Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp. 103125
References
Alexy, Robert
1989A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotele
1980The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated with an introduction by David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, John
1989“Policy Arguments in Statutory Interpretation.” In Legal Reasoning and Statutory Interpretation, ed. by Jan van Dunné, 55–79. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
Bustamante, Thomas
2013“On the Argumentum ad Absurdum in Statutory Interpretation: Its Uses and Normative Significance.” In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Christian Dahlman, and Eveline T. Feteris, 21–44. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbonell, Flavia
2013“Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions.” In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Christian Dahlman, and Eveline T. Feteris, 1–20. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and James Druckman
2006“A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 571: 99–118.Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T
2002“A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.” Argumentation 161: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihnen Jory, Constanza
2012Pragmatic Argumentation in Law-Making Debates: Instruments for the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament. Doctoral dissertation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Mazzi, Davide
2012a“Analogy in History: A Corpus-Based Study.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b“‘Such a Reaction Would Spread all over the Cell like a Forest Fire’: A Corpus Study of Argument by Analogy in Scientific Discourse.” In Insights into Academic Genres, ed. by Carol Berkenkotter, Vijay K. Bhatia, and Maurizio Gotti, 89–105. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miglioli, Franco
1995“The United States of America.” In Legal English, ed. by Giuliana Garzone, Franco Miglioli, and Rita Salvi, 193–328. Milan: Egea.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2008WordSmith Tools 5.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1996“The Search for Units of Meaning.” Textus 91: 75–106.Google Scholar
1998“The Lexical Item.” In Contrastive Lexical Semantics, ed. by Edda Weigand, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies in Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Summers, Robert
1991“Statutory Interpretation in the United States.” In Interpreting Statutes, ed. by Neil MacCormick, and Robert Summers, 407–459. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H
2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Poppel, Lotte
2012“The Strategic Function of Variants of Pragmatic Argumentation in Health Brochures.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 11: 97–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

McKeown, Jamie
2021. A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Journal of Pragmatics 186  pp. 224 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.