Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 9:2 (2020) ► pp. 283301
References

References

Angus, L. B.
1986Research traditions, ideology and critical ethnography. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 7:1, 61–77, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apple, M. W.
2006Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets, standards, God and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
2009Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge. In Argumentation and education (pp. 127–144). Springer, Boston, MA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biesta, G.
2004Educational research, evidence-based practice and professional judgement in education. Paper presented at the Faculty of Education of Stellenbosch University, Postgraduate Students Colloquium, 26 March 2004, 1–22.
Brickhouse, N. W., Stanley, W. B., & Whitson, J. A.
1993Practical reasoning and science education: Implications for theory and practice. Science & Education, 2(4), 363–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caterina, D.
2018Investigating hegemony struggles: Transdisciplinary considerations on the role of a critical discourse analysis of practical argumentation. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
1997Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? System, 25(3), 301–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, J. M.
2012Research on argumentation in science education in Europe. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective (pp. 253–289). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
2001Language and Power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
1989Language and Power London: LongmansGoogle Scholar
2010Critical Discourse Analysis, London: LongmansGoogle Scholar
2015Language and Power (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, I., and Fairclough, N.
2012Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA Perspective. Political Studies Review, 11 (3). pp. 336–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frederickson, M.
2004Surveying gender: Another look at the way we teach United States history. The History Teacher, 37(4), 476–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorur, R., Hamilton, M., Lundahl, C. and Sjödin, E. S.
2019Politics by other means? STS and research in education, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(1), 1–15, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., and Wajcman, J.
2008Introduction. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies, third edition (pp. 1–9). London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M.
2010Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: towards a Systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 7: 1, 55–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, L.
2014Ideology, rationality and reproduction in education: a critical discourse analysis, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 61–76, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. C., Lin, T. J., and Tsai, C. C.
2014Research Trends in Science Education from 2008 to 2012: a systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1346–1372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luke, A.
1995/96Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21(1), 3–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J.
2011The Discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for specific purposes, 30(3), 164–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A.
2001Critical applied linguistics: a critical introduction. London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapanta, C., & Macagno, F.
2016Argumentation methods in educational contexts: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 142–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramsden, P.
1992Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rangachari, P. K.
1994Quality education for undergraduates in pharmacology: a Canadian experiment. Trends in pharmacological sciences, 15(7), 211–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samaie, M., Sahragard, R. and Parhizkar, R.
2006. – A Critical Analysis of Learning and Teaching Goals in Gardner’s Theory of Attitudes and Motivation. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4),151–191.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M.
2004Research Genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P.
2000Towards Classifying the Arguments in Research Genres. In Trosborg (ed.). Analyzing professional genres. John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
2010Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uzuner-Smith, S. and Englander, K.
2015Exposing ideology within university policies: a critical discourse analysis of faculty hiring, promotion and remuneration practices, Journal of Education Policy, 30(1), 62–85, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
1998Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London. Sage.Google Scholar
2006Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
2004A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H.
2018Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. J., and Meuffels, B.
2015Effectiveness through reasonableness: A pragma-dialectical perspective. preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. In van Eemeren, H. (Ed). Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waghid, Y.
2006University education and deliberation: In defence of practical reasoning. Higher Education, 51(3), 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D.
2013Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R.
2001What CDA is About: A Summary of its History. Important Concepts and Its Developments. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, C. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London. Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A.
2004ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(4), 257–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar