comparing the language style of heads of state in the US, UK, Germany and Switzerland during COVID-19. Scientific Reports 14:1 DOI logo
Schröter, Juliane
2021. Narratives Argumentieren in politischen Leserbriefen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 51:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Schröter, Juliane & Constanze Spieß
2021. Argumentieren und Erzählen in der politischen Kommunikation. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 51:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Smykała, Marta
2021. Argumentationsanalyse aus der Perspektive der Linguistik. Juliane Schröter (2021): Linguistische Argumentationsanalyse. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag WINTER, 100 S.. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :15 (2021) ► pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Schröter, Juliane & Sebastian Thome
2020. SVP – FPÖ. Argumentationen zweier rechtspopulistischer Parteien im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 50:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.