Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 9:2 (2020) ► pp.199218
Anthonissen, Christine
Berlin, Lawrence N.
2007 “Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and Appropriateness, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “ ‘I Think, Therefore…’: Commitment in Political Testimony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 372–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Redundancy and Markers of Belief in the Discourse of Political Hearings.” Language Sciences 331: 268–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Taryn
2009Justificatory Discourse of the Perpetrator in TRC Testimonies: A discourse-historical Analysis. M.A. thesis, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, Mary Bock, and Kay McCormick
2006 “Narrative Inequality in the TRC Hearings: On the Hearability of Hidden Transcripts.” Journal of Language and Politics 5 (1): 37–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Zanni
2007A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Ph.D. thesis, University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar
2008 “ ‘Language has a Heart’: Linguistic Markers of Evaluation in Selected TRC Testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses 3(3):189–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Code-switching: An Appraisal Resource in TRC Testimonies.” Functions of Language 18 (2): 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Zanni, Ngwanya Mazwi, Sifundo Metula, and Nosisi Mpolweni-Zantsi
2006 “An Analysis of What Has Been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 331:1–26.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Silva
2009 “Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The Case of Public Inquiries.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 22 (2): 209–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017 “The Role of Judges in Legal Proceedings: A Pragma-Dialectial Analysis.” In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng, 59–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garssen, Bart
2017 “Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics,” ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng, 145–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makinde, Bankole
2008 “Must we Kill El-Rufai now?Nigerian Tribune 18 April. Retrieved December 18, 2009 from [URL]
Marín-Arrese, I. Juana
2015 “Epistemic Legitimization and Inter/Subjectivity in the Discourse of Parliamentary and Public Inquiries.” Critical Discourse Studies 12(3): 261–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinig, Bob
1998 “Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them.” MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008 from [URL]
Murphy, James
2016 “Apologies Made at the Leveson Inquiry: Triggers and Responses.” Pragmatics and Society 7 (4): 595–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odebunmi, Akin, and Foluke Unuabonah
2014 “Defensive Acts in a Quasi-Judicial Hearing.” Ibadan Journal of English Studies 101:105–128.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2004 “There’s Risks in Everything: Extreme-Case Formulations and Accountability in Inquiry Testimony.” Discourse and Society 15(6): 745–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tovares, Allan V.
2016 “Going Off-Script and Reframing the Frame: The Dialogic Intertwining of the Centripetal and Centrifugal Voices in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Hearings.” Discourse and Society 27(5): 554–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unuabonah, Foluke
2012a “The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes 37(2): 1–23.Google Scholar
2012bInteraction Structure and Pragmatic Features in 2008 National Quasi- Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory Administration in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
2015 “The Generic Structure of a Public Hearing.” In Essays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, ed. by Akin Odebunmi and Joyce Mathangwane, 105–130. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2016 “Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-judicial Public Hearing.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 51(5): 619–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017a “But as a Stance Marker in Nigerian Investigative Public Hearings.” Pragmatics & Society 8 (3): 400–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Direct Quotations in Nigerian Investigative Public Hearings.” Text &Talk 38(4): 503–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press. “Appraisal Choices in Nigerian Investigative Public Hearings.” In Discourse, Pragmatics & Society: A Festschrift for Akin Odebunmi ed. by Adeniyi Osunbade, Foluke Unuabonah, Ayo Osisanwo, Akin Adetunji & Funke Oni New Castle upon Tyne Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Van Eemeren, Frans. H.
2017 “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse in Political Deliberation.” In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng, 123–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdoolaege, Annelies
2009 “The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC.” Discourse Studies 11(4): 441–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar