This article argues that argumentation studies need to engage contemporary theories of new media technologies and culture in order to understand how public argument is empirically embedded. The article discusses the new media ecology with regard to contemporary scholarship and theory around digital cultural subjectivity and cognition, affect, professional political communication, information overload, diffusion, cybernetics and biopower — all arguably essential to understanding public argument today. It then demonstrates one way of studying popular forms of public argument by analyzing rumor bombs. Finally, it proposes that contemporary public argument has a new spatiality and temporality and is thus fundamentally different that what was considered public argument in pre-Web 2.0 culture.
2008“The State of the Network.” Journal for Cultural Research 12 (2): 181-203.
2012“All the News that Confirms Your Views.” Washington Post January. [URL].
Forgas, Joseph P., Orsoyla Vincze, and János László
, (eds) 2013Social Cognition and Communication. Psychology Press.
Franks, David D.
2010Neurosociology. New York: Springer.
Galloway, Alexander R.
2006“Language Wants To Be Overlooked.”Journal of Visual Culture 5 (3): 315-31.
Galloway, Alexander R., and Eugene Thacker.
2007The Exploit. University Of Minnesota Press.
2012“Rumor, Lies, and Weibo: How Social Media is Changing the Nature of Truth in China.”The Atlantic
. April. [URL].
Gerhards, Jürgen, and Mike S. Schafer.
2010“Is the Internet a Better Public Sphere?” New Media & Society 12 (1): 143-60.
Goodnight, G. Thomas.
1981/2012“The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 48 (4): 198-210 (Reprinted from 1981, The Journal of The American Forensic Association, vol. 18: 214-227).
Goodnight, G. Thomas.
2012“The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres: A Note on 21st Century Critical Communication Inquiry.” Argumentation & Advocacy 48 (4): 258-67.
Green, Melanie C., and John K. Donahue.
2011a“Persistence of Belief Change in the Face of Deception.“Media Psychology 14 (3): 312-31.
Greene, Ronald Walter, and Heather Ashley Hayes.
2012“Rhetorical Materialism: The Cognitive Division of Labor and the Social Dimensions of Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 88 (3): 190-3.
2008Alpha Dogs: The Americans Who Turned Political Spin into a Global Business. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
2006“The Rumour Bomb: Theorising the Convergence of New and Old Trends in Mediated US Politics.” Southern Review: Communication, Politics & Culture 39 (1): 84-110.
2010a“Diffusing the Rumor Bomb: ‘John Kerry Is French’(i.e., Haughty, Foppish, Elitist, Socialist, Cowardly, and Gay).”The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects, 163-183.
2000The Information Bomb. London, New York: Verso.
2007Media Argumentation. London: Cambridge University Press.
Weger, Harry Jr., and Mark Aakhus.
2003“Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40 (1): 23-38.
2007The Political Brain. Washington D.C.: PublicAffairs.
Zajonc, Robert B.
1980“Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences.” American Psychologist 35 (2): 151.
Zajonc, Robert B.
2000“Feeling and Thinking: Closing the Debate over the Independence of Affect.” In Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition, 31-58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by 6 other publications
2015. Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture & Critique 8:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
2017. Trump l’Œil: Is Trump's Post-Truth Communication Translatable?. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 21:5 ► pp. 512 ff.
2018. Tactical Connecting and (Im-)Mobilizing in the French Boycott School Day Campaign and Anti-Gender Theory Movement. In Global Cultures of Contestation, ► pp. 193 ff.
2018. Post-Truth Populism: The French Anti-Gender Theory Movement and Cross-Cultural Similarities. Communication, Culture and Critique 11:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
2019. Political Attention: A Genealogy of Reinscriptions. In Communication in the Era of Attention Scarcity, ► pp. 75 ff.
Jenkins, Eric S. & Monica Huzinec
2021. Memeability in an Attention Economy: On the Form of the Nike Kaepernick Meme. Southern Communication Journal 86:4 ► pp. 402 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.