Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 11:2 (2022) ► pp.243–277

Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing

| University of Hradec Králové

This paper is focused on the practice of private diary-writing as an act of externalizing internal communication from the point of view of the theory of argumentation. It is demonstrated that through diary-writing, various forms of internal negotiation can be implemented. The paper sheds light on three ways internal negotiation is externalized through diary writing: reflective diary writing, crisis diary writing and self-encouraging diary writing. It is shown that these communicative practices occur with respect to specific exigencies of a diarist, and with respect to these specific exigencies, they differ in the type of argumentation that can be submitted in the writings. For the argumentative characterization of these practices, the concept of the communicative activity type introduced within a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation is used. It is shown that distinguished diary-writing practices are differently conventionalized activity types that are preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Keywords: argumentation, communicative activity type, diary-writing, reflective diary-writing, crisis diary-writing, self-encouraging diary-writing
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Pragma-dialectical approach applied to reconstruction of argumentative discourse
  • 2.Argumentation in internal communication
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Limits of data access
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data treatment
    • 3.4Illustrations
  • 4.Personal diary-writing as a blend of diverse internal communicative activity types
    • 4.1Procedural and material starting points of diary-writing
    • 4.2Outcome of the discussion in diary-writing
  • 5.Three modes of diary-writing argumentatively characterized
    • 5.1Reflective diary-writing
      • 5.1.1Initial situation
      • 5.1.2Argumentative means and criticism
    • 5.2Crisis diary-writing
      • 5.2.1Initial situation
      • 5.2.2Argumentative means and criticism
    • 5.3Self-encouraging diary-writing
      • 5.3.1Initial situation
      • 5.3.2Argumentative means and criticism
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Works cited
Published online: 6 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21014.sva
References

