Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 11:3 (2022) ► pp.394–416

Cultivating contexts for deliberative argumentation

| University of Kansas
What strategies do social actors use to cultivate contexts for deliberative argumentation, and why do they expect them to work? Addressing this question advances understanding of actual deliberative argumentation and methods of analyzing and evaluating it. I analyze two keynote addresses designed to regulate discussions in conference panels that followed, and specifically discussions of how women ought to respond to racism. I find that the keynote speakers use strategies that bring to bear responsibilities inherent to the discussion form of consciousness-raising, including facing facts; listening, talking, and self-scrutinizing even when doing so is difficult or uncomfortable; and acting for change. The strategies make discussion responsibilities determinate, display the badness of moves that damage discussion, and show the speakers are exercising forbearance rather than withdrawing from discussion. These findings illustrate the need to consider how social actors communicatively cultivate local contexts for deliberative argumentation.
Keywords: deliberation, normative pragmatics, feminism, Adrienne Rich, Audre Lorde
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Normative pragmatic accounts of deliberative argumentation
  • 3.Cultivating a context for deliberative argumentation at the 1981 NWSA convention
  • 4.Cultivating a local context for deliberative argumentation
    • 4.1Adrienne Rich’s “Disobedience is what NWSA is potentially about”
    • 4.2Audre Lorde’s “The uses of anger”
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 23 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21018.inn
References (71)
References
Aakhus, Mark. 2007. “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 74 (1):112–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Deliberation Digitized: Designing Disagreement Space Through Communication-Information Services.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):101–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aakhus, Mark, and Marcin Lewiński. 2011. “Argument Analysis in Large-Scale Deliberation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 165–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy.” Argumentation 31 (1):179–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asen, Robert. 2005. “Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere.” Informal Logic 25 (2):117–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Brittney. 2018. Eloquent Rage: A Black Feminist Discovers Her Superpower. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Corredor, Cristina. 2018. “Norms in Deliberation: The Role of the Principles of Justice and Universalization in Practical Discourses on the Justice of Norms.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (68):11–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Deliberative Speech Acts: An Interactional Approach.” Language and Communication 711:136–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cross, Tia, Freada Klein, Barbara Smith, and Beverly Smith. 1982. “Face-to-Face, Day-to-Day – Racism CR.” In All the Women are White, all the Blacks are Men, but Some of Us are Brave, 2nd ed., ed. by Akasha (Gloria T.) Hull, Patricia Bell-Scott, and Barbara Smith, 52–6. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
de Veaux, Alexis. 2004. Warrior Poet: A Biography of Audre Lorde. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Doury, Marianne, and Assimakis Tseronis. 2013. “The Place of Counter Discourse in Two Methods of Public Deliberation: The Conférence de Citoyens and the Débat Public on Nanotechnologies in France.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):75–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela. 2016. “Evaluating Policy as Argument: The Public Debate over the First UK Austerity Budget.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1):57–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Deliberative Discourse.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 242–56. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John. 2008. Political Communication and Deliberation. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gittleson, Ben. 2020. “Trump says ‘I don’t kid’ after aids argue he was joking about slowing coronavirus testing.” ABC News, June 23. [URL]. Accessed 18 March 2022.
