Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 5:3 (2016) ► pp.315347
References
Amgoud, Leila, and Henri Prade
2006 “Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue.” In Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems: Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 26, 2005: Revised Selected and Invited Papers, ed. by Simon Parsons, Nicolas Maudet, Pavlos Moraitis, and Iyad Rahwan, 88–103. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert
1984The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Blanken, Henk
2013a “Het lot van Loppersum [The fate of Loppersum].” Dagblad van het Noorden (Weekend, p. 6), 18 May 2013.Google Scholar
2013b “We zitten allemaal in een dooie hoek hier [We Are All in a Blind Spot Over Here].” Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 4), 2 November 2013.Google Scholar
2013c “‘Ze zuigen het leeg en doen niets terug’ [‘They’re Sucking it Out and Do Nothing in Return’] Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 6), 9 April 2013.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Morton
2014 “Cooperation, Competition, and Conflict.” In The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. ed. by Peter T. Coleman, Morton Deutsch, and Eric C. Marcus, 3–28. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley. First edition: San Francisco CA: Jossey Bass, 2000.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo
2008 “Dichotomies and Types of Debates.” In Controversy, and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Veer, Johan
2013a “NAM geeft gewoon niet thuis [NAM Simply doesn’t Answer].” Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 22), 12 September 2013.Google Scholar
2013b “Mensen worden ongeduldig en steeds bozer [People are Getting Impatient and More and More Angry].” Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 2), 5 December 2013.Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov M., and Woods, John
2001a “Non-cooperation in Dialogue Logic.” Synthese 127 (1-2): 161–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, Dov M., and John Woods
2001b “More on Non-cooperation in Dialogue Logic.” Logic Journal of the IGPL 9 (2): 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Govier, Trudy
1997Social Trust and Human Communities. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
1999 “Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics.” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, 397–403. Amsterdam: SIC SAT.Google Scholar
2000 “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 14 (3): 261–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Messages, Functional Contexts, and Categories of Fallacy: Some Dialectical and Rhetorical Considerations.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis ( Argumentation library 6), ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 119–130. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Nonfallacious Rhetorical Design in Argumentation. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues ( Argumentation library 14), ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen.), 55–78. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Ralph H
2000Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair
1983Logical Self-defense, 2nd ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. First ed. 1977.Google Scholar
Krabbe, Erik C.W
2003 “Metadialogues.” In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation ( Argumentation library 8), ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 83–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, Marcin, and Mark Aakhus
2014 “Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.” Argumentation 28 (2): 161–185. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Luyendijk, Wubby
2014 “Het beven wordt eerst nog erger [Quaking Getting Worse to Start with].” NRC reader, 1 October 2014. [URL]Google Scholar
2015 “Al een jaar belooft de NAM sommetjes over de risico’s [For a Year now NAM has been Promising to do Sums about the Risks].” NRC-Handelsblad, 27 January 2015.Google Scholar
Meijer Commission
2013Vertrouwen in een duurzame toekomst: Een stevig perspectief voor Noord-Oost Groningen: Eindadvies van de Commissie Duurzame Toekomst Noord-Oost Groningen [Trust in a Sustainable Future: A Solid Perspective for Northeast Groningen: Final Recommendations of the Committee Sustainable Future Northeast Groningen]. [URL]Google Scholar
NAM
2012Lichte aardbeving bij Sappemeer [Light Earthquake Near Sappemeer]. Press release. [URL]Google Scholar
RTV Noord
2015 ‘VVD-kamerlid bespreekt gastactiek telefonisch in de trein.’ [Liberal MP Discusses Gas Tactics on Telephone in Train] RTV Noord (website), 17 January 2015. [URL] Google Scholar
Sevink, Geert Job
2013De NAM bedrijft gewoon koehandel [The NAM is Just Engaged in Horse-trading]. Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 2), 24 September 2013.Google Scholar
van Dalen, Roelof
2013 ”In Westen denken ze dat beving kermisattractie is [In the West they Think a Quake is a Fairground Attraction].” Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 4), 2 November 2013.Google Scholar
2015 “Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 30 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels
2012 ”Effectiveness through Reasonableness: Preliminary Steps to Pragma-dialectical Effectiveness Research.” Argumentation 26 (1): 33–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
2002.” Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse: A Delicate Balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis ( Argumentation library 6), ed by. Frans H. van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 ”Countering Fallacious Moves.” Argumentation 21 (3): 243–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Laar, Jan Albert, and Erik C.W. Krabbe
2016a. “Eerlijke en oneerlijke strategieën in maatschappelijke discussies [Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies].” In De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen [The Power of Language: Research in Speech Communication in The Netherlands and Flanders], ed. by Dorien Van De Mieroop, Lieven Buysse, Roel Coesemans en Paul Gillaerts, 131–143. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
2016b ”Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies: The Case of Induced Earthquakes.” In Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewinski, 343–362. London: College Publications (Studies in Logic and Argumentation 62).Google Scholar
2016c ”Splitting a Difference of Opinion.” In Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) , May 18-21, 2016, ed. by Patrick Bondy and Laura Benacquista. Windsor, ON: OSSA. To be published.
van Sluis, Bas
2012De grond beeft [The Ground Quakes]. Dagblad van het Noorden (p. 10), 1 September 2012.Google Scholar
van Veenen, Jelle, and Henry Prakken
2006 “A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation.” In Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems: Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 26, 2005: Revised Selected and Invited Papers, ed. by Simon Parsons, Nicolas Maudet, Pavlos Moraitis, and Iyad Rahwan (Eds.) 138–153. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N
1995A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
2007Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., and Erik C.W. Krabbe
1995Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wikipedia
2014Aardgaswinning in Nederland [Natural Gas Extraction in the Netherlands]. Accessed 19 November 2014. [URL]Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2011The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. First published in 2009.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Castro, Diego
2022. Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings. Argumentation 36:3  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Innocenti, Beth
2022. Demanding a halt to metadiscussions. Argumentation 36:3  pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Krabbe, Erik C. W. & Jan Albert van Laar
2021. Be reasonable!. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018. Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation. Argumentation 32:3  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.