Works cited

Accardo, C. M., D. C. Aboyoun, B. A. Alford, and J. T. Cannon
1996 “Diaries: Who Keeps Them and Why.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 82 (2): 559–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alaszewski, Andy
2006 Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulou, Athena, Eugenia Rozou, and Mary Vakondiou
2020 “Voices of hope and despair: A narrative-dialogical inquiry into the diaries, letters, and suicide notes of Virginia Woolf.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 33 (4): 367–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Sue, and Kathy Murphy
1993 “Reflection: a review of the literature.” Journal of advanced nursing 18 (8): 1188–1192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aveling, Emma-Louise, Alex Gillespie, and Flora Cornish
2015 “A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness.” Qualitative Research 15 (6): 670–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
2006 [1935] The dialogic imagination: four essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baud, David
2001 “Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice.” New directions for adult and continuing education (901): 9–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumtrog, Michael D.
2018 “Reasoning and arguing, dialectically and dialogically, among individual and multiple participants.” Argumentation 32 (1): 77–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael
1996 Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Evelyne M., and Ann W. Fales
1983 “Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience.” Journal of humanistic psychology 23 (2) 99–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burt, Christopher D. B.
1994 “An analysis of a self-initiated coping behavior: Diary-keeping.” Child Study Journal 24 (3): 171–189.Google Scholar
Crowther, Barbara
1999 “Writing as performance: young girls’ diaries.” In Making meaning of narratives, ed. by Ruthellen Josselson and Amia Lieblich, 197–221. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culley, Margo
1985 A day at a time: the diary literature of American women from 1764 to the present. The Feminist Press at CUNY.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo
2005 “Debating with myself and debating with others.” In Controversies and subjectivity, ed. by Pierluigi Barrotta and Marcelo Dascal, 31–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijck, José
2004 “Composing the self: of diaries and lifelogs.” The Fibreculture Journal 31. Available at [URL]. Accessed 3 June 2021.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2010 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Identifying argumentative patterns: a vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 30 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans. H.
2017 “Strategic manouevring in argumentative discourse in political deliberation.” In Contextualizing pragma-dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng, 123–144. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1984 Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Strategic maneuvering: a synthetic recapitulation.” Argumentation 20 (4): 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2017 Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation (Second Edition). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007 Argumentative indicators: a pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014 Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, Raymond
1989 “Introduction.” In A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term, Bronisław Malinowski, xi–xix. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fothergill, Robert A.
1974 Private Chronicles: A Study of English Diaries. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1995 “One day at a time: the diary as lifewriting.” A/B: Auto/Biography Studies 10 (1): 81–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Miriam
2004 The text is myself: women’s life writing and catastrophe. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Geheran, Michael J.
2011 “I am fighting the hardest battle for my Germanness now”: internal dialogues of Victor Klemperer. Psychology & Society 4 (2): 21–39.Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara
2013 “Multivoiced decisions: a study of migrants’ inner dialogue and its connection to social argumentation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 21 (1): 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco, Sara
2017 “Using argumentative tools to understand inner dialogue.” Argumentation 31 (2): 331–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackfort, Dieter, and Peter Schwenkmezger
1993 “Anxiety.” In Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology, ed. by Robert N. Singer, Milledge Murphy and L. Keith Tennant, 328–364. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hardy, James
2006 “Speaking clearly: A critical review of the self-talk literature.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 7 (1): 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardy, James, Kimberley Gammage, and Craig Hall
2001 “A Descriptive Study of Athlete Self-Talk.” The Sport Psychologist 15 (3): 306–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Lew, Graham Jones, and Daniel Goud
1996 Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice. Chichester: Jones Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harrison, Kimberly
2003 “Rhetorical Rehearsals: The Construction of Ethos in Confederate Women’s Civil War Diaries.” Rhetoric Review 22 (3): 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J. M.
1996 “Voicing the self: from information processing to dialogical interchange.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (1): 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “The dialogical self: toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning.” Culture & Psychology 7 (3): 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “The dialogical self as a society of mind: introduction.” Theory & Psychology 12 (2): 247–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 16 (2): 89–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Society in the Self. A Theory of Identity in Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J. M., and Agnieszka Hermans-Konopka
2010 Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubbs, Delaura L., and Charles F. Brand
2005 “The paper mirror: Understanding reflective journaling.” Journal of Experiential Education, 28 (1): 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyers, Lauri L.
2018 Diary Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, Phillippe
2009 On diary, ed. by Jeremy D. Popkin and Julie Rak. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marty, Eric
1985 L’ecriture du jour. Le journal d’André Gide. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
McFerran, Shannon, and Daniel G. Scott
2013 The girls’ diary project: writing ourselves into being. Victoria: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Nir, Dina
2009 The negotiational self: identifying and transforming negotiation outcomes within the self, unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
2012 “Voicing inner conflict: From a dialogical to a negotiational self.” In Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory, ed. by Hubert J. M. Hermans and Thorsten Gieser, 284–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2016 “Becoming the Leader of Your Decisions.” In Assessing and Stimulating a Dialogical Self in Groups, Teams, Cultures, and Organizations, ed. by Hubert J. M. Hermans, 1–17. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Raalte, Judy L. and Andrew Vincent
2017 “Self-Talk and Performance.” Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Available at: [URL]. Accessed 3 June 2021. DOI logo
Rainer, Tristine
1980 The New Diary. How to Use a Journal for Self-Guidance and Expanded Creativity. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Rottenberg-Rosler, Biri, Shifra Schonmann, and Emanuel Berman
2009 “Dear Diary: Catharsis and Narratives of Aloneness in Adolescents’ Diaries.” Enquire 2 (1): 133–156.Google Scholar
Sederberg, Kathryn
2017 “Writing through crisis: time, history, futurity in German diaries of the second world war.” Biography 40 (2): 323–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinats, Petra, Daniel G. Scott, Shannon McFerran, Madelaine Hittos, Carys Cragg, Theresa Leblanc, and Daniela Brooks
2005a “Writing ourselves into being: writing as spiritual self-care for adolescent girls. Part one.” International Journal of Children’s Spirituality 10 (1): 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b “Writing ourselves into being: writing as spiritual self-care for adolescent girls. Part two.” International Journal of Children’s Spirituality 10 (3): 263–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinitz, Rebecca
1997 “Writing diaries, reading diaries: The mechanics of memory.” Communication Review 2 (1): 43–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svačinová, Iva
2021 “Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type.” Argumentation 35 (2): 237–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theodorakis, Yannis, Robert Weinberg, Petros Natsis, Irina Douma, and Panagiotis Kazakas
2000 “The Effects of Motivational Versus Instructional Self-Talk on Improving Motor Performance.” The Sport Psychologist 14 (3): 253–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev
1987 [1934] Thought and language, ed. Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke J., and Gijsbert Rutten
2013 “Ego-documents in a historical-sociolinguistic perspective.” In Touching the past: studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, ed. by Marijke J. van der Wal and Gijsbert Rutten, 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zammuner, Vanda L.
2001 “Diary kinds and functions, and adolescents’ motives for keeping a diary.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies (ISQOLS), ed. by Ferran Casas and Carme Saurina, 453–474. Girona: Universidad de Girona.Google Scholar
Zampa, Marta
2014 “Arguing with oneself in writing for the news.” In 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) conference. Available at [URL]. Accessed 3 June 2021.
Zampa, Marta, and Daniel Perrin
2016 “Arguing with oneself.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (1): 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zittoun, Tania
2007 “Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions.” Young 15 (2): 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Three dimensions of dialogical movement.” New Ideas in Psychology 321: 99–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zittoun, Tania, and Alex Gillespie
2012 “Using diaries and self-writings as data in psychological research.” In Emerging methods in psychology, ed. by Emily Abbey and Seth Surgan, 1–26. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar