Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in ContextVol. 11:3 (2022) ► pp.394–416
Cultivating contexts for deliberative argumentation
What strategies do social actors use to cultivate contexts for deliberative argumentation, and why do they expect them to work? Addressing this question advances understanding of actual deliberative argumentation and methods of analyzing and evaluating it. I analyze two keynote addresses designed to regulate discussions in conference panels that followed, and specifically discussions of how women ought to respond to racism. I find that the keynote speakers use strategies that bring to bear responsibilities inherent to the discussion form of consciousness-raising, including facing facts; listening, talking, and self-scrutinizing even when doing so is difficult or uncomfortable; and acting for change. The strategies make discussion responsibilities determinate, display the badness of moves that damage discussion, and show the speakers are exercising forbearance rather than withdrawing from discussion. These findings illustrate the need to consider how social actors communicatively cultivate local contexts for deliberative argumentation.
Keywords: deliberation, normative pragmatics, feminism, Adrienne Rich, Audre Lorde
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Normative pragmatic accounts of deliberative argumentation
- 3.Cultivating a context for deliberative argumentation at the 1981 NWSA convention
- 4.Cultivating a local context for deliberative argumentation
- 4.1Adrienne Rich’s “Disobedience is what NWSA is potentially about”
- 4.2Audre Lorde’s “The uses of anger”
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Note
-
References
References
Aakhus, Mark
2007 “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 74 (1):112–17. 
2013 “Deliberation Digitized: Designing Disagreement Space Through Communication-Information Services.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):101–26.
Aakhus, Mark, and Marcin Lewiński
2011 “Argument Analysis in Large-Scale Deliberation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 165–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2017 “Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy.” Argumentation 31 (1):179–207.
Asen, Robert
2005 “Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere.” Informal Logic 25 (2):117–37.
Cooper, Brittney
2018 Eloquent Rage: A Black Feminist Discovers Her Superpower. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Corredor, Cristina
2018 “Norms in Deliberation: The Role of the Principles of Justice and Universalization in Practical Discourses on the Justice of Norms.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (68):11–29.
2020 “Deliberative Speech Acts: An Interactional Approach.” Language and Communication 711:136–48.
Cross, Tia, Freada Klein, Barbara Smith, and Beverly Smith
1982 “Face-to-Face, Day-to-Day – Racism CR.” In All the Women are White, all the Blacks are Men, but Some of Us are Brave, 2nd ed., ed. by Akasha (Gloria T.) Hull, Patricia Bell-Scott, and Barbara Smith, 52–6. New York: Feminist Press.
de Veaux, Alexis
2004 Warrior Poet: A Biography of Audre Lorde. New York: Norton.
Doury, Marianne, and Assimakis Tseronis
2013 “The Place of Counter Discourse in Two Methods of Public Deliberation: The Conférence de Citoyens and the Débat Public on Nanotechnologies in France.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):75–100.
Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, Isabela
2016 “Evaluating Policy as Argument: The Public Debate over the First UK Austerity Budget.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1):57–77.
2017 “Deliberative Discourse.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 242–56. London: Routledge.
Gastil, John
2008 Political Communication and Deliberation. Los Angeles: Sage.
Gittleson, Ben
2020 “Trump says ‘I don’t kid’ after aids argue he was joking about slowing coronavirus testing.” ABC News, June 23. [URL]. Accessed 18 March 2022.
Goodwin, Jean
2000 “Comments on ‘Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics’.” Argumentation 14 (3):287–292.
2001 “Cicero’s Authority.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (1):38–60.
2005 “Designing Premises.” In Argumentation in Practice, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 99–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2007 “Argument Has No Function.” Informal Logic 27 (1):69–90.
2011 “Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts.” Argumentation 25 (3):285–96.
2018 “Effective Because Ethical: Speech Act Theory as a Framework for Scientists’ Communication.” In Ethics and Practice in Science Communication, ed. Susanna Priest, Jean Goodwin, and Michael F. Dahlstrom, 13–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grella, Christine
1979 “Reflections on the Convention.” Women’s Studies Newsletter 7 (3):7.
Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson
1996 Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Hedges, Elaine, and Dorothy O. Helly
1997 “Looking Back, Moving Forward.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 25 (1/2):6–22.
Henry, Alice, and Toni White
1981 “Women Respond to Racism.” Off Our Backs 11 (7):2–6, 20–21.
Holladay, Hilary
2020 The Power of Adrienne Rich: A Biography. New York: Nan A. Talese.
hooks, bell
2000 Feminism is for Everybody. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Howe, Florence
1981 “Controversy, Crisis, and Commitment within NWSA.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):2.
