Article published In:
Argumentation and the interpretation of religious texts
Edited by Fabrizio Macagno and Lucia Salvato
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:1] 2023
► pp. 5976
Hietanen, Mika
2005Paul’s Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. LNTS 344. London/New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, David, and Bart Verheij
eds Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument, Analysis and Evaluation Dordrecht Springer
Lahti, Niilo
2017The Maneuvering Paul: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Paul’s Argumentation in First Corinthians 4:18–7:40 . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Eastern Finland.
Luz, Ulrich
1989Matthew 1–7. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
2005Matthew 21–28. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
O’Banion, John D.
1987 “Narration and Argumentation: Quintilian on Narratio as the Heart of Rhetorical Thinking.” Rhetorica 5 (4):325–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbricht, Thomas H.
2008 “Rhetorical Criticism in Biblical Commentaries.” Currents in Biblical Research 7 (1):11–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
1958Traité de l’argumentation:la nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Translated: Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pluijm, Lester C., and Jacky Visser
2011 “David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument, Analysis and Evaluation.” Argumentation 251:527–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegert, Folker
1984Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Röm 9–11. WUNT I/34. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Klyne R.
2008Stories with Intent – A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri
1995Argument and Theology in 1 Peter: The Origins of Christian Paraenesis. JSNTSup 114. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001 “John Chrysostom as a Rhetorical Critic: The Hermeneutics of an Early Father.” Biblical Interpretation 91:180–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Is There Biblical Argumentation?” In Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts, ed. by Anders Eriksson, Thomas H. Olbricht, and Walter Übelacker, 77–92. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
2014Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in Their Rhetorical Context, Minneapolis: Fortress. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Multiple Communication Layers and the Enigma of the Last Judgment (Matt 25,31–46).” In Multiple Teachers in Biblical Texts, ed. by A. L. H. M. van Wieringen and B. J. Koet, 125–146. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 88. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2020 ”The Final Countdown: The Last Judgment in the Light of Narratology and Argumentation Analysis.” In History and Theology in the Gospels: Moscow Conference, ed. by Tobias Nicklas, Karl-Wilhelm Niebuhr, and Mikhail Seleznev. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 289–302.Google Scholar
2021 ”Parables in the Sermon on the Mount: a Cognitive and Rhetorical Perspective.” In Social and Cognitive Perspectives on the Sermon on the Mount, ed. by Rikard Roitto, Colleen Shantz, Petri Luomanen. Studies in Ancient Religion and Culture. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing, 174–204.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen Edelston
1958The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen Edelston, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik
1984An Introduction to Reasoning. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H. et al.
2014Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verheij, Bart
2005 ‘‘Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.” Argumentation 19 (3): 347–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolter, Michael
2002 “Lk 15 als Streitgespräch.” ETL 781:25–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Ruben
2015Puzzling the Parables of Jesus: Methods and Interpretation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar