Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.169197
References
Berkley, S
1991“Parenteral Transmission of HIV in Africa.” AIDS 5 (Suppl 1): S87–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, L
2000 “Petitio Principii: The Case for Non-Fallaciousness.” Informal Logic 20 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
2002 “Reasoning under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry.” Informal Logic 22 (2): 113–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Analogical Reasoning as a Tool of Epidemiological Investigation.” Argumentation 18 (4): 427–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Giving Science a Bad Name: Politically and Commercially Motivated Fallacies in BSE Inquiry.” Argumentation 19 (2): 123–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Emerging Infectious Diseases: Coping with Uncertainty.” Argumentation 23 (2): 171–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Rethinking the BSE Crisis: A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Considering Risk Assessment up Close: The Case of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy.” Health, Risk & Society 13 (3): 255–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a“The Public Health Scientist as Informal Logician.” International Journal of Public Health 57 (3): 649–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b“The Contribution of Informal Logic to Public Health.” Perspectives in Public Health 132 (2): 66–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012c“Scaring the Public: Fear Appeal Arguments in Public Health Reasoning.” Informal Logic 32 (1): 25–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Public Health Reasoning: Much More than Deduction.” Archives of Public Health 71 (1): 25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a “Informal Fallacies as Cognitive Heuristics in Public Health Reasoning.” Informal Logic 34 (1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “The ‘Trust’ Heuristic: Arguments from Authority in Public Health.” Health Communication 29 (10): 1043–1056. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2014c “Circles and Analogies in Public Health Reasoning.” Inquiry, to appear.Google Scholar
De Grandis, Giovanni
2011“On the Analogy between Infectious Diseases and War: How to Use It and Not To Use It.” Public Health Ethics 4 (1): 70–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice A
1981“Fallacies and the Evaluation of Reasoning.” American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1): 13–22.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd
2008“Why Heuristics Work.” Perspectives in Psychological Science 3 (1): 20–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Henry Brighton
2009“Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1): 107–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godden, David M., and Douglas Walton
2007“A Theory of Presumption for Everyday Argumentation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 15 (2): 313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guarini, Marcello, Amy Butchart, Paul Simard Smith, and Andrei Moldovan
2009 “Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-Disciplinary Guide.” Informal Logic 29 (2): 84–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L
1970Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Bjørn, Jan Helge Solbakk, and Søren Holm
2006 “Analogical Reasoning in Handling Emerging Technologies: The Case of Umbilical Cord Blood Biobanking.” The American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6): 49–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Stephen, and Lynn J. Frewer
2001“Impact of BSE on Attitudes to GM Food.” Risk , Decision and Policy 6 (2): 91–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klahr, David
2000Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of Discovery Processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Makins, Marian
(ed.) 1991Collins English Dictionary. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart
1974“A System of Logic Raciocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume VIII1, ed. by J.M. Robson. Toronto and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Muraskin, William
1993“Hepatitis B as a Model (and Anti-Model) for AIDS.” In AIDS and Contemporary History, ed. by Virginia Berridge, and Philip Strong, 108–132. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plant, Aileen J
2008“When Action Can’t Wait: Investigating Infectious Disease Outbreaks.” In Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Gabriele Bammer, and Michael Smithson, 45–54. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas
1977Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2006Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todd, Peter M., and Gerd Gigerenzer
2000“Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5): 727–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waller, Bruce N
2001“Classifying and Analysing Analogies.” Informal Logic 21 (3): 199–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N
1985“Are Circular Arguments Necessarily Vicious?” American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4): 263–74.Google Scholar
1992“Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance.” American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (4): 381–87.Google Scholar
1996Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2010“Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are.” Informal Logic 30 (2): 159–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, Sandy
2012“The Emergence of a ‘Dose-Response’ Analogy in the Health Improvement Domain of Public Health: A Critical Review.” Critical Public Health 22 (4): 427–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Andrew W
2006“How Dangerous are Mobile Phones, Transmission Masts, and Electricity Pylons?” Archives of Diseases in Childhood 91 (4): 361–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woods, John
1995“Appeal to Force.” In Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. by Hans V. Hansen, and Robert C. Pinto, 240–250. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
2004The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zylberman, Patrick
2010“Comment: Influenza Epidemics and the Politics of Historical Analogy.” In Influenza and Public Health, ed. by Tamara Giles-Vernick, and Susan Craddock, 84–90. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Cummings, Louise
2015. The Challenge for Public Health. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2015. Circular Argument. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty,  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2015. Philosophy and Public Health. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2015. Argument from Analogy. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty,  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2020. Critical Thinking in Medicine and Health. In Fallacies in Medicine and Health,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2020. Arguments from Analogy. In Fallacies in Medicine and Health,  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.