Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp. 153168
References

References

ABC Elections
2010 “Australia Votes 2010.” Accessed 2/14/12: http://​www​.abc​.net​.au​/elections​/federal​/2010/.
Baker, K.L., and H. Norpoth
1981“Candidates on Television: The 1972 Electoral Debates in West Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 329–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W.L.
2006“Retrospective versus Prospective Statements and Outcome of Presidential Elections.” Journal of Communication 56: 331–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014Political election debates: Informing voters about policy and character. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., J.R. Blaney, and P.M. Pier
1998Campaign ‘96: A Functional Analysis of Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., and L.M. Brazeal
2002“A Functional Analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis Presidential Debates.” Argumentation and Advocacy 38: 219–233.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., G.J. Hansen, and R.M. Verser
2003“A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 70: 335–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W.L., and A. Harthcock
1999“Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, Attacks, and Defense in the 1960 Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 66: 341–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W.L., and J.R. Henson
2007“A Functional Analysis of the 2006 Canadian and 2007 Australian Election Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy 44: 36–48.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., and A.A. Klyukovski
2006“A Functional Analysis of the 2004 Ukrainian Debates.” Argumentation 20: 209–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W.L., J.P. McHale, G.J. Hansen, P.M. Pier, and J.P. McGuire
2003Campaign 2000: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Campaign Discourse. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., P.M. Pier, L.M. Brazeal, J.P. McHale, A. Klyukovksi, and D. Airne
2002The Primary Decision: A Functional Analysis of Debates in Presidential Primaries. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., and T. Sheafer
2006“Functional Theory and Televised Discourse: Televised Debates in Israel and the United States.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 83: 281–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W.L., K.A. Stein, J.P. Mchale, S. Chattopadhyay, R. Verser, and S. Price
2007Bush versus Kerry: A Functional Analysis of Campaign 2004. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., and W.T. Wells
1996Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Benoit, W.L., W-C. Wen, and T. Yu
2007“A Functional Analysis of 2004 Taiwanese Political Debates.” Asian Journal of Communication 17: 24–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., and M.M. Boyer
1996 “Assessing the Impact of Televised Debates: The Case of the 1988 Canadian Election.” British Journal of Political Science 26: 143–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., E. Gidengil, R. Nadeau, and N. Nevitte
2003 “Campaign Dynamics in the 2000 Canadian Election: How the Leader Debates Salvaged the Conservative Party.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36: 45–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., and A.M.L. Perrella
2008“Systemic Effects of Televised Candidates’ Debates.” International Journal of Press/Politics 13: 451–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and T. Liebes
2000“Peres versus Netanyahu: Television Wins the Debate, Israel, 1996.” In Televised Election Debates: International Perspectives, ed. by S. Coleman, 66–91. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaffee, S.H.
1978“Presidential Debates: Are they Helpful to Voters?” Communication Monographs 49: 330–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J.
(ed.) 2000Televised Election Debates: International Perspectives. New York: St. Martin’s Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S.
2011Leaders in the Living Room: The Prime Ministerial Debates of 2010: Evidence, Evaluation, and Some Recommendations. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
Elections Canada
2011 General Election. 2012. Accessed 2/22/12: http://​enr​.elections​.ca​/Home1​.aspx
Van Eemeren, F.H.
2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fass, T., and J. Maier
2004“Chancellor-Candidates in the 2002 Televised Debates”. German Politics 13: 300–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galasinski, D.
1998 “Strategies of Talking to Each Other: Rule Breaking in Polish Presidential Debates.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17: 165–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Global News
2011 “Analyzing the leaders’ debate.” Accessed 2/12/12: http://​www​.globalnews​.ca​/decisioncanada​/debate​/index​.html.
Hellweg, S.A., M. Pfau, and S.R. Brydon
1992Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K.H., and D.S. Birdsell
1988Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarman, J.W.
2005“Political Affiliation and Presidential Debates: A Real-Time Analysis of the Effect of Arguments Used in the Presidential Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist 49: 229–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaid, L.L., and A. Johnston
2001Videostyle in Presidential Campaigns Style and Content of Televised Political Advertising. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Khang, H.
2008“A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Videostyles of Presidential Debates in the US and Korea.” Asian Journal of Communication 18: 47–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, S.
(ed.) 1962The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1979The Great Debates: Carter versus Ford 1976. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lanoue, D.J.
1991 “Debates that Mattered: Voters’ Reaction to the 1984 Canadian Leadership Debates.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24: 51–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, L., and R. Price
1985 “Great Debates: The Televised Leadership Debates of 1979.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 18: 135–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louden, A.
2011Presidential Political Debates: Selected Bibliography. Accessed 1/15/11: http://​www​.wfu​.edu​/~louden​/Political%20Communication​/Bibs​/DEBATES​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Maier, J., and T. Faas
2003“The Affected German Voter: Televised Debates, Follow-up Communication, and Candidate Evaluations.” Communications 28: 383–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsaganis, M., and C. Weingarten
2001 “The 2000 U.S. Presidential Debate versus the 2000 Greek Prime Minister Debate.” American Behavioral Scientist 44: 2398–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M.S., and D.B. Carlin
2004“Political Campaign Debates.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. by L.L. Kaid, 203–234. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Merritt, S.
1984“Negative Political Advertising: Some Empirical Findings.” Journal of Advertising 13: 27–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, D.J.
1977“Two Concepts of Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 13: 121–128.Google Scholar
Reinemann, C., and M. Maurer
2005“Unifying or Polarizing Short-Term Effects and Postdebate Consequences of Different Rhetorical Strategies in Televised Debates.” Journal of Communication 55: 775–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rill, L., and W.L. Benoit
2009A Functional Analysis of 2008 General Election Debates. Chicago, IL: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
Schrott, P.R.
1990“Electoral Consequences of “Winning” Televised Campaign Debates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 567–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C.J.
1975“Voter Perception of Mud-Slinging in Political Communication.” Central States Speech Journal 26: 279–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, W.T.
1999An Analysis of Attacking, Acclaiming, and Defending Strategies in the 1976-1984 Presidential Debates. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Maskor, Mazlan, Niklas K. Steffens & S. Alexander Haslam
2021. The Psychology of Leadership Destabilization: An Analysis of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Debates. Political Psychology 42:2  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.