In this essay, first the pragma-dialectical theory of strategic maneuvering is explained. Then the focus is on the conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types and the institutional constraints it imposes on strategic maneuvering. Thus, an adequate background is created for discussing, on the basis of several recent projects, pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain.
2022. Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation. Studia Humana 11:3-4 ► pp. 18 ff.
Larrain, Antonia, Gabriel Fortes & María Teresa Rojas
2021. Deliberative Teaching as an Emergent Field: The Challenge of Articulating Diverse Research Agendas to Promote Educational Experiences for Citizenship. Frontiers in Psychology 12
2020. Metaphors as strategic manoeuvring in isiXhosa traditional argumentative political discourse. South African Journal of African Languages 40:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2017. Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:3 ► pp. 234 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2014. Argumentation by Analogy in Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns. In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25], ► pp. 41 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.