Article published in:Argumentation in political deliberation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:1] 2013
► pp. 101–126
Designing disagreement space through communication-information services
A specific issue for argumentation theory is whether information and communication technologies (ICTs) play any role in governing argument — that is, as parties engage in practical activities across space and time via ICTs, does technology matter for the interplay of argumentative content and process in managing disagreement? The case made here is that technologies do matter because they are not merely conduits of communication but have a role in the pragmatics of communication and argumentation. In particular, ICTs should be recognized as communication-information services that are delegated degrees of responsibility for managing disagreements arising from practical activities. These services are organized around practical theories for designing disagreement space. However, recognizing this relationship between argument and technology requires accounting for procedures, techniques, or rules (i.e., such as found in technology) and speech acts that are not argumentative propositions in any strict sense but that are consequential for what becomes argumentation in any setting. An account about designing disagreement space, grounded in Jackson and Jacobs’s theory of Disagreement Management, is put forward to address these issues while more generally contributing to understanding argument in context.
Keywords: disagreement management, disagreement space, communication design work, third-parties, information-communication technologies, social media, deliberation, argument governance
Published online: 13 May 2013
Cited by 9 other publications
Aakhus, Mark & Marcin Lewiński
Aakhus, Mark, Pär J. Ågerfalk, Kanika Samra & Håkan Ozan
Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus
Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. & George F. (Guy) McHendry
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.