Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 11:3 (2022) ► pp.394416
Aakhus, Mark
2007 “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 74 (1):112–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Deliberation Digitized: Designing Disagreement Space Through Communication-Information Services.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):101–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aakhus, Mark, and Marcin Lewiński
2011 “Argument Analysis in Large-Scale Deliberation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 165–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy.” Argumentation 31 (1):179–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asen, Robert
2005 “Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere.” Informal Logic 25 (2):117–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Brittney
2018Eloquent Rage: A Black Feminist Discovers Her Superpower. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Corredor, Cristina
2018 “Norms in Deliberation: The Role of the Principles of Justice and Universalization in Practical Discourses on the Justice of Norms.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (68):11–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Deliberative Speech Acts: An Interactional Approach.” Language and Communication 711:136–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cross, Tia, Freada Klein, Barbara Smith, and Beverly Smith
1982 “Face-to-Face, Day-to-Day – Racism CR.” In All the Women are White, all the Blacks are Men, but Some of Us are Brave, 2nd ed., ed. by Akasha (Gloria T.) Hull, Patricia Bell-Scott, and Barbara Smith, 52–6. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
de Veaux, Alexis
2004Warrior Poet: A Biography of Audre Lorde. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Doury, Marianne, and Assimakis Tseronis
Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela
2016 “Evaluating Policy as Argument: The Public Debate over the First UK Austerity Budget.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1):57–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Deliberative Discourse.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 242–56. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John
2008Political Communication and Deliberation. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gittleson, Ben
2020 “Trump says ‘I don’t kid’ after aids argue he was joking about slowing coronavirus testing.” ABC News, June 23. [URL]. Accessed 18 March 2022.
Goodwin, Jean
2000 “Comments on ‘Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics’.” Argumentation 14 (3):287–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Cicero’s Authority.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (1):38–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Designing Premises.” In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 99–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Argument Has No Function.” Informal Logic 27 (1):69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts.” Argumentation 25 (3):285–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Effective Because Ethical: Speech Act Theory as a Framework for Scientists’ Communication.” In Ethics and Practice in Science Communication, ed. Susanna Priest, Jean Goodwin, and Michael F. Dahlstrom, 13–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grella, Christine
1979 “Reflections on the Convention.” Women’s Studies Newsletter 7 (3):7.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson
1996Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, Elaine, and Dorothy O. Helly
1997 “Looking Back, Moving Forward.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 25 (1/2):6–22.Google Scholar
Henry, Alice, and Toni White
1981 “Women Respond to Racism.” Off Our Backs 11 (7):2–6, 20–21.Google Scholar
Holladay, Hilary
2020The Power of Adrienne Rich: A Biography. New York: Nan A. Talese.Google Scholar
hooks, bell
2000Feminism is for Everybody. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Florence
1981 “Controversy, Crisis, and Commitment within NWSA.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):2.Google Scholar
Howes, Moira, and Catherine Hundleby
2018 “The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation.” Symposion 5(2):229–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Innocenti, Beth
2011 “Countering Questionable Tactics by Crying Foul.” Argumentation and Advocacy 47(3):178–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Innocenti, Beth, and Elizabeth Miller
2016 “The Persuasive Force of Political Humor.” Journal of Communication 66(3):366–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally
2019 “Reason-Giving and the Natural Normativity of Argumentation.” Topoi 38 (4):631–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs
1980 “Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (3):251–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
2000 “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 14(3):261–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad.” Argumentation 20 (4):421–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus
2002 “What Mediators do with Words: Implementing Three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20 (2):177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson
1992 “Relevance and Digressions in Argumentative Discussion: A Pragmatic Approach.” Argumentation 6 (2):161–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jory, Constanza Ihnen
2016 “Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.” Argumentation 30 (2):145–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Deliberating Over Legislative Ends: An Inventory of Goal-(De)legitimizing Argument Schemes.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (3):399–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, Fred J.
1998 “Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.” Argumentation 12 (2):245–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe.” Argumentation 23 (2):239–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, Fred J., and Beth Innocenti
2018 “A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting.” Argumentation 32 (4):463–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kock, Christian
2017Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing About Doing. Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krabbe, Erik C. W.
2007 “On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage.” Argumentation 21 (3):233–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin
2013 “Debating Multiple Positions in Multi-Party Online Deliberation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):151–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy.” Informal Logic 37 (2):85–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What?Topoi 38 (4): 645–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre
1981 “The Uses of Anger.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):7–10.Google Scholar
2007Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde. Berkeley: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, David Estlund, Andreas Føllesdal, Archon Fung, Cristina Lafont, Bernard Manin, and José Luis Martí
2010 “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):64–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Min, Seong Jae
2014 “On the Westerness of Deliberation Research.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2):5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moses, Yolanda T., and Peg Strobel
1981 “Consciousness-Raising at the NWSA Convention: An Overview.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):13.Google Scholar
National Women’s Studies Association
1981Women Respond to Racism: National Women’s Studies Association Third National Conference. Storrs, CT: National Women’s Studies Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rich, Adrienne
1981 “Disobedience is What NWSA is Potentially About.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 4–6.Google Scholar
Rosenfelt, Deborah S.
1981 “A Time for Consideration.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):10–12.Google Scholar
Ryfe, David M.
2005 “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?Annual Review of Political Science 81:49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, Chela
1990 “Feminism and Racism: A Report on the 1981 National Women’s Studies Association Conference.” In Making Face, Making Soul: Haciendo Caras, ed. by Gloria Anzaldúa, 55–71. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books.Google Scholar
Sass, Jensen
2018 “Deliberative Ideals Across Diverse Cultures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren, 86–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sass, Jensen, and John S. Dryzek
2014 “Deliberative Cultures.” Political Theory 42 (1):3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara
1980 “Racism and Women’s Studies.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies 5(1): 48–9. Also published as: Reuben, Elaine, Florence Howe, Barbara Smith, Charlotte Bunch, Arlie Hochschild, and Amy Swerdlow 1979 “Visions and Revisions: Women and the Power to Change.” Women’s Studies Newsletter 7 (3): 18–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sowards, Stacey K., and Valerie R. Renegar
2004 “The Rhetorical Functions of Consciousness-Raising in Third Wave Feminism.” Communication Studies 55 (4):535–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strongman, SaraEllen
2018The Sisterhood: Black Women, Black Feminism, and the Women’s Liberation Movement. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 30611. [URL]
Tanacosa, Ana, and Jensen Sass
2019 “Ritual deliberation.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (2):139–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Townsend, Rebecca M.
2009 “Town Meeting as a Communication Event: Democracy’s Act Sequence.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (1):68–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traister, Rebecca
2018Good and Mad: The Revolutionary Power of Women’s Anger. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-Appropriate Face-Attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2):169–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2015 “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 5 (3):355–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, Ryan
2017 “Rhetoric or Deliberation? The Case for Rhetorical Political Analysis.” Political Studies 65 (2):300–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weger, Jr., Harry, and Mark Aakhus
2003 “Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms: Argumentative Adaptations to Chat Room Design and Some Consequences for Public Deliberation at a Distance.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40 (1):23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar