Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:3 (2021) ► pp.281314
References
Aakhus, M. and Marcin Lewiński
2017 “Advancing polylogical analysis of large-scale argumentation: Disagreement management in the fracking controversy.” Argumentation 31(1): 179–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andone, C.
2013Argumentation in political interviews. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a “The burden of proof in dealing with political accountability.” In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue, ed. by Săftoiu, R., M. Neagu, and S. Măda. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability.” Argumentation 291: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andone, C. and Alfonso Hernández
2019 “Scientific arguments in policy-making.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 8(2): 195–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M.
2006 “Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability. A Conceptual Framework.” European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-06-01.Google Scholar
2007 “Public accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, ed. by Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., & Pollitt, C. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, G. W.
2003President George Bush discusses Iraq in national press conference. The White House. President Gorge W. Bush. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from [URL]
Clayman, S.
2001 “Answers and evasions.” Language in Society 30(3): 403–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2002The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. and Matthew P. Fox
2017 “Hardballs and softballs. Modulating adversarialness in journalistic questioning.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(1): 19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, E.
1960 “The Presidential Press Conference: A Study in Institutionalization.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 4(4): 370–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1991 “Logic and conversation.” In Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harcup, T.
2014 “Press conferenceA dictionary of Journalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. and Peter Henshall
2008 “Press and media conferencesThe News Manual. A Professional Resource for Journalists and the Media. Volume 1: Basic Techniques. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from [URL]
Kumar, M. J.
2003 “’Does This Constitute a Press Conference’ Defining and Tabulating Modern Presidential Press Conferences.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33(1): 221–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leal, F.
2020 “On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion.” Argumentation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewiński, M. and Mark Aakhus
2014 “Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry.” Argumentation 28(2): 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, R.
2003Holding Power to Account. Accountability in Modern Democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raz, J.
1980The concept of a legal system. An introduction to the theory of legal system. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, A. and C. Raimondo
2018 “Dialogical Argumentation in Financial Conference Calls: the Request of Confirmation of Inference (ROCOI).” In Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. II1, 699–715) ed. by Oswald, S. & Maillat, D. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Searle, J.
1979Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. and D. Vanderveken
1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
1992Analysing Complex Argumentation. The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Amsterdam: Sicsat.Google Scholar
Stinga, L.
2008Political Accountability as a Radial Concept. EUI Working Papers SPS 2008/08.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. and R. Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordretch: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F., P. Houtlosser, and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans
2007Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.
2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017a “Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective.” In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns ed. by van Eemeren, F. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b “The dependency of argumentative patterns on institutional context.” In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns ed. by van Eemeren, F. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Peng
Zarefsky, D.
2014Political argumentation in the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar