Designing disagreement space through communication-information services
Mark Aakhus | School of Communication & Information / Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
A specific issue for argumentation theory is whether information and communication technologies (ICTs) play any role in governing argument — that is, as parties engage in practical activities across space and time via ICTs, does technology matter for the interplay of argumentative content and process in managing disagreement? The case made here is that technologies do matter because they are not merely conduits of communication but have a role in the pragmatics of communication and argumentation. In particular, ICTs should be recognized as communication-information services that are delegated degrees of responsibility for managing disagreements arising from practical activities. These services are organized around practical theories for designing disagreement space. However, recognizing this relationship between argument and technology requires accounting for procedures, techniques, or rules (i.e., such as found in technology) and speech acts that are not argumentative propositions in any strict sense but that are consequential for what becomes argumentation in any setting. An account about designing disagreement space, grounded in Jackson and Jacobs’s theory of Disagreement Management, is put forward to address these issues while more generally contributing to understanding argument in context.
2019. Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What?. Topoi 38:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus
2018. Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining. Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 397 ff.
Aakhus, Mark
2017. The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities. Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Aakhus, Mark & Marcin Lewiński
2017. Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy. Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 179 ff.
Aakhus, Mark, Pär J. Ågerfalk, Kanika Samra & Håkan Ozan
2017. Engaging with Openness Through Common(s) Ground: Healthcare Innovation in the Networked Society. In Perspectives in Business Informatics Research [Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 295], ► pp. 199 ff.
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. & George F. (Guy) McHendry
2017. When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:4 ► pp. 287 ff.
Cramer, Peter
2016. Story Problems: Where Do the Agonists of the Dialogue Model of Argument Interact?. Argumentation 30:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Sprain, Leah
2015. Deliberative Democracy Discourse. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus
2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.