Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in ContextVol. 5:3 (2016) ► pp.348–352
Book review
. Thought Experiments in Academic Communication. A Pragma-Dialectical Method for Reconstructing the Argumentative Use of Imaginary Scenarios in Academic Disputes. Doctoral Dissertation.University of Amsterdam, 2016.
Reviewed by
References (6)
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Eemeren, F. H. van, and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris.
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. 1977a. A function for thought experiments. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition, 240–265. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1977b). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition, 225–240. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norton, J. D. (1996). Are thought experiments just what you thought? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3): 333–366.