Article published in:
Argumentative StyleEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1] 2021
► pp. 121–143
The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style
Henrike Jansen | Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
Maarten van Leeuwen | Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
This study responds to van Eemeren’s (2019, 2021) call for research on the prototypical argumentative styles used in particular domains or
communicative activity types by particular individuals or groups. It explores the argumentative style of Dutch politician Geert
Wilders in presenting populist arguments, i.e., arguments claiming that if many people hold a certain standpoint, this standpoint
should be accepted. A corpus study of 27 texts taken from the website of Wilders’s political party reveals four characteristics of
this presentation that deviate significantly from the general descriptions of this type of argument given in the textbooks: (1) absence of indicators, (2) implicit standpoint, (3) wide range of verbs to indicate what “the people” think or believe, (4) use of
a construction indicating that the speaker is acting as a mouthpiece (“on behalf of the people, I say”).
Keywords:
ad populum
, appeal to the majority, context of deliberation, political discourse, populism, populist argument, stylistic device
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The populist argument
- 3.Corpus and method
- 4.Non-argumentative populist references and regular symptomatic argumentation
- 5.Presentational characteristics of Wilders’s use of populist arguments
- 5.1Leaving out argumentative indicators
- 5.2Leaving standpoints implicit
- 5.3Using atypical verbs to introduce standpoints
- 5.4Using constructions without a verb in indicating the people’s opinion
- 6.A combination of presentational characteristics
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 04 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20020.jan
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20020.jan
References
Andone, C.
(2015) Engagement et non-engagement dans les appels à la majorité par des hommes politiques. Argumentation et analyse du discours, 151, 13 pp. Retrieved from: https://aad.revues.org/2021#tocto1n3
Blassnig, S., Büchel, F., Ernst, N., & Engesser, S.
Freeman, J. B.
Godden, D.
Herman, T. & Oswald, S.
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S.
Jansen, H.
Jansen, H., & van Leeuwen, M.
Jansen, H., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
Kienpointner, M.
Moffitt, B.
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R.
Nolt, J. E.
Oswald, S., and Hart, C.
Pauwels, T.
Reisigl, M.
Tonnard, Y.
van Eemeren, F. H.
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B.
(2015) The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1396–1407). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
van Haaften, T.
van Haaften, T., & van Leeuwen, M.
van Leeuwen, M.
van Leeuwen, M., & van Vliet, F.
Vossen, K.
Walton, D. N.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.