Howes, Moira, and Catherine Hundleby
2018 “The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation.” Symposion 5(2):229–54.
Innocenti, Beth
2011 “Countering Questionable Tactics by Crying Foul.” Argumentation and Advocacy 47(3):178–88.
Innocenti, Beth, and Elizabeth Miller
2016 “The Persuasive Force of Political Humor.” Journal of Communication 66(3):366–85.
Jackson, Sally
2019 “Reason-Giving and the Natural Normativity of Argumentation.” Topoi 38 (4):631–43.
Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs
1980 “Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (3):251–65.
Jacobs, Scott
2000 “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 14(3):261–86.
2006 “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad.” Argumentation 20 (4):421–42.
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus
2002 “What Mediators do with Words: Implementing Three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20 (2):177–203.
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson
1992 “Relevance and Digressions in Argumentative Discussion: A Pragmatic Approach.” Argumentation 6 (2):161–76.
Jory, Constanza Ihnen
2016 “Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.” Argumentation 30 (2):145–65.
2020 “Deliberating Over Legislative Ends: An Inventory of Goal-(De)legitimizing Argument Schemes.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (3):399–427.
Kauffeld, Fred J.
1998 “Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.” Argumentation 12 (2):245–66.
2009 “Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe.” Argumentation 23 (2):239–57.
Kauffeld, Fred J., and Beth Innocenti
2018 “A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting.” Argumentation 32 (4):463–83.
Kock, Christian
2017 Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing About Doing. Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
Krabbe, Erik C. W.
2007 “On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage.” Argumentation 21 (3):233–42.
Lewiński, Marcin
2013 “Debating Multiple Positions in Multi-Party Online Deliberation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):151–77.
2017 “Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy.” Informal Logic 37 (2):85–113.
2019 “Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What?” Topoi 38 (4): 645–58.
Lorde, Audre
1981 “The Uses of Anger.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):7–10.
2007 Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde. Berkeley: Crossing Press.
Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, David Estlund, Andreas Føllesdal, Archon Fung, Cristina Lafont, Bernard Manin, and José Luis Martí
2010 “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):64–100.
Min, Seong Jae
2014 “On the Westerness of Deliberation Research.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2):5.
Moses, Yolanda T., and Peg Strobel
1981 “Consciousness-Raising at the NWSA Convention: An Overview.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):13.
National Women’s Studies Association
1981 Women Respond to Racism: National Women’s Studies Association Third National Conference. Storrs, CT: National Women’s Studies Association.
Rich, Adrienne
1981 “Disobedience is What NWSA is Potentially About.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 4–6.
Rosenfelt, Deborah S.
1981 “A Time for Consideration.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (3):10–12.
Ryfe, David M.
2005 “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 81:49–71.
Sandoval, Chela
1990 “Feminism and Racism: A Report on the 1981 National Women’s Studies Association Conference.” In Making Face, Making Soul: Haciendo Caras, ed. by Gloria Anzaldúa, 55–71. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books.
Sass, Jensen
2018 “Deliberative Ideals Across Diverse Cultures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren, 86–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sass, Jensen, and John S. Dryzek
2014 “Deliberative Cultures.” Political Theory 42 (1):3–25.
Smith, Barbara
1980 “Racism and Women’s Studies.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies 5(1): 48–9. Also published as: Reuben, Elaine, Florence Howe, Barbara Smith, Charlotte Bunch, Arlie Hochschild, and Amy Swerdlow 1979 “Visions and Revisions: Women and the Power to Change.” Women’s Studies Newsletter 7 (3): 18–22.
Sowards, Stacey K., and Valerie R. Renegar
2004 “The Rhetorical Functions of Consciousness-Raising in Third Wave Feminism.” Communication Studies 55 (4):535–52.
Strongman, SaraEllen
2018 The Sisterhood: Black Women, Black Feminism, and the Women’s Liberation Movement. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 30611. [URL]
Tanacosa, Ana, and Jensen Sass
2019 “Ritual deliberation.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (2):139–65.
Townsend, Rebecca M.
2009 “Town Meeting as a Communication Event: Democracy’s Act Sequence.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (1):68–89.
Traister, Rebecca
2018 Good and Mad: The Revolutionary Power of Women’s Anger. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Tracy, Karen
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-Appropriate Face-Attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2):169–91.
2010 Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2015 “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 5 (3):355–80.
Walter, Ryan
2017 “Rhetoric or Deliberation? The Case for Rhetorical Political Analysis.” Political Studies 65 (2):300–15.
Weger, Jr., Harry, and Mark Aakhus
2003 “Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms: Argumentative Adaptations to Chat Room Design and Some Consequences for Public Deliberation at a Distance.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40 (1):23–38.