Goodwin, Jean. 2000. “Comments on ‘Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics’.” Argumentation 14 (3):287–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Cicero’s Authority.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (1):38–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Designing Premises.” In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 99–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Argument Has No Function.” Informal Logic 27 (1):69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts.” Argumentation 25 (3):285–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Effective Because Ethical: Speech Act Theory as a Framework for Scientists’ Communication.” In Ethics and Practice in Science Communication, ed. Susanna Priest, Jean Goodwin, and Michael F. Dahlstrom, 13–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grella, Christine. 1979. “Reflections on the Convention.” Women’s Studies Newsletter 7 (3):7.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, Elaine, and Dorothy O. Helly. 1997. “Looking Back, Moving Forward.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 25 (1/2):6–22.Google Scholar
Henry, Alice, and Toni White. 1981. “Women Respond to Racism.” Off Our Backs 11 (7):2–6, 20–21.Google Scholar
Holladay, Hilary. 2020. The Power of Adrienne Rich: A Biography. New York: Nan A. Talese.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 2000. Feminism is for Everybody. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Florence. 1981. “Controversy, Crisis, and Commitment within NWSA.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):2.Google Scholar
Howes, Moira, and Catherine Hundleby. 2018. “The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation.” Symposion 5(2):229–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Innocenti, Beth. 2011. “Countering Questionable Tactics by Crying Foul.” Argumentation and Advocacy 47(3):178–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Innocenti, Beth, and Elizabeth Miller. 2016. “The Persuasive Force of Political Humor.” Journal of Communication 66(3):366–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally. 2019. “Reason-Giving and the Natural Normativity of Argumentation.” Topoi 38 (4):631–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs. 1980. “Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (3):251–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 2000. “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 14(3):261–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad.” Argumentation 20 (4):421–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus. 2002. “What Mediators do with Words: Implementing Three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20 (2):177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 1992. “Relevance and Digressions in Argumentative Discussion: A Pragmatic Approach.” Argumentation 6 (2):161–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jory, Constanza Ihnen. 2016. “Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.” Argumentation 30 (2):145–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Deliberating Over Legislative Ends: An Inventory of Goal-(De)legitimizing Argument Schemes.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (3):399–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, Fred J. 1998. “Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.” Argumentation 12 (2):245–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. “Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe.” Argumentation 23 (2):239–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, Fred J., and Beth Innocenti. 2018. “A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting.” Argumentation 32 (4):463–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kock, Christian. 2017. Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing About Doing. Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krabbe, Erik C. W. 2007. “On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage.” Argumentation 21 (3):233–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin. 2013. “Debating Multiple Positions in Multi-Party Online Deliberation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):151–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy.” Informal Logic 37 (2):85–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What?” Topoi 38 (4): 645–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1981. “The Uses of Anger.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):7–10.Google Scholar
. 2007. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde. Berkeley: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, David Estlund, Andreas Føllesdal, Archon Fung, Cristina Lafont, Bernard Manin, and José Luis Martí 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):64–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Min, Seong Jae. 2014. “On the Westerness of Deliberation Research.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2):5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moses, Yolanda T., and Peg Strobel. 1981. “Consciousness-Raising at the NWSA Convention: An Overview.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):13.Google Scholar
National Women’s Studies Association. 1981. Women Respond to Racism: National Women’s Studies Association Third National Conference. Storrs, CT: National Women’s Studies Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1981. “Disobedience is What NWSA is Potentially About.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 4–6.Google Scholar
Rosenfelt, Deborah S. 1981. “A Time for Consideration.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):10–12.Google Scholar
Ryfe, David M. 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 81:49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1990. “Feminism and Racism: A Report on the 1981 National Women’s Studies Association Conference.” In Making Face, Making Soul: Haciendo Caras, ed. by Gloria Anzaldúa, 55–71. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books.Google Scholar
Sass, Jensen. 2018. “Deliberative Ideals Across Diverse Cultures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren, 86–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sass, Jensen, and John S. Dryzek. 2014. “Deliberative Cultures.” Political Theory 42 (1):3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara. 1980. “Racism and Women’s Studies.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies 5(1): 48–9. Also published as: Reuben, Elaine, Florence Howe, Barbara Smith, Charlotte Bunch, Arlie Hochschild, and Amy Swerdlow. 1979. “Visions and Revisions: Women and the Power to Change.” Women’s Studies Newsletter 7 (3): 18–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sowards, Stacey K., and Valerie R. Renegar. 2004. “The Rhetorical Functions of Consciousness-Raising in Third Wave Feminism.” Communication Studies 55 (4):535–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strongman, SaraEllen. 2018. The Sisterhood: Black Women, Black Feminism, and the Women’s Liberation Movement. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 30611. [URL]
Tanacosa, Ana, and Jensen Sass. 2019. “Ritual deliberation.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (2):139–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Townsend, Rebecca M. 2009. “Town Meeting as a Communication Event: Democracy’s Act Sequence.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (1):68–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traister, Rebecca. 2018. Good and Mad: The Revolutionary Power of Women’s Anger. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2008. “‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-Appropriate Face-Attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2):169–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2015. “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 5 (3):355–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, Ryan. 2017. “Rhetoric or Deliberation? The Case for Rhetorical Political Analysis.” Political Studies 65 (2):300–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weger, Jr., Harry, and Mark Aakhus. 2003. “Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms: Argumentative Adaptations to Chat Room Design and Some Consequences for Public Deliberation at a Distance.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40 (1):23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar