Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.103125
References (21)
Alexy, Robert. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotele. 1980. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated with an introduction by David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, John. 1989. “Policy Arguments in Statutory Interpretation.” In Legal Reasoning and Statutory Interpretation, ed. by Jan van Dunné, 55–79. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
Bustamante, Thomas. 2013. “On the Argumentum ad Absurdum in Statutory Interpretation: Its Uses and Normative Significance.” In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Christian Dahlman, and Eveline T. Feteris, 21–44. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbonell, Flavia. 2013. “Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions.” In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Christian Dahlman, and Eveline T. Feteris, 1–20. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and James Druckman. 2006. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 571: 99–118.Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T. 2002. “A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.” Argumentation 161: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihnen Jory, Constanza. 2012. Pragmatic Argumentation in Law-Making Debates: Instruments for the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament. Doctoral dissertation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Mazzi, Davide. 2012a. “Analogy in History: A Corpus-Based Study.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “‘Such a Reaction Would Spread all over the Cell like a Forest Fire’: A Corpus Study of Argument by Analogy in Scientific Discourse.” In Insights into Academic Genres, ed. by Carol Berkenkotter, Vijay K. Bhatia, and Maurizio Gotti, 89–105. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miglioli, Franco. 1995. “The United States of America.” In Legal English, ed. by Giuliana Garzone, Franco Miglioli, and Rita Salvi, 193–328. Milan: Egea.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2008. WordSmith Tools 5.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1996. “The Search for Units of Meaning.” Textus 91: 75–106.Google Scholar
. 1998. “The Lexical Item.” In Contrastive Lexical Semantics, ed. by Edda Weigand, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies in Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Summers, Robert. 1991. “Statutory Interpretation in the United States.” In Interpreting Statutes, ed. by Neil MacCormick, and Robert Summers, 407–459. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Poppel, Lotte. 2012. “The Strategic Function of Variants of Pragmatic Argumentation in Health Brochures.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 11: 97–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dundon, John Terry
2024. Language ideologies and speaker categorization: a case study from the U.S. legal system. International Journal of Legal Discourse 9:1  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
McKeown, Jamie
2021. A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Journal of Pragmatics 186  pp. 224 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.